Archives

October 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Why your financial adviser is either a liar or a fool

If it were the case that cash (money held in a bank) usually outperformed shares (either shares held directly by savers or held by unit trusts) then most of us would be much better off leaving our savings in a bank rather than investing in stock markets, unit trusts, bonds, ETFs or whatever. But this would also mean that most of Britain’s 28,000 supposedly “independent” financial advisers (IFAs) would be out of a job. Personal finance journalists are constantly repeating the mantra that ‘over the longer term, with dividends reinvested, shares outperform cash’. Probably you’ll also hear the same tired old song from financial advisers. There is only one small problem – it’s a complete, total and utter lie!

I have always believed this lie till I read the excellent free book Monkey with a Pin. The data most journalists and financial advisers use to justify the ‘shares outperform cash’ lie is usually the Barclays Equity Gilt Study. I suppose we should have known the ‘shares outperform cash’ story was a lie just by the fact that Bob Diamond’s recidivist mis-selling Barclays Bank was the source. The trick Barclays play to come up with the ‘shares outperform cash’ lie is that when looking at cash, they don’t look at the interest we would get from 2- and 3-year higher interest bank and building society accounts. Instead the liars and mis-sellers at Barclays use UK Government Treasury Bills as what they call ‘cash’. These Treasury Bills are not available to ordinary savers like you and me, so to use them as a proxy for ‘cash’ is ridiculous. Moreover, the interest paid by 2-and 3-year higher interest deposit accounts is almost always much higher than Government Treasury Bills. If Barclays used the average interest paid by 2-and 3-year higher interest bank accounts, then for 80 of the last 100 years, cash would have easily outperformed shares. There was just a brief period of 20 years (the 1980s and 1990s) when shares outperformed cash. And this was because of a flood of babyboomer savings into unit trusts and pension funds. As the babyboomers retire and their money gets taken out of shares and pension funds, we can expect falls in share prices. And, of course, Barclays don’t take account of the £150m a day we suckers pay in fees, commissions and many other charges to IFAs, unit trust bosses and pension fund managers

So, if your financial adviser ever claims that ‘over the longer term shares outperform cash’ either they are knowingly lying to you or else they are so stupid that they don’t even know that the ‘shares outperform cash’ is just another Barclays con to get us to put money into their worthless stock-market savings schemes.

“Liar and thief” (in my opinion) Warsi makes Carry On Conservatives omnishambles even worse

It appears that the Tory Party’s token Muslim has been caught with both hands in the till. Of course, this will all be explained away as an “oversight”. I’m not sure what exactly was the “oversight” – that Baroness Warsi had the key to someone’s house but forgot she had it? That the honourable lady slept somewhere and forgot she had done so? That the Baroness then apparently claimed expenses while not incurring any? Or that she got caught? It is actually incredible that someone could be so greedy and so stupid to be caught fiddling what must be the most lax expenses system in the world. A peer only has to spend one night a month in their supposed “main home” to be allowed to claim £300 or so a day every time they come to London. And there’s no need to show any receipts as all peers are so honourable. To be caught cheating this is almost beyond belief.

Actually, we all know that most MPs and peers are liars and thieves. So most of us won’t be surprised by the good Baroness’s venality. But the Warsi farce is dangerous to Liar Cameron because it reinforces the impression of an incompetent, arrogant, dishonest, out-of-touch government full of fools and thieves that is fumbling and blundering at the mercy of events and cannot by any stretch of the imagination be considered to be in control of anything. Cameron is an incompetent, a liar  and a fool. He had the opportunity to rescue the country after the worst PM in our history, Gordon Brown, almost bankrupted us. But Cameron has betrayed us and seems to have spent his efforts enriching his friends and cronies rather than governing the country. He is so despised and even loathed by the majority of people, that he should resign and spend more time with his family. Come on Liar Cameron, do the only honourable thing you have ever done in your miserable, self-serving life and resign.

Bumped into David Miliband – what an “arrogant, greedy, self-serving, hypocritical, selfish, money-grabbing scumbag” he is (in my opinion)

I happened to meet David Miliband this week as we were both being interviewed on a TV news programme. He was happy to answer all the interviewer’s questions. But when I asked how he could serve his constituents while earning about £500,000 a year for himself, he didn’t answer that question and brushed rudely past me. David “Money” Miliband is meant to be a socialist, I think, so let’s look at where he gets some of his money. He seems to get fairly frequent payments of about £60,000 to £65,000 from the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs. As far as I know. the UAE is not a great place for democracy and democratic protest. In fact, if you do protest it’s probably cattle prod and genitals time. The main sport in the UAE is treating workers from the Third World almost as slaves and raping and beating Filipino maids. But none of that seems to worry David “Money” Miliband. After all, he gets loads of money from the UAE.

