Snouts in the Trough

(I’d like to leave this up for one more day. By the way The Lancaster Plan was drawn up under the Blair Labour government back in 2005, after the bombings in London, when it had been known as The Lancaster Plan, named, he explained, after John of Gaunt who, although never king himself, sired the line of English Kings that came after him, kings who kept England together and at the forefront of world developments)

There’s a piece doing the rounds on the Internet. It’s called “The Lancaster Plan”. It’s almost certainly a spoof. But like all good spoofs, it’s so close to reality that you could get an uncomfortable feeling about it. Today, I’ll try and sum up “The Lancaster Plan”:

Our rulers know that M*sl*ms will eventually become a majority in Britain and take over our country. After all, the British M*sl*m population doubles about every 12 years. At the 2001 census, there were 1,550,000 M*sl*ms in Britain. By 2011 this had reached 2,710,000. Now it’s probably around 3,500,000. By 2027 it could be 7 million. By 2039 possibly 14 million and by 2051 28 million.

Meanwhile the indigenous British population is declining. The replacement birth rate is 2.1 children per female. For indigenous Brits the birth rate has fallen to 1.6 children per female while for British Pakistanis it is 4.7 children per female.

Of course, as British M*sl*ms become more affluent, they may reach what’s called a “transition point” where birth rates start falling. Or they may not. However, with the influx of several million M*sl*ms into Europe each year – many of whom will head to Benefits Britain once they get their EU travel documents, the rate of M*sl*m population growth here may actually accelerate.

When the London bombings happened, our rulers realised that if Britain’s M*sl*m population felt their takeover of our country was being blocked, they would resort to violence and this would eventually lead to civil war between M*sl*ms and indigenous Brits. So, they came up with “The Lancaster Plan”. The basis for The Lancaster Plan is that if Britain’s M*sl*ms saw that they could take over our country peacefully, then they would not resort to violence and civil war could be avoided.

The Lancaster Plan has several phases. The first phase has already been successfully implemented. This has been to convince the sheeple that any criticism of *sl*m is racist and to make criticism of *sl*m – *sl*mophobia – a criminal offence. Nobody in public life now would dare make any criticism of *sl*m or M*sl*ms for fear of losing their job and even being prosecuted or killed. And most people would probably not even dare tell close friends about what they thought of *sl*m and M*sl*ms.

Phase 2 is also being successfully practised. This phase allows M*sl*ms in Britain to have special treatment and even be above the law – gang-rape white girls, shoplift, preach violence and hatred etc – without any action being taken against them by the authorities or the police who have been instructed to relentlessly harass and prosecute anyone criticising M*sl*ms, but to ignore crimes committed by M*sl*ms for fear of ‘harming inter-community relations’.

Phase 3 involves gradually handing control of our country over to M*sl*ms. On 5  May, it looks like London will get a M*sl*m mayor. Moreover, the Government is pushing through legislation to supposedly ‘devolve power’ by establishing mayors in all our major cities. Although M*sl*ms only account for about 5% of the UK population now, probably almost 15% of London’s population is M*sl*m. In places like Manchester and Birmingham M*sl*ms make up about 25% of the population. In some towns – Derby, Burnley – the M*sl*m population may be between 40% and 50%. This means that most of our major cities will be majority M*sl*m within 10 to 20 years. So, the Government’s ‘devolution’ essentially means ceding our cities and towns to M*sl*m control.

In Phase 4, once M*sl*ms gain control of large parts of our country, they will be allowed to impose their customs – Sharia Law (there are already over 80 ‘Sharia Councils’, basically Sharia Courts,  operating in Britain – most are attached to mosques), banning of alcohol, converting abandoned pubs and churches into mosques, massive electoral voting fraud, widespread corruption etc – in the areas where they have power.

Then one day, probably around 2060 to 2070, the sheeple will wake up to find that their country has been *sl*mified and that they are living under M*sl*m rule. And all this will have happened without the country having had a civil war.

