For years, the snobbish British elites and the prostitute UK mainstream media hurled every insult they could think of at Donald Trump. Even as it was becoming possible that Trump might win the 2024 election, the supposedly respected Times newspaper was still calling mim “a twice impeached, convicted felon”. The Times, of course, forgot to mention that both impeachments were just attempts by mouth-frothing, Trump-loathing Democrats to sabotage Trump’s presidency. As for the supposed “convicted felon” accusation – this was just a small part of the trunami of lawsuits launched against Trump by terrified Democrats to try to prevent him running in the 2024 election.
Now that Trump is back in the White House, we’re witnessing an epic of grovelling from those who had been so quick to insult him.
But it seems that our supposedly ‘intellectually-superior’ British elites have learnt nothing from their failed attempts to damage Trump with all their infantile abuse.
A few days ago, after the disastrous Trump and Vance meeting with Zelensky, European leaders had a panicked meeting to pledge their support for Ukraine. On hearing this, Vice President Vance made a ‘yeah, you and whose army’ type of comment. In fact, I think he said ‘sending 20,000 troops from some random country which has not fought a war for 30 to 40 years’ is not going to be sufficient to deter Russia. And if we think about, say, the Belgian army (do the mussel-munchers even have an army?), the Dutch army who ran away from a few Serb irregulars leaving the inhabitants of Srebrenica to be slaughtered, the Spanish army (not known for their military prowess), the Greek army (do they still wear skirts?) – well, JD Vance seems to have point.
However, the British press working seemingly in concert all accused Vance of being historically ignorant and of insulting all those British soldiers who had been killed or injured in dumps like Iraq and Afghanistan even though Vance had said “from some random country” and had not mentioned Britain by name. In fct, the Daily Express went so far as to claim that Vance had called Britain “some random country” – a claim that is totally false. Oh, and while we’re on the subject of the Daily Express, admittedly not the world’s most intellectual newspaper nor a reliable source of news, as I write this blog, there are no fewer than 5 articles on the Daily Express website attacking Vance for things he said, what Trump said about him and even about the type of trousers Vance was wearing. This is worse than pathetic.
From what little I know, JD Vance is a truly extraordinary individual. He has overcome huge hardship to achieve what he has. He is both a distinguished former soldier and a highly-educated man. Given this, the UK manstream media’s anti-Vance pile-on is, I believe, both uninformed and unjustified.
But even worse, I believe that Trump is going to be one of the best presidents America has ever had. Almost single-handedly he is going to defeat the cancer of woke garbage and self-hatred which is destroying much of the West. And when the next US election comes around, the winner and next president is going to be JD Vance.
So, I politely suggest to the arrogant UK elites and the prostitute, do-anything-for-money UK mainstream media that they cool the anti-Vance rhetoric. Otherwise they will have to do another round of sycophantic grovelling when JD Vance moves into the White House as president in about four years time.
And here, to support my belief that JD Vance is a thoughtful and impressive individual, is a shortish intervew he did with Sean Hannity explaining the White House bust-up with Zelensky:
One of the most controversial subjects one could mention is whether there are genetic differences between different races. For example, does one race tend to be more intelligent than another? That’s a complete taboo. Or does one race tend to do better at sport than another? I guess that’s another taboo.
Fortunately this question has now been answered. There is scientific proof that black people are superior in every way to white people. The reason is, from what I understand, that black people are ‘pure homo sapiens’ while white people have a mixture of homo sapiens and neanderthal genes which makes them inferior.
This would no doubt explain why pretty much all humanity’s greatest discoveries, scientific achievements and artistic masterpieces have been created by black people. It would also explain why the world’s richest, most successful, least corrupt and most dynamic countries are all in Africa. Here’s a chart of various regions’ gdp per capita:
If you turn the chart upside down, you’ll see that countries in subequatorial Africa have constantly had the highest gdp per capita while gdp per capita in white countries has been declining.
Anyway, in the first 2 minutes of the video (link below) you’ll get the full scientific explanation why black people are superior to white people in every way.
I imagine that every time they hear of a company, especially a manufacturing company, going bankrupt due to Rachel ‘never-been-an-economist’ Reeves’s massive tax hikes on employee National insurance, Angela ‘Lenin’ Rayners’ workers’ rights lunacy and mad Ed ‘been-a-failure-all-his-life’ Miliband giving us the highest energy prices in the world, there’s probably a massive celebration at Labour HQ. After all, for the Labour student politics politicians who now ruin our country, private businesses are ruthless exploiters of working people and so the fewer private businesses there are, the better it is for Britain. In fact, for the dolts now running our government, the more people work for the unproductive, self-serving, overpaid, over-pensioned, parasitic public sector, the greater will be the country’s economic growth.
