Hopefully you all read my previous blog in which the judge informed us that, after stabbing Novak several times, his Sikh murderer seems to have taken pleasure in filming Novak as he crawled away fatally infjured in an attempt to flee his murderer.
Time to bring back the death penalty?
Makerfield’s men and women
As millions of words from real and self-appointed pundits have pointed out, on Thursday Makerfield’s 76,845 voters are about to decide if Britain gets ruined by our useless, UK-hating, migrant-hugging, worker-loathing, benefits-scroungers-loving, Islamophiliac, rapist-protecting incompetents in the Labour Party which no longer represents workers. Or whether the Manchester Messiah, the over-entitled ‘King of the North – Andrew Burnham – is given a bloody nose and (hopefully) disappears from our lives.
The omens (polls) are not great. It seems like Makerfield’s female voters are likely to carry the (IMHO) repulsive, shape-shifting Burnham back to Westminster and then into 10 Downing Street:
Around 53% of Makerfield’s females seem to prefer Burnham to Reform. But only 43% of Makerfield’s men look to be voting for reform. Oh dear. It seems we may be doomed.
Perhaps, even more horrific than the Manchester Messiah becoming Prime Minister is the likelihood that the (IMHO) deranged, scientifically-challenged, recidivist-lying climate zealot Ed Miliband may become our next Chancellor.
Dear women of Makerfiled, please don’t destroy our once great country. Please come to your senses before it is too late.
I couldn’t write a blog yesterday as the ‘wonderful’ security system protecting my website wouldn’t let me in to my own website.
The true horror of the Sikh slaughter of Henry Novak
We all know many of the details of the murder of white teenager Henry Novak and the way the murderer’s family tried to protect the murderer. But I’m not sure any national newspaper actually revealed in detail the true horror of the murder. For that, we have to go to the judge’s summing up:
Not long after 11pm on 3/12/2025, Henry Nowak was walking back to his university accommodation in Portswood, Southampton after an evening out. His route took him north along Belmont Road and he was approaching a junction with St Denys Road where you lived with your family. Henry was not drunk but may have been affected a little by the small amount of alcohol he had consumed over the previous few hours. He was not a regular drinker and did not generally drink to excess. His blood alcohol level at the time of his death was below the legal limit for driving. He was alone and unarmed. You happened to be walking south along Belmont Road on the same pavement. It was to be a chance meeting.
You were sober but were carrying a large Sikh dagger in a sheath attached to a belt over the outside of your clothing.
You drew the dagger from its sheath and, as the jury was sure, you deliberately stabbed Henry in the chest with it. The knife passed through, several layers of clothing, as demonstrated by the multiple slits in his dark top where the material had been overlaid on itself in the struggle and the single slit in his shirt. It passed upwards through soft tissue, between the two uppermost ribs, catching a lung and cutting an important vein, behind the collar bone. This was to a depth of 8cm from the skin surface. The consequent bleeding flowed into his chest cavity.
The pathologist, Amanda Jeffrey, found 1200 ml, or over 2 pints, of blood there. She said that no emergency medical treatment would have permitted access to the bleeding vein. In simple terms, he would not have survived, however quickly he received first aid, CPR or expert medical treatment.
You also stabbed him twice to the upper leg at some point and once again to the lower abdomen/groin area at the front. The latter only resulted in a knife tip injury; the former were both to a substantial depth although not as deep as the chest wound. Henry’s face was also slashed with the blade of the dagger but I cannot be sure that was aimed or intended. However, one or more of the four stabs must have had an immediate effect as Henry was never able to put up his hands to defend himself from further serious injury. He was defenceless.
Your brother, Gurpreet, arrived on the scene very shortly after your attack had finished. You then filmed Henry desperately trying to get away from you, somehow scaling a fence, onto a communal bin, before landing on a car in front of the property next door. Bloodstains show that he had got one, more or all his injuries before then.
You then showed a callous disregard for his wellbeing, knowing you had stabbed him to the chest. You continued to make films of Henry suffering, ignoring much of his desperation at having been stabbed. You told him that had not happened, no doubt to convince others who were nearby. Your attitude did not change even though Henry was clearly going downhill very fast. Your brother did much the same, although he may just have been accepting that which you had told him, rather than lying himself. You lied to him that you had been attacked, picking up on his question about whether it had been accompanied by racism by falsely claiming that Henry had called you a “Paki.” I am sure that Henry had said nothing racist. You are the only person to make that claim and it is completely at odds with his previous character.