Other people who have helped David “Money” Miliband become considerably richer than the constituents he is meant to be working for include consultants McKinseys, Accenture and KPMG all of whom earned probably billions when Mr Miliband’s New Labour wasted about £70bn of our money on their favourite consultants. But here you can see for yourself how money keeps pouring into David “Money” Miliband’s pockets https://www.theyworkforyou.com/regmem/?p=11113. How does such a busy man ever have time to work for the people he’s meant to be working for?

I’m sure Mr Miliband is a hard-working, honest, selfless man who strains every sinew to do what he can for the suckers who voted for him. But as far as I can see, he is (in my opinion) just an “arrogant, self-serving, hypocritical, selfish, money-grabbing scumbag”

Don’t get conned by your bank’s supposed “savings” products. And zuckers get fleeced

Today, high-street bank customers will be presuaded to put about £32m into a savings scheme known in the industry as “structured products”. Then tomorrow another £32m will go in and so on, probably for the rest of the year. With interest rates still below the level of inflation, bank customers are easy targets for commission-hungry bank staff out to increase their own salaries and promotion prospects by flogging “structured products” to their customers. Typically, a structured product will promise to return about 120% of any increase in the stock market over about five years, but will guarantee to return the customer’s capital in full if the stock market falls.

The main problem is that over 80% of the benefit of stock-market investing comes from the dividends paid by the companies whose shares you buy – not from any increases in the overall market. Yet these structured products don’t give customers any dividends – often because they never actually buy any shares. It seems that most customers don’t understand this. In about five years there are going to be many hundreds of thousands of surprised bank customers when they find their supposed “savings” scheme has not increased at all. In fact, they will have lost money due to inflation.

However, there may be one structured product that could work. Some banks are offering returns of 8% or more a year if the stock market is higher each year than when customers first invested. With the market down below 5300 at the moment, these products might actually pay out.

Meanwhile, as we learn more about Facebook’s IPO and how the big investors got out while the going was good by “pumping” the share price and concealing poor revenue growth forecasts, once again ordinary savers find out that stock markets are rigged against them. The rich get richer, the poor get fleeced. If you happen to own Facebook shares, be prepared for a fall to around $10 to $15 per share – somewhat below the IPO price of $38. No wonder, Mark Zuckerberg is always grinning.

Is Tory ‘MP’ Simon Reevell (Dewsbury) taking the p… – and does he ever work for the fools who voted for him?

Tory MP for Dewsbury, Simon Reevell – no, I’d never heard of him either – is well below the average level for MPs in voting, giving speeches and asking questions. So is he just lazy? Not at all. In fact he seems to have been very busy – earning lots of extra money for himself in addition to his generous MP salary, expenses and pension. Lucky man? Greedy man? Who knows.

Barrister in receipt of legal aid payments as follows:

£1,609.93 plus VAT received 5 May 2011 for 26 hours work, 3 appearances and 2 additional conferences between 30 November 2010 and 25 March 2011. (Registered 10 May 2011)
£50 plus VAT received 10 May 2011 for 1 appearance on 9 March 2011. (Registered 10 May 2011)
11 May 2011, £1,296.95 plus VAT in respect of two court appearances and one meeting and a total of 9 hours work between 13 December 2010 and 28 March 2011. (Registered 18 May 2011)
6 May 2011, £500 plus VAT in respect of one meeting, two court appearances and 4 hours work between 14 July 2010 and 2 September 2010. (Registered 18 May 2011)
18 May 2011, £135 plus VAT in respect of one hearing on 14 December 2010. (Registered 9 June 2011)
1 June 2011, £753.05 plus VAT in respect of two hearings and 6 hours work between 24 March and 16 May 2011. (Registered 9 June 2011)
6 June 2011, £425 plus VAT in respect of 9 hours work including an appeal hearing between 24 November 2010 and 5 April 2011. (Registered 9 June 2011) 24 November 2011, £125 plus VAT additional payment received in respect of this work. (Registered 28 November 2011)
10 June 2011, £1,791.79 plus VAT in respect of 5 appearances and 11 hours work between 5 January and 16 May 2011. (Registered 12 June 2011)
29 June 2011, £225 plus VAT criminal legal aid in respect of 3.5 hours work between 17 January and 6 March 2011. (Registered 4 July 2011)
6 July 2011, £1,263.26 for 9 hours work and 2 court appearances between 17 March 2011 and 15 April 2011. (Registered 11 July 2011)
20 July 2011, £679.02 plus VAT for 3 hours work and 2 court appearances between 15 April and 23 May 2011. (Registered 25 July 2011)
20 July 2011, £656.40 plus VAT for 3 hours work and 2 court appearances between 1 April and 23 May 2011. (Registered 25 July 2011)
27 August 2011, £160.51 plus VAT for 1 hours advice in conference plus travel, 13 December 2010. (Registered 26 September 2011)
6 September 2011, £125 plus VAT in respect of one court appearance on 20 February 2004. (Registered 26 September 2011)
5 September 2011, £137 plus VAT outstanding balance on work completed between 1 April 2011 and 23 May 2011. (Registered 26 September 2011)
£1,209.01 plus VAT for 5 hours work and two appearances between 22 May 2011 and 24 June 2011. (Registered 10 October 2011)
19 October 2011, £824.50 plus VAT for 3 hours work and one court appearance between 18 June and 15 August 2011. (Registered 24 October 2011)
£1,209.01 plus VAT received 6 October 2011 and £548.20 plus VAT received 13 October 2011 in respect of 2 court appearances and 3 hours work between 25 May 2011 and 24 June 2011 (same case paid in two payments). (Registered 24 October 2011)
26 October 2011, £944 plus VAT for 2 appearances and 4 hours work between 28 January 2011 and 18 August 2011. (Registered 10 November 2011)
26 October 2011, £533.77 plus VAT for 1 appearance and 1 hours work between 25 June 2011 and 1 August 2011. (Registered 10 November 2011)
9 November 2011, £1,545.73 plus VAT for 2 court hearings and 4.5 hours work between 1 August 2011 and 27 October 2011. (Registered 10 November 2011)
21 December 2011, £112.16 plus VAT in respect of 4 hours work and one hearing 20 September 2011. (Registered 30 December 2011)
22 December 2011, £350 plus VAT in respect of 3.5 hours work between 18 and 24 August 2011. (Registered 9 January 2012)
18 January 2012, £1,418 plus VAT in respect of 22 hours work between 1 August and 8 December 2011 and one court appearance. (Registered 23 January 2012)
24 January 2012, 3350 plus VAT in respect of one appearance and 3.5 hours work between 10 January 2012 and 24 January 2012. (Registered 20 February 2012)
25 January 2012, £9,360.09 plus VAT in respect of five appearances and 30 hours work between September 2010 and November 2011. (Registered 20 February 2012)
25 January 2012, £1,091.20 plus VAT in respect of 2 appearances and 4 hours work between 1 June 2011 and 11 November 2011. (Registered 20 February 2012)
3 February 2012, £149.50 plus VAT in respect of one appearance on 25 November 2011. (Registered 20 February 2012)
16 February 2012, £205.36 plus VAT in respect of one appearance on 4 October 2010. (Registered 20 February 2012)
9 March 2012, £874.34 plus VAT in respect of 4 hours work and one appearance between 26 September 2011 and 3 October 2011. (Registered 19 March 2012)
4 April 2012, £771.34 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and two appearances between 15 January 2012 and 20 February 2012. (Registered 5 April 2012)
4 April 2012, £274 plus VAT in respect of 2 hours work between 10 February 2012 and 13 February 2012. (Registered 5 April 2012)
19 April 2012, £990 plus VAT additional payment in respect of case paid 20 July 2010. (Registered 22 April 2012)
Payments from Northern Rail for teaching advocacy and procedure to their prosecuting team, legal advice and court work. Address: Debt Recovery and Prosecutions Unit, 16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Bartley Wood, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UY:
