So, we learn that the suspect in the train stabbings was “British born”. Did I mention that he was “British born”? Anyway this “British born” suspect who was born in Britain and thus is “British born” has been arrested. And the police were uncharacteristically quick in informing us that this “British born” suspect was “born in Britain”.
But why does every news report repeat and repeat and repeat that the suspect was “British born”? A cynic might be tempted to suspect that repeatedly stressing that the “British born” suspect was born in Britain is a distraction technique to try and prevent people from concluding that the attack could have been motivated by some kind of extremist ideology or religion.
But hold on a minute. Wasn’t one of Britain’s worst terrorist attacks carried out by a cherubic, British born “Welsh choir boy”?
Though I heard one ‘reporter’ suggesting that, just like the train stabbings, the Southport murders were not motivated by any religious beliefs. Um, perhaps that reporter ‘forgot’ about the various documents which were found in the cherubic British born Welsh choirboy’s bedroom?
Anyway, some cynics probably won’t be surprised when our rulers declare that the train stabbings were due to “mental ‘elf ishoos” and absolutely nothing to do with any rather dodgy beliefs. After all, the suspect was “British born”!
Sorry, I was a bit late. The “mental ‘elf ishoos” explanation/excuse has already been pushed out in all the mainstream media. So nothing to worry about. And we’ll get the usual:
horrifying events
our thoughts and prayers blah blah
praise for the emergency services blah blah
isolated incident
nothing to see here
shut up plebs or the plods will be coming for you
Britain’s drift towards civil war?
There was a (IMHO) brilliant article on the Daily Sceptic a couple of days ago (link below). For me, the most significant lines in the article were:
According to a 2023 UnHerd–Focaldata poll, 32% of Britons agree that the ‘Great Replacement’ is real. In recent years, official reviews of the Prevent programme and the Commission for Countering Extremism have identified the idea as an “extremist” and “hateful” narrative. Rather than ask why so many believe it, the emphasis falls instead on policing the discourse. Once again, policy yields to narrative control – suppressing arguments and evidence that make the state uneasy. Effort is directed to the administrative management of disbelief: to discipline perception rather than address reality.
After all, following each “absolutely nothing to do with terrorism” attack, many more people are arrested for commenting on the attack than on actually participating in the attack.
So, after the train stabbing attack, we’re being told (warned?) that “it would be inappropriate to speculate” on the motives for the stabbing attack.
I think we all know what that means. I suspect that, had the attacker(s) been overweight, shaven-headed white men with St George’s Cross and “I luv mum” tattoos screaming something like “long live Tommy Robinson”, our rulers/oppressors would have released ensured the BBC and other mainstream media broadcast that information pretty damn quickly. But none of the mainstream media reports seem overly keen to give us any information about the attackers’ colour or ethnicity or stuff like that in spite of the fact that there were an awful lot of eye-witnesses.
How curious. Not.
However, I don’t want to be “Lucy-Connollied”. You might be tempted to speculate. But I won’t dare because I know what happens to people who tell truths which are uncomfortable to the UK-hating, self-serving, lying, globalist elites.
And anyway, once information is released, no doubt we’ll be told that the attacker(s) were suffering from “mental health” problems and that ………… sorry. I’d better stop myself here for obvious reasons as I was about to mention ………………..
As you can see, Russia is rather big. The total surface area of Russia is 17.1 million square km. The whole of Europe is just 10.53 million square km. And Britain is a tiddly 243,610 square km. Ukraine, which Russia wants to conquer, is only 603,628 square km. And Russia has sacrificed probably around one million dead and wounded to take just 20% of Ukraine – about 120,000 square km. So, one million casualties to increase Russian territory by an almost infintessimal 0.6%.