Of course, The Lancaster Plan is a spoof. It could never happen, could it?

Brilliant move by Donald Trump. Claiming to be upset by a press release put out by Fox News, he has refused to participate in Fox News’s Republican presidential candidates debate.

The real reason he won’t take part is probably that, as the clear frontrunner, he has everything to lose by the others ganging up on him and nothing to gain.

By telling Fox News to stick their lousy debate where the sun doesn’t shine, Trump is breaking all the rules of the campaigning game and leaving the other contenders looking like pathetic political pygmies all flailing around in his shadow.

Trump just gave a press conference mocking Fox News and claiming the network’s top executives had been desperately calling him every 15 minutes begging him to take part, and that he had spoken to Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of Fox’s parent company, News Corp., just minutes before.

Of course, all the media will claim that Trump’s refusal to participate just shows how cowardly or mad he is. I think it shows strategic genius and will probably win him even more support from ‘ordinary’ people disgusted by the way the political elites have betrayed them.

And talking of madness. We’re constantly being told Trump is ‘mad’. Well here’s a short (1 minute) YouTube video where he says that Merkel’s (and thus Europe’s and Britain’s) immigration policies are “insane”:

I’m struggling to find any reason to disagree with what Trump is saying about our immigration insanity.

So, who is really mad? Trump as our media constantly tell us? Or Merkel, Cameron and all the other *sl*mophiliac appeasement junkies in politics and media who think that if we crawl grovelling to M*sl*ms they’ll leave us in peace?

Unless Trump becomes US president, Western civilisation is at risk of being obliterated by the *sl*mic invasion.

But we all know that the US political establishment will find some way of blocking Trump, just as the French establishment managed to block Marine Le Pen’s Front National.

Even today, if you said to anyone in the UK that within 30 or so years our country will be run by M*sl*ms, they’d still think you were mad or racist or both.

But let’s look at London for a few hundred words. The election for the next London mayor is on 5 May 2016. The current favourite to replace Boris Johnson is Sadiq Khan, a Labour politician and son of immigrants from that excrement-covered hell-hole of backwardness, stupidity, religious intolerance, persecution of Christians, gang rape, stoning, FGM and corruption – Pakistan.

While a Labour MP, Mr Khan had some unfortunate ‘misunderstandings’ over his expenses and more than once reportedly had to repay money that was overclaimed due to ‘administrative oversights’ and of course not due to greed and corruption. Mr Khan is surely an honest man? Perhaps he just didn’t understand the rules?

But what did honest Mr Khan do before he got his snout deep into the trough of the hundreds of millions we taxpayers pour into Westminster each year?

Oh look, he was a Yuman Rights lawyer. But not just any Yuman Rights lawyer. Mr Khan seems to specialise in cases defending people who have caused trouble for the UK authorities or who claim to have been racially discriminated against:

• Bubbins vs The United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights – shooting of an unarmed individual by police marksmen)
• HSU and Thompson v Met Police (wrongful arrest/police damages)
• Reeves v Met Police (duty of care to prisoners)
• Murray v CAB (discrimination)
• Ahmed v University of Oxford (racial discrimination against a student)
• Dr Jadhav v Secretary of State for Health (racial discrimination in the employment of Indian doctors by the health service)
• CI Logan v Met Police (racial discrimination)
• Supt Dizaei v Met Police (police damages, discrimination)
• Farakhan v Home Secretary (Human Rights Act)

The Supt Dizaei case is an interesting one as our honest, fearless, freedom-fighter Mr Khan was trying to prevent (fortunately for us unsuccessfully) the M*sl*m police commander, Dizaei, from going to prison for alleged “misconduct in public office” and “attempting to pervert the course of justice”.

As for the Farakhan vs Home Secretary case – Farakhan had been banned from Britain for expressing “anti-Semitic and racially divisive views”.  Our Mr Khan helped Farakhan get that ban lifted. Perhaps you’re beginning to get an idea of where Sadiq Khan’s loyalties lie?