£411.86 plus VAT received 11 April 2011 part payment in respect of advocacy training comprising 9 hours work between 1 January 2011 and 11 March 2011. (Registered 11 April 2011) Further payment of £569.27 plus VAT received 3 May 2011. (Registered 18 May 2011)
28 April 2011, £375 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours written advice regarding a prosecution on 20 April 2011. (Registered 18 May 2011)
28 April 2011, £500 plus VAT in respect of 4 hours written advice regarding a prosecution between 18 April 2011 and 27 April 2011. (Registered 18 May 2011)
10 June 2011, £275 plus VAT for 1 days court booking. (Registered 12 June 2011)
10 June 2011, £193.87 plus VAT remainder of earlier fee for training course. (Registered 12 June 2011)
13 July 2011, £125 plus VAT in respect of 1 hour written advice re prosecutions on 3 June 2011. (Registered 18 July 2011)
12 August 2011, £275 plus VAT in respect of 4 hours work and one court appearance between 20 July and 1 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
12 August 2011, £250 plus VAT in respect of 2 hours work between 20 July and 1 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
12 August 2011, £125 plus VAT in respect of 1 hours work on 4 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
12 August 2011, £468.75 plus VAT in respect of 3.75 hours work between 1 July and 4 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
5 September 2011, £968.75 plus VAT in respect of written opinion, 7.75 hours between 25 June 2011 and 6 July 2011. (Registered 26 September 2011)
7 October 2011, received £1,428 plus VAT in respect of 7 hours 45 minute work and one days presentation between 16 and 22 August 2011. (Registered 10 October 2011)
7 October 2011, received £275 plus VAT for one court appearance on 30 August 2011. (Registered 10 October 2011)
21 October 2011, received £1,443.75 plus VAT for written advice, 8.25 hours work between 10 and 21 September 2011. (Registered 24 October 2011)
29 December 2011, received £550 plus VAT in respect of 1 hours meeting and 1 days trial between 10 November and 21 December 2011. (Registered 9 January 2012)
20 March 2012, received £550 plus VAT in respect of prosecuting training course, 9 hours plus presentation between 1 November 2011 and 9 February 2012. (Registered 5 April 2012)
11 April 2012, £1050 plus VAT final payment in respect of training course 9 February 2012 (initial payment 20 March 2012). (Registered 12 April 2012)
Payments from Probation Service, 71-73 Great Peter Street, London SW1P 2BN:
£150 plus VAT received 10 May 2011 for 1 appearance on 20 January 2011. (Registered 10 May 2011)
£150 plus VAT received 10 May 2011 for 1 appearance on 16 March 2011. (Registered 10 May 2011)
3 May 2011, £332 plus VAT received for privately paid military disciplinary case involving 3 hours 55 minutes written work between 8 December 2010 and 2 February 2011. (Registered 10 May 2011)
10 June 2011, £1,000 plus VAT in respect of 11 hours work and one hearing appearance for a private civil case between 16 April and 26 May 2011. (Registered 12 June 2011)
10 June 2011, £437.50 plus VAT in respect of 2.5 hours work for a private civil case between 23 and 26 May 2011. (Registered 12 June 2011)
13 June 2011, £281.25 plus VAT in respect of 2.25 hours work between 25 May and 1 June 2011. (Registered 21 June 2011)
20 July 2011, £1,650 plus VAT for 5 hours work and full day’s trial between 18 February and 23 February 2011 for a private civil case. (Registered 25 July 2011)
Payments from Crown Prosecution Service. Address: Rose Court, 2 Southwark Bridge, London SE1 9HS:
22 June 2011, payment of £99.50 plus VAT in respect of one court hearing.. (Registered 11 July 2011)
13 July 2011, payment of £376.80 plus VAT for 3 hours work and one court appearance between 16 April and 18 April 2011. (Registered 18 July 2011)
15 August 2011, payment of £85 plus VAT in respect of one court appearance on 8 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
19 September 2011, £1,247.37 plus VAT in respect of 3 day trial 5-7 September 2011. (Registered 26 September 2011)
18 October 2011, £46.50 plus VAT for one court appearance on 2 September 2011. (Registered 24 October 2011)
14 November 2011, £7,543.26 plus VAT for 17 hours work and one court appearance between 6 and 10 October 2011. (Registered 16 November 2011)
8 December 2011, £100 plus VAT in respect of one hearing 8 August 2011. (Registered 18 December 2011)
19 December 2011, £46.50 plus VAT in respect of one hearing 11 November 2011. (Registered 30 December 2011)
19 January 2012, £60 plus VAT in respect of one appearance on 5 January 2012. (Registered 23 January 2012)
12 January 2012, £303.89 plus VAT in respect of one hours work and one court appearance 19 December 2011. (Registered 30 January 2012)
£420.18 plus VAT in respect of three hours work and one court appearance between 28 December 2011 and 4 January 2012. (Registered 30 January 2012)
13 February 2012, £264.66 plus VAT in respect of two appearances between 19 December 2011 and 26 January 2012. (Registered 20 February 2012)
