As our gutless Prime Minister and worthless, lying Chancellor do their best to sell our country out to German control, in America Donald Trump is smashing down his opponents to be president by standing up for America.
I don’t know what Trump’s policies are (if he has any). But I have grasped a few of his key opinions:
The sell-out – America has been betrayed by a political establishment that is only interested in enriching itself and is in the pockets of the banks (particularly Goldman Sachs) and the big corporations
The pointless wars – America’s wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were led by incompetents and fools who had no idea what they were doing
The Iraq lies – The Bush administration lied to the American people about Saddam’s supposed WMDs to justify their invasion
Destruction of jobs – Hopelessly negotiated trade deals (especially with China, Japan and Mexico) have wrecked American industry, destroyed millions of American jobs and pushed down the wages of those still in work
Stop M*sl*m immigration – M*sl*m immigration has been almost as disastrous for the US as it has for Europe and new plots by American M*sl*ms to kill Americans are being discovered every week
If I was an American, I’d be agreeing with everything Trump is saying.
Trump may be rich. Trump may have inherited a lot of his money. And like any dealmaker, some of his deals have been successful and some have been failures. But at least he’s not a corrupt, parasitical, self-serving, Washington insider. He represents the interests of the American people, not the elites. No wonder the Washington elites are so scared of him.
Here’s a short (4 minutes) quite eloquent video of New Jersey Governor, Chris Christie, at a Trump rally in Texas a couple of days ago explaining why he supports Trump for president:
Today an everyday story of bribery and corruption from the Land of Smells.
In the Land of Smells, the usual way property developers go about their business is as follows:
Step 1 – Buy some land – often this involves forcing families who have lived there for generations (but may not have the required paperwork proving ownership of the land) out of their homes and quickly bulldozing those homes
Step 2 – Submit planning application – put in a planning application for a hotel, office building or condo complex featuring a small building that the developer knows will be approved
Step 3 – Build a monster – put up a building that is much larger and much higher than the one featured in the original planning application
Step 4 – Bribe local officials – when the building (which is much larger than the one in the original planning application) is completed, give a huge bribe to local officials so that they grant the necessary approval for the building to be brought into use.
That’s the way things have always been done. And it seemed to work pretty well – for developers and easily bribable officials. Not so good though for people who lost their homes or who found themselves living next to some monstrosity.
But there was a military takeover a couple of years ago and that changed things. Government officials are now a little bit more careful about being seen to enrich themselves with blatant bribes. And approving say a 40-storey block of condos or hotel of office building when only a 30-storey building was included in the planning application might, in the current climate, cause a few questions to be asked.
You could see the result of this new attitude of caution towards blatant corruption just near where I was staying
Case 1 – The hotel – Across the road was a new 13-storey hotel. It looks odd, because the first 9 storeys are built in one design and then it seems as if, as an afterthought, another 4 storeys have been plonked on top. The developer had approval for just a 7-storey building, but probably expected a healthy bribe would ensure the final 13-storey building would be approved. Moreover, the building is much larger and closer to the road than the original plan. But then came the military coup and the customary bribes seem to have been refused. The result – the developer has been told to either demolish the whole building or else move one wall of the building five metres further away from the road and to knock off the top 6 storeys. Moreover, just to make sure he complies, an army demolition squad has smashed huge holes in four floors of the wall facing the road to make sure the building is unusable:
The developer reportedly has another 10 buildings (mostly hotels) in the area and all are also reportedly in flagrant breach of planning rules. Rumours are that some of them may also have to come down. Ooops!
Case 2 – The condos – This is a huge 53-storey condo development down by the main pier. It’s reportedly a fair bit higher and closer to the sea than the building proposed in the original planning application and than the planning regulations allow – any building that tall has to be more than 100 metres from the sea:
Again, because of the new more cautious attitude to flagrant corruption, the usual bribes don’t appear to have done the trick and building work has been stopped for over a year while the developers and the (more cautious) local officials try to find a solution to this rather large problem that doesn’t look too much like blatant corruption.
The result – in both cases, there appears to be a stalemate between the developers and the authorities. I suspect that the developers’ and the planning officials’ cunning plan is to hang on till the military government passes control of the Land of Smells back to an elected civilian government. The developers and planning officials probably hope that, with the return of utterly corrupt politicians to power, it will be back to business (sorry, I meant ‘bribery’) as usual.