Of course, this is not a full list of honest Mr Khan’s cases. But I couldn’t see any examples of him defending the Yuman Rights of under-age British girls gang-raped and gang-sodomised and gang-tortured by mainly Pakistani M*sl*m men. Perhaps, for Mr Khan, some people (people who hate Britain or who are M*sl*ms) have more Yuman Rights than others?

And what about honest Sadiq’s political achievements? Khan was an early backer of the totally unelectable twat Ed Miliband becoming his campaign manager. Khan reportedly masterminded the useless Ed Miliband’s shock win over his frighteningly photogenic and electable elder brother David, and was tipped as a future rising star of the Labour Party, jumping 82 places in one year to 16th in The Daily Telegraph’s ‘top 100 most influential left wingers’. So, to further his own political career, Slimey Sadiq helped condemn his party to 10 to 15 years out of power. But what does he care? He’ll soon be the extremely well-paid, well-pensioned and generously expensed London mayor.

What can we expect if Mr Khan wins?

Well, if it’s anything like Tower Hamlets or Birmingham or Rotherham or any of the other towns where M*sl*ms have taken control in Britain, we should get massive electoral fraud, intimidation forcing people to vote for the M*sl*m candidate, taxpayer-funded jobs for the politician’s family and cronies, huge sums of our money siphoned off and given to M*sl*m organisations, lucrative public-sector contracts awarded to firms run by M*sl*ms as part of a policy of ‘positive discrimination’, clear warnings given to the police and the authorities to avoid ‘offending’ M*sl*ms by investigating crimes (rape, robbery, violence, benefits fraud etc) committed by M*sl*ms and similarly clear orders to clamp down brutally on any signs of suspected *sl*mophobia by the few white people remaining in Londonistan, plus of course a huge increase in the number of mosques mostly funded by lunatic billionaire fanatics from Saudi Arabia.

You still think M*sl*ms won’t soon be running Britain? Hopefully you’ll change your mind after 5 May.

Oh and Londoners, if this (IMHO) piece of utter sh*t gets elected mayor, please don’t bitch and moan when he turns our once great city of London into a corrupt, stinking Third-World bastard cross of Raqqa, Karachi and Teheran. Remember, you voted for this (IMHO) total worthless shite. You get what you vote for.

Relax

Oh, and to cheer us all up, here’s something sent to me by a reader. But don’t laugh otherwise you might get arrested by the thought police for *sl*mophobia:

Recently while in the Land of Smells, I was sitting in a cheap and cheerful restaurant where I often eat dinner, in general watching the world go by and in particular observing ladies of the night and their customers negotiating what services would be provided and at what cost:

My attention was caught by a group of four Indian men in a long and animated discussion with quite a large lady. I could see from her body language that she was suggesting the four Indian men take her along with some other girls and from the Indians’ body language that definitely they wanted a ‘four-on-one’ and weren’t interested in more possibly normal one-on-one sexual intercourse. Eventually, the negotiation ended and the four Indian men walked away presumably to try to convince another lady to deliver their desires at the appropriate cost.

Interested in what it was all about, after I paid my dinner bill, I crossed over the road and offered the lady in question 100 baht if she would tell me what the Indians were looking for. It seems that their intention was that three of them would be having sex with her simultaneously – one with his penis in her mouth, another in her vagina and a third in her anus – while the fourth filmed events and took photos. (That would give the Indians some lovely memories to share with family and friends. OK, perhaps not with family. And certainly not with their wives. But definitely with their friends) Then after a while, the lady didn’t explain how long, the four Indians would change positions – the one in her mouth might move to her vagina, the one in her vagina to her mouth or her anus or to the role of film-maker and photographer recording events and so on.

This is something very noticeable in the Land of Smells. Farangs (Westerners) and Japanese tend to take one girl each for their boom boom. But with Indians, it’s always three, four or five men to one girl/woman.