Not only is Russia huge, but it is also underpopulated. Russia’s population is around 8.4 people per square km. In the EU it is over 100 people per square km, in Britain 280 people per square km and in Ukraine – about 75 people per square km. And, of course, the population of Russia is falling. The country’s fertility rate is less than 1.5 children per woman — which is far less than the 2.1 births per woman that’s needed to simply maintain a nation’s population.
The last thing Russia needs is more land. Yet Putin launched his pointless war and is now forced to continue it to save face and save his own skin.
Surely this must be one of the most pointless wars in history?
The latest release of figures from the Office for National Statistics’ tells us that homelessness in the UK is at record levels:
“The number of households in temporary accommodation are at a record high in England, Scotland, and Wales; there were around 117,400 households in England, 16,300 households in Scotland, and 6,400 households in Wales living in temporary accommodation.”
And a few days ago, I saw a report on the BBC about Britain’s homelessness crisis.
What the BBC and our political rulers seem to forget to mention is the role of open-borders, uncontrolled, Third-world immigration in occupying homes that could have been made available for British citizens:
Given the massive increase in immigration since the 2021 census, the situation now will be even worse.
If we didn’t have all these presumably ‘highly-qualified’ doctors and engineers from abroad occupying more than a third of social housing, there might be a bit of room for British homeless people? In fact, if we didn’t have over 100,000 illegal migrants in HMOs and other accommodation plus 35,000 in hotels, we probably wouldn’t need to have any hopme;less people in Britain at all.
Vote Labour! Vote for the “Migrants R Us” party – the party which loathes Britain and the British.
As for the future, Labour will be doing everything they can to increase legal and illegal migration to bring in ever more Labour voters. And, no doubt, Labour will be dispersing these wonderful people into constituencies where just a few more Labour voters will ensure Labour keeps the seat.
AI is enabling people to make ever better parody videos:
You’ll all have seen the story about how our uselsss, useless, useless police are searching for an illegal migrant (who had being staying at the Bell Hotel in Epping at our expense) who was ‘accidentally’ released from prison where he was supposed to serve time for sexually assaulting a schoolgirl and a woman.
As I write this, I believe our useless, useless, useless plods still haven’t found the guy yet.
But here’s some video allegedly showing the ‘accidentally-released’ gentleman, still in his prison grey tracksuit chatting with some of his ‘bruvs’. It looks like he is asking directions to somewhere.
It seems that members of the public know where he is, but still our useless, useless, useless plod can’t find him!
***Exclusive***
I have been sent footage, of who is believed to be the Epping migrant, Hadush Kebatu ,videod by a member of the public in Chelmsford City centre at midday today, and emailed to me.
It might be worth mentioning that some people are suggesting that this fine individual was actually intentionally released in order to give the Starmer Stasi an excuse to accelerate the introduction of Starmer’s wonderful digital IDs.
There has been much kerfuffle about our noble government’s largely fictional ‘Child Grooming Gang’ inquiry. Some of the problems seem to revolve around the accusation that our UK-hating, migrant-adoring, Islamophiliac government is trying to “broaden” the inquiry.
But why would the government be trying to “broaden” the inquiry? And could this “broadening” actually be part of the (IMHO) hapless, charmless and slitheringly untrustworthy Jess ‘Baldrick’ Phillips’s cunning plan?
Here’s a suggestion as to how Baldrick’s cunning plan to “broaden” the inquiry might work:
it has been well-established that the worst sexual abuse of underage white girls has been carried out mainly by Pakistani Religion of Peace and Tolerance men
Labour is desperate to avoid any inquiry reaching this conclusion as Labour politicians, social workers and police bosses have spent decades covering this up as Labour is terrified of losing the sectarian Religion of Peace and Tolerance vote to new Religion of Peace and Tolerance candidates
So, what can Baldrick Phillips do? Most child sexual abuse occurs within families. Perhaps surprisingly the United Kingdom’s population is still predominantly White British (75.98% at the 2021 Census). Though, of course, the LibLabCon Party is doing everything it can to make White British a minority in their own country by around 2060. The second and third largest non-white racial groups are Asian British at 8.6% of the population, followed by Black British people at 3.71%.