13 February 2012, £1,748.19 plus VAT in respect of 6 hours work and one appearance between 9 and 12 December 2011. (Registered 20 February 2012)
1 March 2012, £436.85 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and one court appearance between 7 and 14 February 2012. (Registered 4 March 2012)
1 March 2012, received £338.76 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and one court appearance between 8 and 15 November 2011. (Registered 4 March 2012)
24 February 2012, £55.80 plus VAT in respect of one appearance on 3 February 2012. (Registered 19 March 2012)
7 March 2012, £198.22 plus VAT in respect of 1 hours work and one appearance on 5 January 2012. (Registered 19 March 2012)
7 March 2012, £574.52 plus VAT in respect of 4 hours work and one appearance between 20 and 26 January 2012. (Registered 19 March 2012)
13 March 2012, £441.79 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and one appearance between 20 and 28 February 2012. (Registered 19 March 2012)
22 March 2012, £511.83 plus VAT in respect of two appearances and three hours work between 3 January 2012 and 4 February 2012. (Registered 9 April 2012)
2 April 2012, £249.96 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and one court appearance between 11 and 13 January 2012. (Registered 12 April 2012)
5 April 2012, £46.50 plus VAT in respect of one court appearance on 22 March 2012. (Registered 12 April 2012)
10 April 2012, £797.94 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and one court appearance between 1 and 6 March 2012. (Registered 12 April 2012)
16 April 2012, £66.50 plus VAT in respect of one court appearance on 16 January 2012. (Registered 22 April 2012)
23 April 2012, £1598.02 plus VAT in respect of 6 hours work and one court appearance between 2 and 3 April 2012. (Registered 26 April 2012)
23 April 2012, £1193.27 plus VAT in respect of 4 hours work and one court appearance between 28 March and 11 April 2012. (Registered 26 April 2012)
7 July 2011, £575 plus VAT for written advice taking 4 hours relating to a private case between 20 May 2011 and 1 June 2011. (Registered 11 July 2011)
Payments from Armed Forces Criminal Legal Aid Authority (AFCLAA). Address: Building 398c Room 10, Trenchard Lines, Upavon, Pewsey, Wiltshire SN9 6BE:
27 June 2011, payment of £1,096 plus VAT from for one meeting, two appearances, eight hours work between 20 March 2011 and 24 May 2011. (Registered 18 July 2011)
21 July 2011, £1,033.70 plus VAT for 7 hours work and 3 appearances between 4 May 2011 and 20 June 2011. (Registered 25 July 2011)
13 September 2011, £864.02 plus VAT in respect of 2 hearings and 5 hours work between 26 July 2011 and 12 August 2011 plus travel. (Registered 26 September 2011)
22 September 2011, £43.50 plus VAT in respect of advice on appeal 1 hour, 2 September 2011. (Registered 26 September 2011)
21 November 2011, £1,009 plus VAT in respect of three appearances and 4 hours work between 1 April 2011 and 12 October 2011. (Registered 28 November 2011)
16 April 2012, £653.04 plus VAT in respect of 3 hours work and two court appearances between 1 February 2012 and 16 March 2012. (Registered 22 April 2012)
Payment from West Yorkshire Probation Service, PO Box 81, Cliffe Hill House, Sandy Walk, Wakefield WF21 2DJ:
£54 plus VAT received 18 August 2011 in respect of one court appearance on 8 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
£78 plus VAT received 18 August 2011 in respect of one court appearance on 8 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
£78 plus VAT received 18 August 2011 in respect of one court appearance on 8 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
£54 plus VAT received 18 August 2011 in respect of one court appearance on 8 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
£78 plus VAT received 18 August 2011 in respect of one court appearance on 8 August 2011. (Registered 26 August 2011)
£54 plus VAT received 10 April 20112 in respect of one appearance 21 March 2012. (Registered 12 April 2012)
2 August 2011, £690 plus VAT for 5 hours work and 1 court appearance between 5 May and 11 May 2011, in respect of a private civil case. (Registered 26 August 2011)
9 September 2011, £500 plus VAT for 6 hours work in respect of a private case. (Registered 26 September 2011)
13 October 2011, £724.45 plus VAT for 2.5 hours work and two court appearances between 18 June and 29 July 2011. (Registered 24 October 2011)
3 November 2011, £1,000 plus VAT from Royal Mail Group, c/o Bond Pearce LLP, 3 Temple Quay, Bristol, for 6 hours written advice between 5 and 15 July 2011. (Registered 10 November 2011)
14 November 2011, £102 plus VAT in respect of one court appearance on 6 October 2011. (Registered 16 November 2011)
23 November 2011, £600 plus VAT in respect of three hours work and one appearance between 12 November 2011 and 18 November 2011. (Registered 28 November 2011)
30 November 2011, £350 plus VAT in respect of one hearing 12 October 2011. Private client. (Registered 18 December 2011)
27 March 2012, £1035 plus VAT in respect of a private civil case; half day trial 22 December 2011. (Registered 9 April 2012)