Moreover, whereas Farangs and Japanese tend to go for the younger, slimmer girls, the Indians prefer someone with quite a few extra kilos (someone like their mothers?!?!?!). But I guess that, when you’re four or five men all enthusiastically banging away at one female, you need something reasonably well-built that can easily take the strain.

I have no great cultural or psychological insights to offer as to why so many Indian men are so obsessed with group (several men on one female) sex and why they seem to be afraid of straightforward, old-fashioned one-on-one sex. But it definitely seems to be a widespread national characteristic.

Hey ho, it’s a funny old world.

We now know that due to political correctness, for many years M*sl*ms in Britain have been allowed (and are still allowed) to gang-rape, gang-sodomise and gang-torture as many white girls as they want. The police, the politicians and the authorities all knew (and still know) exactly what was going on (and is still going on), but did nothing (and do nothing) as they didn’t want to (and still don’t want to) offend M*sl*ms and they don’t want the British losing faith in our rulers’ wet dream of a multi-cultural society.

But the Swedes have taken political correctness (actually cowardice, *sl*mophilia and cultural suicide) to a whole new level. Now M*sl*ms in Sweden are allowed to murder white Europeans without any action being taken against them.

The story concerns a M*sl*m boy who stabbed a classmate to death. The M*sl*m’s father claims his dear, peace-loving, non-violent son was being bullied and just retaliated against the bully. The European father of the dead boy claims his son was killed for intervening when the M*sl*m boy sexually harrassed a girl. Who do you believe?

Anyway, here’s the story:

The parents of 15 year old Lithuanian boy Arminas Pileckas have blasted Sweden and the Swedish media for cowardice in the face of the migrant threat, and for covering up the murder of their son.

Arminas Pileckas, a native of northern European state Lithuania was living in Sweden with his parents when he was brutally murdered on Monday by an “Arab” — reportedly Syrian — migrant classmate.

It is reported that Arminas intervened to protect a female school-mate from being sexually assaulted in December, only to have the Syrian he defended her from stab him in the back and through the heart on the first day of the next term.

While the killing of a European on his first day back at school by a migrant pupil has received minimal press coverage in Sweden, it has been practically ignored across the rest of Europe, a state of affairs his father has called a ‘cover-up’.

In an angry interview with his native Lithuanian press, Arminas’ father said he hadn’t even been approached for interviews by the Swedish press after the death of his son, while the same Swedish media rushed to interview the father of the killer. He said in Lithuania the migrant problem was frankly and openly discussed, while in Sweden “everything is being kept hidden”.

This week the mainstream left-wing paper Aftonbladet published a sympathetic interview with the father of the 14-year-old migrant killer who accused the dead boy of bullying his migrant classmate. In a remarkable admission of the alien culture the accused came from, the father of the “Arab student” told the paper the school had done nothing in the wake of the altercation in December: “The school did nothing to help him and establish his honour. Instead, my son had to meet this 15 -year-old every day. It made him very upset”.

Aftonbladet did not question whether hurt honour was a sufficient reason for killing a classmate, nor did it report on the teenage girl Arminas is said to have lost his life over or the Syrian origin of the suspected killer.

Arminas’ father has said the reports in the Swedish press about his son being a bully are bare-faced lies. He told the Lyrtas: “He was hard-working, cheerful and had a lot of Swedish friends. All loved him… The Swedish press writes that Arminas assaulted the student, but that is not the case…. our son saw that boy take the girl. He stopped him and they got into a fight”.

Mr. Pileckas said the young boy swore to get his revenge on Arminas for keeping him away from his female class mates, that the school knew about it and that it was not an isolated incident in Broby, Skåne where they lived. He said of the ‘refugees’ living in the town: “A Lithuanian girl was attacked a few months ago. They tried to rape her. The police did nothing then… last year the refugees attacked another Lithuanian, who was taking her puppy for a walk”.

Rejecting any notion of his son being a bully, he said the school would certainly have told him were that the case: “the school never hides anything. If he was just late to class, we parents would instantly receive messages”.