You joined your brother in relating these lies to the police. By then your mother and father were at the scene. Gurpreet explained that no weapons had been involved or were present. In fact, whilst he was talking to the call operator, you told your mother to take the murder weapon, sheath and belt away which she did. You did not tell your father what had really happened. Much of the time you just stood by as he, at least, tried to do something to help Henry.
You carried on telling these wicked lies when police attended on the scene, hampering them in doing their job and, effectively, obstructing the course of justice. You kept Henry’s phone with the incriminating recording of you on it. You had no intention of handing it over. It was found on you after you had been arrested and taken into police custody.
Thereafter, the time came when the police needed permission from a court to extend the time for you to be questioned in custody and arranged for you and Gurpreet to be taken there for that purpose. They took the opportunity to record secretly any conversation between the two of you on the journey. Speaking in Punjabi, you agreed to pretend you had acted in self-defence even though you confessed to stabbing Henry three times, including once to the chest with the dagger. You knew you were guilty, demonstrated by your saying to Gurpreet that if there were any cameras in that part of Belmont Road, you would be unable to put forward self-defence. You decided, much as you had at the scene, to try to cover it up. In all your police interviews, you decided not to answer questions about the incident. Instead, you made a written statement, on 7/12/2025, which told more lies.
I will not comment on the ‘Britishness’ or tribal behaviour of the murderer and his family. I will merely wonder whether their reaction to the murder makes civil war inevitable.
Here’s how the Guardian supposed ‘newspaper’ reported the alleged attempted beheading in Belfast
Headline: How Belfast knife attack became the latest far-right ‘trigger event
Strapline: The rapid spread of footage shows how social media is pivotal in enabling far-right agitators to mobilise internationally
Main text
Filmed at about 10.30pm on Monday night on a Belfast street, bystanders captured the moment when a man, believed to be a Sudanese asylum seeker, wielded a knife over another man he had pinned to the ground.
By Tuesday, the clip had become the latest transnational “trigger event” – in the mould of the Southport killings and the case of the murdered 18-year-old student Henry Nowak – as far-right activists from Britain and beyond seized on it.
Those playing a pivotal role in the spread of the footage on Elon Musk’s X included the far-right activist known as Tommy Robinson, fresh from a meeting this week at a sumptuous Moscow hotel with the billionaire’s father.
X eventually placed age-related restrictions and a warning on the video shared by Robinson, but by Tuesday afternoon it had more than 52,000 views, while full and uncensored versions were still easy to find across the platform.
Hold on a minute There are more than a few problems with this report from the supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian:
The multi-cultural enricher from Sudan didn’t just “wield a knife over another man he had pinned to the ground”. The Sudanese gentleman was actually (from what I understand) trying to cut the Belfast’s man’s head off. That’s not just “wielding a knife“.
There is no investigation in the supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – of how the alleged beheader came to Britain illegally by using the Southern Irish open-border route nor of how many thousands (or tens of thousands?) have illegally invaded Britain by coming via the utterly corrupt mafia state – the Irish Republic
There is no investigation in the supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – of how the alleged beheader was allowed by our worse than useless Home Office to stay in Britain despite being an illegal migrant
The supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – uses the depressingly predictable Starmer and Establishment tactic of trying to ‘shoot the messenger’ – attack anyone reporting on the alleged beheading. It hardly seems to criticise the alleged beheader
The supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – rather unsubtly tries to drag Elon Musk, Elon Musk’s father and Tommy Robinson into the story and tries to throw mud at them, especially when the Guardian writes about “a sumptuous Moscow hotel”
I could go on. But I imagine you get the picture by now. I don’t know who, if anyone, actually reads the Guardian apart from BBC lifers and our useless, ‘progressive’, migrant-hugging, UK-hating, climate catastrophist teachers. But clearly they inhabit a woke world far detached from anything resembling reality.
Ir’s so predictable it’s becoming more than insulting. Every time some multi-cultural enricher commits some awful crime against a White British citizen and people get angry at the collapse of our society due to mass-migration, open-borders, Third-world invasion, Starmer and his UK-hating cronies (enthusiastically supported by the BBC and most of the mainstream media) launch their all-out attacks on anyone daring to discuss how and why the latest atrocity happened. Of course, the UK-loathing, UN-adoring, Davos-loving Starmer and his anti-British apparatchiks desperately avoid discussing the reazson for the actual atrocity. Deflection and evasion are the names of the game they play again and again and again and …….