Thus if Jess ‘Baldrick’ Phillips can “broaden” the inquiry away from the rampaging Religion of Peace and Tolerance rape gangs to include all child sexual abuse, suddenly we will find that the majority of child sexual abuse is carried out by White British men and not by our friends and neighbours from our favourite religion.
Hey presto! It’s magic! Brilliant! Well done Baldrick Phillips! By “broadening” the inquiry you’ve just managed to “prove” that White men carry out most of the child sexual abuse in our once great, but now Third-world, country and that our friends from our favourite religion are blameless compared to those nasty abusive White men. And that means our friends from our absolute favouritest religion can keep on importing their charming and colourful cultural practices into our country to enrich our young British girls and, more importantly for Jess ‘Baldrick’ Phillips and her chums, will keep on voting Labour.
First I must apologise. I think I made a mistake in yesterday’s blog about the latest Dublin riots. I thought I had read that the girl allegedly sexually molested by a recently-arrived multi-cultural enricher was 12 years old. Latest reports suggest that she was only 10 years old. As for the multi-cultural enricher, I believe that he required an Arabic interpreter when he appeared in court. I’ll leave it up to you to guess his ethnicity and religion. Moreover, I forgot to mention that the migrant, 26, whose arrest over sexual assault of 10-year-old Irish girl sparked riots in Dublin had been on deportation list for months but was still hanging around, at Irish taxpayers’ expense, trying to multi-culturally enrich Ireland’s young female population.
Diversity is our strength!
‘Our’ NHS is beyond saving
While the (IMHO) greasy, slithering, oleaginous Health Secretary – Streeting – bleats about transforming our worthless NHS and cutting waiting lists, the NHS is still busy wasting hundreds of millions on utterly pointless DIE (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity) waste-of-skins.
The once respected London Moorfields Eye Hospital has just put up a job ad for a ‘Head of EDI and Culture‘. This piece of pointless cr*p will be paid £72,921 – £83,362 a year.
“Reporting to the Associate Director of Employee Experience, the Head of EDI and Culture will play a pivotal role in shaping the organisations culture to be more diverse, equitable and inclusive. The role includes fostering an inclusive workplace, driving cultural and organisational change, ensuring compliance with local and national policies and legislation, and fostering a workplace culture where everyone feels respected, valued, supported, and empowered to thrive.”
“Are you passionate about creating inclusive, equitable, and high-performing workplace cultures? Do you have the vision and leadership to drive transformational change across a leading NHS Trust? If so, we want to hear from you.”
“As Head of Equality, Diversity, Inclusion (EDI) and Culture, you will lead the strategic development and delivery of our EDI and cultural transformation agenda. You’ll be instrumental in embedding compassionate leadership, psychological safety, and inclusive practices across the organisation. This is a high-impact role where you’ll shape policy, drive engagement, and ensure compliance with national standards including WRES, WDES, and Gender Pay Gap reporting.”
While Moorfields Eye Hospital feels it necessary to spaff so much of our money on this rubbish, I note that the hospital’s workforce is 58.8% BME and more than double the national average of 28.6%. Moreover, approximately only 18% of the UK population is from a Black, Asian, Mixed, or Other ethnic group, based on the most recent data from the 2021 Census for England and Wales. So the workforce at Moorfields is already more than 3 times as diverse as the UK population.
Hey Streeting! How about spending less time (IMHO) playing around with your male friends (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) and instead stop this nonsense!!!!!
We now know that Birmingham (twinned with Karachi, Mogadishu and Gaza) is becoming a no-go area for certain people. And the police, from the little I understand, have to consult with what are called ‘community leaders’ on the very rare occasions they want to venture out of their comfortable police stations and actually do some policing.