When she supposedly studied economics, Reeves, if she actually attended any lectures and wasn’t skiving off to work as a Labour activist, would have learnt all about things like supply and demand curves and price elasticity of demand and suchlike:
But there’s a not insignificant problem – what is taught in theoretical economics is nothing like what actually happens in the real world.
In Rachel ‘chess-champion’ Reeves’s genius brain, if demand for a product falls, then supply will fall. Similarly if demand increases, supply will increase. Simples, as a meerkat (who is probably much better at economics than Rachel Reeves) might say.
But let’s take the case of a theoretical UK factory. Reeves’s national insurance increases, Rayners’ new employee rights and crazed Ed ‘lifelong failure’ Miliband’s world-beating energy costs cause that factory to raise its prices. Due to price elasticity of demand, demand for that factory’s products falls as foreign competitors, not burdened by Labour’s assault on business, can supply the same product cheaper. What happens then? The factory closes, hundreds of the working people Labour claim to represent lose their jobs and the work that factory did moves to China or some other country with much cheaper workers and much lower energy costs. But if demand for that product increases, the UK factory doesn’t magically re-open again. The factory is gone, the skilled workers are gone and the factory’s customers are now going to new suppliers and will never return.
And that in a nutshell is the small problem with Labour’s vengeful strategy of wrecking what little is left of British manufacturing to punish business and to force most of the population to either work in the public sector or else be dependent on goverment handouts to survive. Real economics, what is apparently called ‘behavioural economics’ doesn’t follow the same pattern as the depressingly little theoretical economics Rachel ‘congenital liar’ Reeves might have learnt at Oxford.
In the real world, de-industrialisation is a one-way street leading to national bankruptcy. The problem for us is, if we can ever get rid of this bunch of charlatans, liars and incompetents, will there be anything left of Britain’s economy on which to rebuild.
As President Donald Trump tries to stop the slaughter in Ukraine, he has been lambasted as everything from a Neville Chamberlain to a Putin puppet to a friend of dictators to the world’s worst negotiator for supposedly making concessions to Russia before negotiations even started.
Trump’s critics, who all appear to consider themselves experts on international negotiations, seem to me to have forgotten that, before Trump’s current attempts to end the Ukraine war, Europe and the ever so progressive ever so liberal Biden administration had three years to end the war and did pretty much nothing. In fact, there are many who believe that a peace with Russia could have been negotiated two and a half years ago, but that Boris Johnson was sent as the West’s bag-carrier to persuade Zelensky that Ukraine should fight on rather than negotiate. Moreover, I don’t remember all the supposed ‘experts’ criticising European leaders and the Biden administration for their failure to end the Ukraine war for the last three years of bloodshed.
Here are just a few titles of Times Radio podcasts about Trump’s attempts to end the war:
Trump HQ in chaos as it divides over Ukraine policy
Trump is destroying Western unity as he ‘cosies’ up to Putin
Trump’s problems mount as he turns his back on allies
Trump’s ‘bonkers’ demand for billions in Ukraine’s rare earth minerals explained
Trump’s ‘strategic stupidity’ towards Putin has China making dangerous plans
Putin will take war to Europe after plunging US in turmoil
UK must prepare for war footing as world edges closer to WWIII
Trump’s ‘short-sighted’ Ukraine plan thrusts US leadership into chaos
There are plenty more like this, but I imagine you get the picture.
All these Trump-loathing ‘experts’ interviewed by Times Radio may be right. Perhaps Trump is a cowardly appeaser. Perhaps Putin has some ‘kompromat’ on him. Perhaps Trump is the world’s worst negotiator.
But there is possibly another explanation for America’s proposals to end the war. Perhaps the Trump administration are playing the 21st century’s version of ‘The Great Game’.
‘The Great Game’
‘The Great Game’ was a rivalry between the 19th-century British and Russian empires over influence in Central Asia, primarily in Afghanistan, Persia, and Tibet. But, I believe the expression can also be used more generally to describe the major powers jostling with each other for control of countries and resources. In the 20th century, ‘The Great Game’ was primarily the worldwide conflict between the West and the Soviet Union. This spread throughout the MIddle East, Asia, Africa and South America as the West’s and Soviet Union’s proxies fought local wars.
In the 21st century, ‘The Great Game’ will be played mainly between the USA and an increasingly hungry and belligerent China. The Chinese are not just a threat to American power, they are also colonising many other countries such as Australia and New Zealand and large parts of Africa. Moreover, China is a threat to Russia’s resource-rich, underpopulated Far East. What the Trump administrataion may have realised is that Russia may not be our real enemy, that China is the real enemy and that, as Russians may have more in common with the USA than with the Chinese, now is the time to loosen Russia’s ties with (subordination to?) China and recruit Russia into the anti-Chinese camp.