Dear Mr Osborne, if you weren’t such a pompous fool, you could help grow Britain’s economy

Every day, pundits and other self-professed ‘experts’ are keen to tell us how to save Britain’s collapsing economy. And now the geniuses at the Taxpayers Alliance (TPA) – many of whom have never had a proper job in their lives – have produced their great solution. They’ve got some things right – for example, the optimum level of tax for an economy to grow is around 33%. Anything above that stifles growth, anything below leaves the public sector underfunded. But the TPA’s proposals are too complex and too wideranging to be implementable. However, there is one thing the Government could do quickly to boost economic growth – scrap corporation tax.

Like the beard tax and the hat tax of the 1600s and 1700s, corporation tax has outlived its usefulness. In the 2000-2007 Brown boom, tax paid by small companies went up by 132%, but tax paid by large companies only went up by 5%. Why? Because large companies can use all kinds of tricks to cut their tax. So the tax burden falls unfairly on small companies, yet they are the ones that can reduce unemployment and boost growth. If every small company took on just one person, unemployment would fall by over a million, benefits claims would drop dramatically and income tax paid would go up. Corporation tax should be replaced by the Government retaining a percentage of VAT that would otherwise be repaid to businesses. This would slash tax evasion (as the authorities would already hold the money) and make large companies and those using places like the Cayman Islands and Jersey as their supposed HQs pay their fair share of tax. Moreover, it would make Britain the best country in the world to base a business, bringing many companies to Britain and creating hundreds of thousands of well-paid jobs. You can find out more in my MoneyWeek article Scrap the modern-day beard tax https://www.moneyweek.com/news-and-charts/economics/uk/david-craig-scrap-the-modern-day-beard-tax-57636 and you could even send the link to the hopelessly out of his depth Mr Osborne

Ignore gobby Irish ‘hypocrites’ Bono and Saint Bob

For years, we’ve had to put up with loudmouthed Irish (in my opinion) ‘hypocrites’ Bono and Saint Bob Geldorf yabbering on about how our governments should do more to help alleviate poverty in the Third World. Their blethering has had these two multi-milllionaire (in my opinion) buffoons invited to meet most of the important world leaders as they pose and preen themselves in the warmth of their own self-importance and self-righteousness. But while preaching to the rest of us that more of our tax money should be handed over to corrupt African politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen, these two gobby Irish multimillionaires seem to have been less than keen to put their own money where their big mouths are. Both these extremely rich men appear to have hired expensive accountants to ensure that they minimise their own tax payments, while angrily demanding that the rest of us pay more to be stolen by corrupt Africans. And, by the way, Mr Bono, how much of your newly acquired Facebook hundreds of millions will you be giving to starving Africans?

So, on the basis that these two bigmouthed, Irish, self-appointed moralisers appear to be (in my opinion) just greedy, self-serving hypocrites and on the basis that repeated UN studies have shown that around 90% of all aid to Africa gets stolen by corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen or wasted due to the utter incompetence of those who are tasked with spending it, we should ignore pretty much everything self-appointed Saints Bob and Bono tell us.