(Weekend blog) Lets take a look at some of the big companies who claim that leaving the EU would put British jobs at risk:
Shell, they moved most their staff to Holland and are about to decimate BG (British Gas) in Reading with the loss of thousands of UK jobs as Shell tries to cut administration costs after taking over BG. Then there’s Ford: Ford don’t make cars here anymore as it was more attractive to move production to Germany and Eastern Europe – thousands more British jobs lost. Moreover, Big Pharma companies like GSK and Astra Zeneca have moved most of their research out of the UK to places like Sweden and Pfizer closed down their huge UK research operation at Sandwich (the one that thankfully discovered Viagra) with the loss of 2,400 highly-skilled, well-paid British jobs and is now in the process of closing its Cambridge research operation – more lost British jobs.
And let’s look at a couple of Britain’s heavy industries: our last aluminium plant closed a few years ago because of Britain’s high energy costs and because the EU did nothing to stop China and Russia dumping aluminium in European markets at below the cost of production. Then there’s our steel industry – almost completely destroyed with the loss of thousands of British jobs and communities wrecked because the EU didn’t take action against China dumping their excess steel in European markets at below production cost.
Then we have the HP Sauce workers in Birmingham whose jobs went to Belgium or Holland. A product made in Britain for over 100 years saved by being in the EU?
Rowntrees of York, another British institution, sold to the Americans and with much of its production moved (I think) to Belgium or Poland. Engineering jobs in the Midlands and elsewhere gone to India, China and Vietnam.
All our power companies in the hands of the French, Germans and Spanish. The irony here is that the steel industry is bemoaning the cost of fuel when the foreign owners of our power companies have the power to raise prices for our industry and make excessive profits out of British pensioners so they can give their own pensioners and industry cheap electricity and gas thus making their products cheaper at our expense. All done by being in the EU.
The farce of the EU is that its primary beneficiaries are the political and corporate elites, yet the average worker is hammered here by cheap foreign labour. Meanwhile the majority of people running small and medium-sized businesses, who are the ‘backbone’ of the country, are also screwed.
We have our citizens made redundant who have mortgages and other financial commitments acquired when in work now having to compete against Eastern Europeans who have no similar financial commitments. They are content to live six in one room of a slum bedsit and work for the minimum wage or less. Well done EU
Big companies love the EU. If Europe was still 28 separate countries, that would make influencing government policy complicated for large companies. But by having the EU, large companies can use the 25,000 highly-paid lobbyists they have in Brussels to bribe EU politicians and eurocrats to ensure that EU regulations suit them and make operating a business much more costly for their smaller competitors. If we assume it costs about £250,000 a year to keep a lobbyist in Brussels, then our major companies may be paying about £6.2 billion a year influencing EU policy in their favour.
Our major companies claim Brexit will harm British jobs. This is a lie!
But here’s some advice for the Remain campaign from that great PR-man Joseph Goebbels “the most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly…..it must confine itself to few points and repeat them over and over”
Perhaps PR-man Goebbels is PR-man David Cameron’s hero as Dave seems to be following Goebbels’ advice with his ‘Project Fear’.
And here’s some more advice for the Remain campaign by someone else who wanted a united Europe (under German rule as usual, of course) Adolf Hitler “make a lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe you”.
The truth is that Britain leaving the EU will actually lead to a renaissance of British entrepreneurship, business and trade and the creation of thousands of new jobs.
There are just a few British jobs that will be lost if we leave the EU – there will be a lot of UK civil servants and MEPs who will no longer required.
And hopefully Angela Merkel’s glove puppet, PR-man Dave Cameron, will also be out of work along with his Europhiliac chum George Osborne.
(Apologies to those of you who read this yesterday. But I’d like to leave this post up for just one more day. The reason is I think it’s worrying that, as far as I know, not a single mainstream journalist has bothered to get hold of the 2003 letter from Britain’s business leaders warning of the ‘terrible’ consequences of not joining the Euro and not a single mainstream journalist has pointed out that we’re getting almost exactly the same warnings in almost exactly the same language from almost exactly the same companies about the ‘terrible’ consequences of leaving the corrupt, undemocratic, increasingly *sl*mified EU. I will do Part 2 of this post tomorrow, Saturday 27 February)
We all now know that, as Cameron didn’t get any concessions from his EU bosses that he can try to sell to us, he’s forced to move to Plan B to keep us in his beloved EU. Plan B is, of course, Project Fear – try to frighten people into voting to stay by claiming two things:
Brexit will lead to thousands of British job losses
Brexit will harm Britain’s security
To help with the first part of Project Fear – the supposed job losses – Cameron has got a bunch of his business cronies to sign a letter in the Times this week warning of the dangers of Brexit. Here are a couple of points about this week’s letter all these great business leaders have signed:
the letter was drafted by a civil servant and signed by the business bosses long before we knew how little Cameron would achieve in his negotiation charade
only 36 of the FTSE 100 companies have signed, which suggests that 64% don’t believe Brexit represents any threat to jobs.