If I am right, then morally the results aren’t going to be pretty. Putin will keep 20% of Ukrainian territory and maybe have most of the sanctions on Russia lifted. So a murderous dictator will emerge as a winner. But after WWll, America was more than delighted to grab as many Nazi scientists as it could to help build rockets and its space programme. Realpolitik is not something for sensitive pearl-clutchers.
Of course, I ain’t no geopolitical genius like all the experts endlessly mouthing off in our media. So I may be completely wrong. But I suspect this is what is really happening and that all the Trump-haters are too blinded by their loathing of Trump to understand that ending the Ukraine was is not just a local issue for the Americans, but is part of a new 21st century ‘Great Game’ – the struggle for global dominance between the USA and China.
Here’s a chart of Zimbabwe’s agricultural production as the country’s farms were expropriated from lazy, unproductive white farmers and handed over to hard-working, successful Black African farmers:
And here’s a chart of the amount of agricultural land under cultivation in South Africa as the country’s farms were expropriated from lazy, unproductive white farmers and handed over to hard-working, successful Black African farmers:
I wonder if anybody can spot a pattern?
And here’s a chart of the trend in gdp per capita by the main population areas of the world:
As you’ll see (if you turn the chart upside down) Black Africans and people from South Asia – precisely the people who are invading Britain – are smarter and more productive than white Europeans and Americans. So, our political, academic and media elites are quite right (if you turn the chart upside down) to believe that the more of these wonderful people who flood into our country, the more productive and richer we’ll all become.
How lucky we are to be led by such magnificent, talented, far-sighted, patriotic people such as Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Ed Davey, Tim Davie and Keir Starmer. A great future awaits our once great country.
After Reeves’s ‘recession made in Downing Street’ budget, for me one of the most revealing comments came from Darren Jones, Rachel Reeves’s deputy. Darren Jones, also known as “the human zit”, is the Chief Secretary to the Treasury. In his infinite wisdom and deep understanding of the complexities of a modern economy, Darren Jones suggested that businesses hit by the £20bn+ National Insurance tax increase should “suck it up”.
It’s often said that not a single member of lawyer Starmer’s government has ever worked in a company where they had to produce some goods or services which someone else wanted to buy. So they have absolutely no understanding of how businesses actually work.
Darren Jones’s comment that businesses would just have to “suck up” the massive tax hike he and Reeves imposed in their October 2024 budget seems to me to confirm our worst fears about this incompetent, business-hating government. Mr Jones seems to believe that all businesses are run by fat, evil, cigar-smoking capitalists brutally exploiting poor downtrodden workers in Britain’s dark satanic mills:
Darren, old chap. Those dark satanic mills don’t exist any more. They don’t exist mainly because of Britain’s political and media elites’ absurd obsession with the ludicrous Net Zero. This has given Britain the world’s highest energy prices. So energy-intensive companies have been closed and production mainly moved to China with its more than 3,000 coal-fired power stations giving Chinese companies energy that costs less than a quarter of energy in Britain.
Of course, the Chinese are astonished at our stupidity and probably can’t stop laughing at our economic suicide:
Darren, most private-sector employees in Britain work for small and medium-sized companies (SMEs). The government’s statistics show that in 2023 SMEs employed 16.7 million people in the UK, 61% of the total number of people employed by private sector companies. These businesses – shops, restaurants, pubs, small manufacturers – aren’t brutally exploiting their employees. But after being hit by the national insurance increase, a rise in business rates and LibLabCon’s eye-wateringly expensive energy costs Britain’s businesses are struggling.
Darren, I can imagine that, after Reeves presented her budget, there was a big celebration at the Treasury as you all gleefully celebrated squeezing around £40bn from the hated rich capitalists, supposedly ‘multi-millionaire’ farmers. parents daring to send their children to private schools and all the other groups Labour hates. But Darren, what will really happen after your economically-illiterate budget will be a deepening recession, tens of thousands of business closures, hundreds of thousands of workers losing their jobs, a massive increase in welfare payments and a shortcut to national bankruptcy. And, of course, as the economy shrinks into recession, you won’t get your £40bn or anywhere near it. Darren, why not try Googling “The Laffer Curve”? You might actually learn something about economics?
Darren ‘human zit’ Jones, I believe you are stupid, arrogant, incompetent, self-serving, full of class hate and, like your boss Rachel the cv liar Reeves, you are a disaster from which the British economy will never be able to recover. But hey, that’s just my opinion and I’m a nobody while you’re (unfortunately for Britain) a very important person.