Here’s the excellent New Culture Forum explaining the Starmer ‘shoot the messenger’ deflection tactic:
Here’s a picture of three very famous Welsh people.
They are all particularly known for their distinctive voices and two have definitely sung in Welsh choirs. But can you spot the one most likely to become an Islam-inspired mass murderer? Our politicians and Home Office bureaucrats and police can’t.
Is “Eurabia” more than a conspiracy theory?
The basis for the push to swamp Europe with our friends from our favourite religion is based on the idea that the French, who have always loathed (envied?) the US, were keen to weaken relations with America and instead build closer relations with the Arab countries. This would, of course, elevate France’s position in the world as one of the leaders of the Europe/Arab power block and ensure reliable supplies of oil and gas to Europe.
Wikipedia tells us that those pushing the Eurabia theory claim that Europe: “has surrendered to Islam and is in a state of submission (described as dhimmitude) in which Europe is forced to deny its own culture, stand silently by in the face of Muslim atrocities, accept Muslim immigration, and pay tribute through various types of economic assistance.”
We’re assured that Eurabia is an Islamophobic conspiracy theory and a doomsday scenario in which Europe will be Islamized in the near future. The doomsday scenario involves Muslims forming the majority of Europe’s population by the end of the 21st century, due to immigration and to higher birth-rates. They will then seize control and Islamize the continent.
Of course, the people espousing the Eurabia theory are obviously demented conspiracy theorists. Apart from the beheading of a French teacher, the attempted beheading of Lee Rigby, the recent attempted beheading of a Belfast man, the Southport dance class massacre, the Manchester Arena massacre, the Paris concert massacre, the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the Theo Van Gogh murder, the Pim Fortuyn murder, the London transport bombings, the mass rape of possibly tens of thousands of often underage White British girls, the frequent sexual assaults on British girls and women by our Religion of Peace friends and the fact that White British are now minorities in several of our towns and cities, there is absolutely no evidence that our rulers are imposing their Eurabia fantasies on us.
Am I a “racist” Mr Starmer?
I haven’t been rioting and attacking our useless anti-British police or whatever. But, from the little I understand, just because I’d rather not be stabbed multiple times or be beheaded by a multi-cultural enricher next time I go shopping, according to people like Starmer and the BBC and the UK mainstream media, I must be a racist.
I believe one has to be careful about what one writes or says about an ongoing legal case, especially one involving a multi-cultural enricher. Otherwise one risks a 4.00 am visit from five or six armed members of the Starmer SS police. However, one cannot avoid wondering about the cultural and societal implications of a current case.
From what little I understand, a lady from a multi-culturally enriching community has been accused of taking the bloodstained knife her son used to murder an innocent White teenager and hiding it, reportedly to try to protect her murdering son. I think this raises two possibly interesting issues about today’s rich and diverse British population.
Is it “what any mother would do”?
Apparently one of the good lady’s explanations for trying to protect a murderer was that she only did “what any mother would do“. But is that true? Or would it be more accurate to say that it was “what any mother from a multi-culturally enriching community would do“? Because it’s not obvious to a useless ignorant fool like myself that this what any mother from a White British family would do. In fact I believe there have been cases where White British mothers have informed police of their criminal sons’ behaviour. If this is true, it might suggest that when push comes to shove, when the rubber hits the road, when it comes to the crunch, when the chips are down, our friends from our wonderful multi-culturally enriching communities have a tendency to revert to tribal behaviour showing that their supposed ‘Britishness’ and acceptance of our values are sometimes less than skin deep.
What punishment (if any) will the good lady receive?
The next issue concerns what happens if the good lady in question is judged to be guilty of all sorts of stuff like trying to pervert the course of justice. Will she be dealt with using Starmer’s beloved ‘full force of the law’? Or will she suddenly discover that she has PTSD and ADHD and all sorts of other supposed ‘mental illnesses’ brought on by witnessing her darling son murdering someone? Then will Britain’s world-respected system of two-tier justice kick in and decide that, as the lady is a multi-cultural enricher (and not some loathsome White British citizen writing rapidly-deleted hurty tweets) then it would be unfair to punish her too harshly and so she’ll receive the usual suspended sentence regularly handed to multi-culturally enriching criminals, thugs, rapists and suchlike?