But before I try to show (tomorrow) that the supposed threat to jobs is the usual Cameron bunch of lies, I’d just like to remind readers what Britain’s great business leaders wrote in 2003 when they insisted we should join the Euro and compare that to what they wrote a couple of days ago. Here’s their letter from 2003 about the ‘need’ to abandon the pound and join the Euro:
Dear Mr Blair
We are writing to make clear our concerns about the implications for business if the Government rules out membership of the euro for the lifetime of this parliament. Such a decision would be damaging for British-based businesses, British employees and the British economy as a whole.
Since the Chancellor’s statement on the euro in October 1997, the working assumption of business has been that Britain is a ‘pre-entry’ country. If it becomes apparent that this is no longer the case, the Government must be aware that this will constitute a significant change in the business climate of this country. Although in many respects, Britain is a good place to do business; non-membership of the euro is damaging that position.
Inward investment in Britain has already fallen substantially. According to the United Nations, Britain attracted 29% of foreign direct investment in the EU over the 20 years to 1999. But since the launch of the euro in that year, the share has fallen to 16%. The UN estimates that it collapsed to 5% in 2002.
By removing the barriers of separate currencies, the creation of the euro has led to a rapid increase in cross-border trade in the euro-zone. Germany’s trade with the EU has leapt from 27% of national output in 1998 to 32% in 2001. France’s trade with the EU has risen from 28% of GDP to 31%. Overall, the average rise in euro-zone countries is 3 percentage points. Meanwhile, Britain’s trade with Europe has stagnated.
The weight of independent economic evidence suggests that the conditions for entry are right. Commercial reality strongly dictates that the risks of staying outside the euro far outweigh any risks of joining. The European single market has moved on and we are no longer full members. We hope that the Government will have the courage of its convictions and recognise that membership of the euro is in our long-term national interest. To do otherwise would have serious consequences for Britain’s future prosperity.
Lord Marshall of Knightsbridge, Chair, Britain in Europe.
Nicholas Brookes*, Chief Executive, Spirent.
Martin Broughton, Chairman, British American Tobacco.
Dinesh Dhamija, Chairman, ebookers.
Vernon Ellis*, International Chair, Accenture.
Sir Richard Evans, Chairman, BAE Systems.
Niall FitzGerald, Chairman, Unilever.
Sir Chris Gent*, Chief Executive, Vodafone Group.
Robert Guy, Adviser to the Board, N.M. Rothschild & Sons; Chair, The City in Europe.
Lord Hollick, CEO, United Business Media.
Johannes Huth, Managing Director, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts.
Sir Michael Jenkins*, President, Boeing UK.
David Jordan, Chairman & Managing Director, Philips Electronics UK.
The Rt. Hon Sir Richard Needham, Deputy Chair, Dyson; Vice Chair, NEC (Europe).
Anthony Nelson*, Vice Chairman, Citigroup; Chair, Gateway to London.
Sir Bryan Nicholson, former President, CBI 1994-96.
Sir Gulam Noon, Chairman & Managing Director, Noon Products.
John Porter, Chairman, Telos Group.
Mike Rake*, International Chairman, KPMG.
Sir Nick Scheele, President and Chief Operating Officer, Ford Motor Company.
Lord Simon of Highbury, former Chairman, BP; Vice-Chair, Britain in Europe.
Sir Martin Sorrell, Chief Executive, WPP Group.
Peter Sutherland*, former Director General, World Trade Organisation.
John Travers*, Senior Partner, Cushman & Wakefield Healey & Baker.
Robert van der Merwe, Group President, Kimberly-Clark (Europe).
Alan Wood, Chief Executive, Siemens.
*signing in a personal capacity
And here’s the letter from the Times this week about the need to stay in the EU
Sir, The businesses we lead represent every sector and region of the UK. Together we employ hundreds of thousands of people across the country. Following the prime minister’s renegotiation, we believe that Britain is better off staying in a reformed European Union. He has secured a commitment from the EU to reduce the burden of regulation, deepen the single market and to sign off crucial international trade deals.
Business needs unrestricted access to the European market of 500 million people in order to continue to grow, invest and create jobs. We believe that leaving the EU would deter investment, threaten jobs and put the economy at risk. Britain will be stronger, safer and better off remaining a member of the EU.
Just look at the last line of the first paragraph of the 2003 letter – “Such a decision would be damaging for British-based businesses, British employees and the British economy as a whole” Now a line from this week’s letter – “We believe that leaving the EU would deter investment, threaten jobs and put the economy at risk”.