It’s just one month since Donald Trump and his team took office. And it has achieved more in its first four weeks than most US presidents achieve in their four years:
He has signed over 70 executive orders
All federal DIE (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity) staff have been put on leave and will be fired
His team have deported about 5,000 illegal migrants and arrested many more
At least 10,000 unnecessary government employees have been fired
His DOGE has uncovered billions in fraud and waste at USAID and has closed down the department
His team have fired senior officials in several government departments
Trump steamrolled over Columbia’s refusal to take back Columbian criminals deported from the US by threatening trade tariffs
Trump pushed the Panama government into deciding to end an agreement giving Chinese shipping special rights to use the Panama Canal at lower rates than US shipping
Trump sent the Arabs into complete panic by suggesting clearing all the Palestinians out of the Gaza Strip and resettling them in surrounding Arab countries. The Arab leaders quickly called an emergency meeting to come up with a counter proposal
Trump sent our useless European leaders into a panic by suggesting Europe whould take responsibility for its own defence. A conference was hastily convened at which our European rulers all ended up shouting at each other and Germany’s Scholz walked out in fury
Trump is making a serious effort to end the slaughter in Ukraine while all our do-nothing, cowardly European leaders hurl abuse at him and accuse him of being the new Neville Chamberlain
Then last week, Vice President (and likely future US president) J.D. Vance had European leaders throwing their toys out of their prams when he gave a speech accusing European leaders of allowing destructive mass immigration and then using draconian restrictions on freedom of speech to prevent any European citizens criticising their leaders’ race replacement policies.
And now we have US Energy Secretary Chris Wright saying that Net Zero is “Lunacy” and a “Colossal Failure”. Wright called Net Zero 2050 a “sinister goal” that “lowers the standard of living of the population” by “impoverishing… citizens in pursuit of a delusion”. Enjoy this Daily Sceptic article:
It’s wonderful to watch an elected politician and his team actually doing what he promised to do. And it exposes our European politicians – especially spineless robot Starmer, gutless French popinjay Macron and testicle-free balding bank-clerk-lookalike Scholz – for being incompetent, lying, impotent, self-serving, hypocritical, Islamophiliac, West-hating, worthless garbage.
Rejoice, rejoice! The BBC tells us that “UK economy unexpectedly grew at the end of last year, new figures show”. Yipee, so we’re all richer!
Of course, it’s all complete nonsense – lies, obfuscation and figure-fiddling. Let’s do some simple arithmetic.
UK GDP is about £2.717 trillion
if we simplify and say that a quarter of this £2.717 trillion was generated in the last quarter of 2024, that gives us £679 billion
the economy supposedly grew by a wondrous 0.1%. This 0.1% (if I’ve got my decimals right) gives us £679 million of growth
Now let’s look at where that £679 million of growth might have come from. Here’s a chart of government borrowing from the Office for National Statistics:
In October 2024 the government borrowed about £18 billion, in November this fell to around £12 billion and then in December it shot up again to £18 billion. So, in the last quarter of 2024, the government borrowed around £48 billion and managed to create just £679 million of economic growth.
Or you could try another simple calculation. Due to Reeves’s financial incontinence in throwing money at our worthless underperforming, incompetent, wasteful public sector, borrowing for the last three months of the year 2024 was about £4 billion more than the ludicrously misnamed Office for Budget Responsibility forecast. And this £4 billion gave us the ‘fantastic’ £679 million of economic growth the Labour-loving BBC was so delighted to announce.
Of course, with our rulers’ open-borders, ‘bring-in-the-Third-world’ policies of replacing the British population, our gdp per capita – the real measure of our national wealth – is falling and will continue to fall as we get ever poorer:
And here’s today’s ‘fun fact’ – the UK’s gdp per capita is now lower than the poorest US state, Mississippi.
The only thing which can save us now is a massive financial crash, national bankruptcy, a refusal by the bond markets to lend us any more money for the government to waste and a bailout by the IMF with the condition that Britain cuts our useless public sector by at least 20% to 30%.
I know I should be writing my own stuff. But I found this shortish YouTube video from Neil Oliver so gobsmacking that I felt it worth spreading it to as wide an audience as possible.
In the video, Oliver exposes the greed, lies and hypocrisy of Democrat senator Big Pharma shills as they try to prevent RFK Jnr becoming a key person overseeing public health in the Trump administration.
I don’t need to write any more. The video says it all:
I don’t know where this came from. But, as Labour prepare a legal definition of “Islamophobia” to crush free speech, I could imagine that there might be some silly people who believe this is true:
“There is a consensus of opinion that Labour is appeasing Islam for votes. What they fail to understand is that Islam is using Labour until it is strong enough to form its own party at which point labour will be dumped and we face the prospect of Sharia law in the UK. They have already taken over the Home Office and councils.” Lord Talbot
Linked to this is an image I dare not show here. But if you Google “The Islamic Doomsday Clock” on Google images, you should find it
David Craig, on March 6th, 2025