Anyway, I’ll be waiting with bated breath to see how this case pans out.
I don’t watch much TV nowadays. But I have been watching some PBS America programmes. Some of their historical documentaries are complete rubbish, especially those using seemingly endless and often rather dubious ‘historical re-enactments’. But some are really quite good, especially those using real historical footage. One which has impressed me recently was titled “The Impossible Peace”. It traces the events of the twenty years between the end of the First World War and the start of the Second World War showing the inevitability of the Second World War due to the blundering, incompetence, greed, thirst for power and ambitions of the world’s leading politicians.
Of course, it’s easy to have 20/20 vision in hindsight. So perhaps many of the politicians’ mistakes leading the world from the disaster of World War 1 to the disaster of World War 2 weren’t obvious at the time?
That brings us to today’s Britain. I have two propositions:-
our politicians are making mistakes which will lead our once great country to disaster
those mistakes are already glaringly obvious to anyone with even a smidgen of intelligence
The only thing we don’t know is whether Britain’s coming disaster will end (to borrow from T.S. Elliott) with a bang – societal breakdown and civil war – or a whimper – a gradual decline into bankruptcy and irrelevance. But what are already clear are the errors our leaders are currently making which will lead us to the bang or whimper.
The main ones seem to be:
Population replacement: Our rulers seem to believe that anyone in the world has the right to come and live in Britain. On the Left this seems to be linked to an obsession that everything the British Empire did was evil and therefore we should hand over our country to the people we supposedly oppressed. Some estimated suggest that White British will be in a minority within 20 to 30 years. White British are already a minority in several cities and towns. In London just 36.8% are White British. In Birmingham only 42.9%. In Leicester 40.9%. In Slough 34.5%. In Luton 44.6%.
Two-tier government: The White British population can clearly see that they are being discriminated against while supposed minorities seem to get prioritised. For example, an estimated 382,000 British are homeless while illegal Third-world migrants get free 4-star hotels, free clothes, free meals, free money, free new phones. And while many White British struggle to see a doctor or get a dental appointment, illegal migrants get immediate medical and dental care plus a free taxi to take them to their medical or dental appointment. And, of course, we all know about two-tier policing and our two-tier ‘justice’ system which leads to long prison sentences for any White British using hurty words on social media while pro-Palestinian and BLM thugs can scream hatred and riot without any fear of any consequences.
Decriminalisation of crimes committed by minorities: Crimes like shoplifting and gang rape seem to have been decriminalised, especially if committed by people from ethnic minorities. For example, tens of thousands of often underage White girls seem to have been gang-raped by members of a certain community and only about 70 men have ever been prosecuted. Either those 70 or so men must have been very busy raping every hour of every day or else our police, politicians and prosecutors have been desperately trying to look the other way as they didn’t want to ‘create division’ between communities. Perhaps the mass rape of White girls ‘didn’t cross Mr Starmer’s desk’ when he was Director of Public Prosecutions? And, of course, we’re seen Labour fighting tooth and nail to prevent any national inquiry into the mainly Religion of Peace rape gangs.
Politicisation and militarisation of the police: Our police no longer seem interested in fighting crime. They now see their role as focused mainly on oppressing and subjugating an increasingly angry White British population which sees its country being taken away from them and feels they are becoming second- or third-class citizens in their own country.
Crushing free speech: There are far too many examples of this to list here. Father Ted co-creator Graham Linehan was been arrested by armed police at Heathrow Airport on suspicion of inciting violence in relation to his posts on X about men pretending to be women. A three-year prison sentence given to a woman for a rapidly deleted hurty tweet after the Southport slaughter by the ‘Welsh choirboy’. Ordinary people being dragged out of bed in the early morning by 5 or 6 police for something they have written on social media.
Economically-suicidal Net Zero: It seems that almost everyone in the country, except for our politicians, can see that Britain’s ‘legally-binding’ Net Zero policies are giving us the highest energy prices in the developed world, bankrupting our businesses and throwing hundreds of thousands out of work. Everybody, except our politicians, can see that no business can survive and compete when crippled by energy prices which are 3 to 4 times those in the US and at least 5 to 6 times higher than those in other countries which are taking our jobs.