And now we see anti-immigration riots in Dublin yesterday after a 12-year-old girl was reportedly sexually assaulted by one of Ireland’s new ‘guests’. It could seem as if some Irish don’t want their country going the same way as UK cities and towns like Birmingham, Rotherham, Rochdale, Oldham, Leicester, Oxford etc etc etc etc:
But will the Irish manage to prevent their rulers turning their country into a crime-ridden, misogynistic, sectarian Third-world hell-hole?
I doubt it because I’ve read something called the “Project Ireland 2040” issued in 2018:
The Irish government website tells us: “Project Ireland 2040 is the government’s long-term overarching strategy to make Ireland a better country for all of its people”.
Here are just a few key points from Project Ireland 2040:
Guide the future development of Ireland, taking into account a projected 1 million increase in our population, the need to create 660,000 additional jobs to achieve full employment and a need for 550,000 more homes by 2040;
Of the 1 million extra people,
25% is planned for Dublin, recognised as our key international and global city of scale and principal economic driver,
25% across the other four cities combined (Cork, Limerick, Galway and Waterford), enabling all four to grow their population and jobs by 50-60%, and become cities of greater scale, i.e. growing by twice as much as they did over the previous 25 years to 2016, and
with the remaining 50% of growth to occur in key regional centres, towns, villages and rural areas, to be determined in the forthcoming regional plans – Regional Spatial and Economic Strategies (RSESs)
Some interesting issues arise with this plan. Firstly, most governments can barely plan beyond next week, so how can the Irish government plan for more than 20 years ahead? Secondly, there are general elections in Ireland every 5 years and presidential elections every 7 years. So what would be the point of one government or one president producing a 20-year plan? This would only make sense if the main political parties and the presidential candidates were almost indistinguishable from each other and if they were all pursuing almost exactly the same polices dictated to them by the Bilderberg Brussels bureacrats and Davos WEF billionaires. This would make Irish elections meaningless as whichever party or presidential candidate won would follow the same policies
The 2040 ‘population increase’
But the main problem with Plan 2040 is the expected increase in population of about one million people. The Irish birth rate is around 1.9 children per woman down from 4 children per woman in the 1960s and 1970s. The UK is at 1.8. But replacement level is 2.1 children per woman. So, the indigenous Irish population is actually declining.
Ooops! Where are the extra one million people going to come from? Hmmm, I wonder. OK, I remember now – the extra more than one million people will come from Africa, the Middle East and lovely places like Crapistan. That’s 50,000 a year for 20 years – about 1,000 a week.
Of course, the supporters of the ‘everybody welcome’ brigade will claim that all of these wonderful people being imported by Ireland’s rulers are highly educated, very Westernised and eager to roll up their sleeves and get to work paying taxes to support Ireland’s ageing population. On the other hand, some cynics may suspect that most migrants will be poorly educated, barely literate, low-IQ, violent, lazy, unemployable, West-hating, benefits-scrounging, deeply criminal human flotsam and debris who will impose a massive economic burden on the working Irish, destroy communities and strain public services like health, education and policing as has happened in so many other Western European countries.
Will the Irish let their country be destroyed?
The Irish population is around 4.8 million. Let’s assume that the indigenous population will decline to about 4 million by 2040 because of the falling birth rate and a long history of native Irish emigrating to the UK and other English-speaking countries in search of new opportunities. Then, of the 5.8 million people who (the Irish government predicts) will be living in Ireland by 2040, around 1.8 million – almost one in three ‘Irish’ – will be from Africa, the Middle East or places like Crapistan.
Let me just repeat that – one in three Irish will be from Africa, the Middle East or Crapistan! Moreover, this isn’t the ranting of some anti-migration nutjob. This is all clearly laid out in the Project Ireland 2040 report.
Am I really the only person who has realised what the Irish government’s plan will do to their country?
Ludicrously, the Project Ireland 2040 plan has nice pictures of rolling Irish countryside and happy white Irish families.