Liar Cameron knows nothing, understands nothing, learns nothing, does nothing

As NATO’s useless, lying leaders meet in Chicago to try to find a face-saving way out of the disastrous Afghanistan failure, our ‘heroic’ PM, David Liar Cameron is pompously/bravely/stupidly (delete as appropriate) announcing that he is ready to send British troops to Syria. It’s truly beyond belief. This total tosser wants to get British troops embroiled in yet another Muslim-kills-Muslim slaughterhouse. After Cameron’s great ‘victory’ in Libya, he has become like Blair after his intervention in Sierre Leone – addicted to war. Unable to do anything to improve Britain’s economy, Cameron wants to use force in foreign interventions to show what a great international statesman he is. Have you understood nothing, Mr Cameron? Have you learnt nothing, Mr Cameron? If the Shiites hate the Sunnis hate the Alawites hate the Hittites hate the Palestinianites etc, it’s not our problem. If they want to kill each other, we should sell them the weapons and let them get on with it and long may they continue massacring each other. If we try to stop the Stupidites all killing each other, they’ll just start hating us even more than they hate each other.

So, Mr Liar, bring our troops home and put them to work in our schools and on our council estates to help improve our collapsing society. And, as for the economy – put all civil servants on a 3-day week; set a maximum public-sector pension of £25,000; set a maximum public-sector salary of £100,000; cut the number of thieving, pointless MPs from 646 to 250; abolish corporation tax completely; demand the EU cuts its budget by 5% a year for the next five years; extend Britain’s fishing limits to 200 miles around our coasts; build some nuclear power stations; scrap the high-speed rail project; get rid of your advisers as they’re as hopeless as you; scrap the Equality and Human Rights Commission; scrap the incompetent Office for Budget Responsibility; demand Ofwat and Ofgem set a maximum profit level of 10% for water and power companies; declare all water and power resources a strategic national asset that can only be owned by British companies based for tax purposes in Britain; take legal action against Fred Goodwin for misleading shareholders, false accounting and fraud – basically, Mr Liar Cameron, do something useful for Britain. Oh, and one other thing, the most useful thing you could do would be to resign as most people in Britain view you with derision and contempt. LOL

Don’t get ‘zuckered’ by Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook

Hype, hype, hooray! I guess that’s what the founding shareholders of Facebook and their investment bankers will be shouting as they crack open the champagne after unloading their largely worthless shares on all the usual suckers who think they’re going to make money by jumping on the latest bandwagon just as the bubble’s about to burst (sorry about the mixed metaphors). At the IPO valuation, Facebook is supposedly worth about $104bn! Ha, ha, ha and Santa Claus is my uncle. Well, certainly he’s Mark Zuckerberg’s uncle, as Zuckerberg will pocket about $19bn. If you translated Zuckerberg’s name into English, I guess you’d get “sugar mountain”. But more accurate would be “mountain of suckers”. Because that’s what he and his investment bankers are making of the fools stupid enough to buy Facebook shares. The average IPO is usually heavily hyped, overpriced and extremely disappointing. The average share sold in an IPO underperforms the market by over 20%. As for Facebook – most shares trade at a P/E (Price/Earnings) ratio of about 13 in the UK and 15 in the US. Facebook’s shares are on a P/E ratio of about 100. Basically, compared to its share price, the company hardly makes any money. It may have hundreds of millions of self-obsessed, celebrity-fixated users, but it doesn’t know how to transform these into hard cash earnings. I predict that within a year, Mr Sugar Mountain’s shares will have lost at least a third, and more probably half, of their value. Many companies do IPOs when they know that their shares are at the absolute top end of their valuations and can only go down. But, while the zuckers scratch their heads and wonder why their money has gone up in smoke, Mr Zuckerberg and his mates will be laughing all the way to their many many banks.

So please, please don’t get caught up in the media-generated hysteria, don’t buy Mr Zuckerberg’s crap shares and don’t get ‘zuckered’ by the master of ‘zuckering’ Mr Zuckerberg. If you want to throw your money away, give some to me. I need it because I’ve been blacklisted from working as a consultant since I started writing my books. As for Mr Zuckerberg, he doesn’t need your money quite as much as I do.

London Olympics – Britain’s most expensive riot?

As the politically-correct BBC gushes about Britain’s “Olympics triumph” and multimillionaire olympocrats become ever richer wasting our money, it’s worth remembering that we were once promised the Olympics would only cost us around £2.4bn. Mysteriously, as the BBC and Olympics bosses tell us that they are “on budget”, the cost has actually rocketed up  to around £10bn. That’s about enough to pay the salaries of around 30,000 police officers or nurses for 10 years.  As other countries have to cut public spending, the rest of the world is laughing at us for being stupid enough to waste so much money on so little while hugely enriching a few Olympics insiders. Here’s a spoof ad for the Olympics I saw recently when I was in Australia. Enjoy and send the link to your contacts if you think they might be interested.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_G34SK3dkc