A benefits system with a country attached: About 1,000 people a day are registering as being supposedly long-term sick and unable to work. approximately 300,000 working-age adults fall out of work due to long-term sickness each year. About 2,500,000 people are registered as being too ill to even look for work. You’ve all seen the Pat McFadden quote that every meeting he had with members of the Parliamentary Labour Party concerned the question: “Who can we tax in order to pay benefits to others?” To anyone outside the Labour, LibDems and Greens, it’s clear this situation cannot continue. Bankruptcy is the only possible conclusion.
Of course, there are many more issues than these leading us to our own destruction. But just these glaringly obvious mistakes our politicians are making will clearly lead to disaster. Our country is no longer a country. It’s just a geographical location where many different people live uneasily beside each other with tension very close to the surface. As we get poorer and the government needs to oppress us ever more to keep public fury under control, disaster becomes ever more inevitable. But what we can’t know is whether this disaster will be a bang – societal collapse and civil war – or a whimper – gradual decline into bankruptcy and irrelevance.
It will be interesting to see how it all pans out. And one day maybe PBS America will do a documentary on how Britain’s politicians destroyed their country?
Britain’s greatest and most patriotic prime minister, Mr Starmer, has spoken about the Henry Nowak murder. “Nigel Farage is completely wrong to use this to try and create division,” thundered our great Prime Minister on Tuesday. On Wednesday, in the Commons, MPs shouted and yelled to drown Nigel Farage out as he tried to ask the (IMHO) worthless empty suit Starmer a question about the murder. And all over the media plenty of Labour and Tory and LibDem MPs all piled in with similar ad hominem attacks on Farage. Watching the tsunami of bile aimed at Farage by every grifting, hypocritical establishment crony, you could almost have thought that Farage was the murderer.
I am appalled, upset and angry at the murder of Henry Nowak by a Sikh and his family ably assisted by the useless, UK-hating Hampshire police. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am appalled, upset and angry that the police who hastened Nowak’s death aren’t being prosercuted for manslaughter. Instead one has resigned and the others are still working. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am appalled, upset and angry that the murderer’s family, who seem to have assisted in the murder by lying to the police haven’t been arrested and charged, especially the mother who, it is reported, tried to hide the murder weapon. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am enraged at Starmer’s two-tier policing which tries to protect any criminal who is not British while using the ‘full force of the law’ to crush any White British who criticise the government. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am furious that three multi-cultural-enriching rapists weren’t even given prison sentences when any White British would have ended up spending years behind bars. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am incandescent that Labour councils and Labour-adoring police and a certain well-known Director of Public Prosecutions allowed thousands of White British, often underage girls to be gang raped again and again and again and again by mainly Pakistani Religion of Peace rape gangs. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am fuming that three innocent young girls were slaughtered at a Taylor Swift themed dance class in Southport by a multi-cultural enricher and that the politicians, police and mainstream media tried to cover up the murderer’s identity by claiming he was just a “Welsh choirboy”. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am furious that Labour is destroying the British economy by deliberately taxing companies so they go bankrupt in order to have more money for Labour to spaff on skivers and shirkers and parasites and illegal Third-world migrants and other (IMHO) scum. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
I am beyond incandescent that our UK-loathing, EU- and UN-adoring excuse for a government is trying to make White British a minority in their own country within the next 20-30 years. So, am I guilty of “creating division”, Mr Starmer?
Hopefully many of you saw the interview with the fragrant Nicola Sturgeon on ‘Red’ Laura Kuenssberg’s Sunday political Labour-loving show. I, of course, believe eveverything the Wee Jimmy Krankie said:
Obviously she wouldn’t have been surprised at the:
Jaguar car which appeared on her driveway
The massive mobile home parked at the side of her 80-year-old parents-in-law’s house
The pens and pepper pots and suchlike costing thousands of pounds
And all the other goodies bought by her husband with embezzled money
After all, she was just a working-class girl from the North of Scotland. So such items would be quite normal in a modest home like hers.
But, just like our world-respected BBC, I have to be impartial and thus must give both sides of every story just like the BBC does on subjects like ‘Global Boiling’ and ‘Safe end Effective Vaccines’ and how wonderful the EU is and what a disaster Brexit was etc etc etc
On 20 November 2014, Nicola Sturgeon became First Minister of Scotland, succeeding Alex Salmond, who had resigned after defeat in the Scottish Independence referenfum. She is the first woman to hold this position. In March 2023, Sturgeon resigned as First Minister and was succeeded by Humza Yousaf. According to Wikipedia, she said that her resignation was because of the emotional toll the role took on her and for the false internet rumours about her sexuality and personal life. But, if I remember correctly, there was a good deal of furore at the time of her resignation about a transgender (male!) Scottish rapist being incarcerated in a women’s prison.
So for balance and impartiality, here’s one of the most scurrilous rumours being spread by horrible people. Such people are suggesting that Scotland’s previous First Lady is a vagitarian who realised that a single woman could never reach the highest position in Scottish politics, especially given the rumours about her personal life. The story goes on to suggest that her 2010 marriage at the age of forty was a sham designed enable her to become First MInister. If this is the case (and I’m sure it’s not) this would have given her ‘husband’ an incredible lever to use against her should she ever find out about his tendency to so generously spend other people’s money on himself and his good lady wife.
According to the Scottish Daily Express, 75% of those who expressed an opinion believe that Sturgeon was lying when she claimed to know nothing about her husband’s theft of SNP money.
Anyway, there you have it, Mr Ofcom. Complete impartiality giving both sides of this story.
I have my own experience of what a corrupt nasty little country Scotland is. Many years ago, my uncle set up a small electronics manufacturing company in Inverness as he wanted to be near a brother who lived there. My uncle was promised generous grants from the HIDB (Highlands and Islands Development Board) which were keen to encourage manufacturing to move to the North of Scotland. But when the time came to pay out the HIDB grants my uncle was informed that quite a few bribes would have to be paid to the local ‘government mafia’ otherwise no money would be forthcoming.
Anyway, here’s Leo Kearse’s take on the whole sorry Sturgeon affair
Here they are. The two people who (IMHO) are doing the most to help the Manchester Messiah, Andrew ‘I-should-be-PM’ Burnham, win in the Makerfield by-election:
The current polling for the Makerfield by-election is:
LABOUR: 43%
REFORM: 40%
RESTORE: 7%
LIBDEMS: 4%
GREEN: 3%
CONSERVATIVE: 2%
So, the situation is clear. The by-election will be a fight between Labour’s Manchester Messiah, Andrew ‘make-me-pm’ Burnham, and Reform. None of the other parties have any chance of winning. But they can influence the result:
The Nigerian woman
Ms Badenoch – full name before marriage – Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke – should clearly not put up a candidate. The Tories have no chance of winning and may even lose their deposit. But to withdraw her candidate, Olukemi would be admitting that she has failed in her efforts to make the Conservatives electable. And she would also be admitting that Reform, and not the Tories, are the main proponents of conservative, pro-British policies. And that would damage her political career. So, Olukemi has a choice: does she put her own career or her concern for her country first?
It seems to an ignorant fool like myself that Olukemi has made her choice – me, me, me, me and to h*ll with what’s best for Britain!
Mr Rupert Loweand Restore
There seems (to an ignorant fool like myself) to be an awful lot of bad blood between Mr Lowe of ‘Restore’ and Mr Farage of ‘Reform’. I know that a lot of accusations were made about Mr Lowe’s behaviour which we are led to believe was the reason he left Reform. Personally I don’t believe the accusations. If my declining memory serves me correctly, I think the problem between Lowe and Reform arose over Lowe’s proposal that expelling tens of thousands of illegal migrants should form part of Reform’s policies. But other Reform figures – probably Farage, Tice and Yusuf – felt that this would be outside the Overton Window and thus would expose the party to accusations of racism, fascism, Naziism and worse by the UK-hating, Labour-adoring, diversity-worshipping BBC and the rest of the mainstream media. But, of course I may be wrong.
Whatever the reason for the rift between Lowe and Reform, it would seem (to an igniorant fool like myself) that Lowe is facing a similar conundrum to the fragrant Olukemi: does he put his own ego and personal grievances first and stand a candidate in the Makerfield by-election or does he put his concern for his country first and withdraw his candidate to give Reform a better chance of winning?
It seems to an ignorant fool like myself that Mr Lowe has made his choice – me, me, me, me and to h*ll with what’s best for Britain.
But hey, this is just my uninformed personal opinion (so please don’t sue me as I’ve only sold 4 copies of my books this month and so don’t have any money) that the two people doing the most to help the Manchester Messiah win in Makerfield aren’t even from the Labour Party. They are, in fact, the (IMHO) delightful Nigerian Olukemi and the (IMHO) rather angry Mr Lowe.
David Craig, on June 17th, 2026