Yup, 13 years ago they told us not joining the Euro would damage British business and British jobs and this week in the Times they’re claiming exactly the same thing in almost exactly the same language.
Also look at another line from this week’s letter – “Following the prime minister’s renegotiation, we believe that Britain is better off staying in a reformed European Union”. But hold on, Cameron’s negotiations achieved nothing and the EU has not been reformed at all.
I find it ‘strange’ that no mainstream journalist has picked up on these points. I find it also strange that none of the signatories of the 2003 letter have apologised to us and admitted they were wrong.
I’ve invented a new drinking game. It’s called “If David Cameron had any honour, he would…..”
It sort of goes like this: a few people gather round a table well-stocked with all their favourite alcoholic drinks.
Then the first person tries to complete the sentence “If David Cameron had any honour, he would…..”
Anyone who agrees with the way the person completes the sentence gets a drink. Anyone who thinks David Cameron is an honourable man, doesn’t get a drink.
What’s the point? I’m not sure. I think it’s that anyone who trusts anything David Cameron says is an idiot and doesn’t deserve a drink. While anyone who realises what a treacherous, slimy, slippery, low-life, recidivist lying scumbag Cameron is, is allowed to drink themselves into oblivion to forget about how Cameron is desperately trying to turn once great Britain into a M*sl*m region of a corrupt, undemocratic, socialist super-state state run (as usual) by Germany.
Anyway, let me start you off:
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that he lied when he said he would reduce the cost of politics by cutting the number of our expenses-thieving MPs from 650 to 600”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that he lied when he said he would reduce immigration to the tens of thousands, no ifs no buts”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would apologise to Nigel Farage for the years of insults he has thrown at him and admit that Nigel Farage is a man of huge integrity, who has dedicated about 20 years of his life to saving Britain’s sovereignty, while Cameron is just a greasy, careerist liar who would anything to further his own lousy career”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that *sl*m is a horrifying, primitive, intolerant death cult that intends to take over the world and that *sl*m is not, and never has been, a religion of peace”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that Vladimir Putin was right all along and that the only way to stop the war in Syria is to work with Russia to help Assad regain control of his country”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that the biggest threat to world peace is *sl*m and he would work with Russia and America to build up a Christian alliance to defeat *sl*m in the coming Third World War”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that his supposed EU negotiation has been a charade and a failure, that he has achieved nothing for Britain and that the best thing for Britain would be to leave the sclerotic, over-bureaucratic, economically-crippled, failing EU”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that he has done a dirty little backroom deal with Merkel and Hollande – he keeps Britain in the EU and they then support him to be the next EU president”
“If David Cameron had any honour, he would admit that he is a treacherous lying piece of filth and agree to resign before he does any more damage to our country”.
That should get you started. You can leave comments by clicking on the headline of today’s post.
I can’t find the YouTube video I wanted to include in yesterday’s post. But I’ve managed to find a similar one.
Because immigrant M*sl*m men are intellectually, educationally and developmentally vastly inferior to white Europeans, the only way immigrant M*sl*m men can get the ‘respect’ they feel they deserve is not by earning it but by fear, intimidation and violence.
And we’re expected to believe that the kind of people featured in the video will grow up to be brain surgeons and website designers and engineers and suchlike. No, they will grow up to be members of feral, criminal gangs transforming most of our cities and major towns in M*sl*m ghettoes that are no-go areas for indigenous white Europeans as is already happening in Germany, France, Belgium, Sweden and Britain.
I worry that the short video below represents what will increasingly become a typical schoolday for the few white European children left anywhere near predominantly M*sl*m areas:
We all now know some of truth about what happened in Cologne on New Year’s Eve – at least 500 robberies and sexual assaults carried out by gangs of M*sl*m migrants; no action taken by the German police to protect German girls and women; blatant lies put out by the German authorities claiming the New Year celebrations had been largely peaceful; five days of the elites – police, politicians and media – desperately battling to cover up what happened; then finally the truth started to leak out. And even when we were starting to discover what happened, Cologne’s left-wing mayor tried to put the blame for what happened on the German women, not the M*sl*m migrant men.
Now it appears there has been a massive nationwide cover-up of the scale of crimes being committed by Merkel’s M*sl*m migrant men. The German elites have repeatedly claimed they had no statistics about the number of crimes committed by migrants. But it appears that the German police had been keeping a secret register of the number of crimes committed by migrants.
Now a patriot has leaked the report from Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Agency revealing that refugees committed over 208,344 crimes over the last 12 months. That’s around 570 a day. These crimes were mainly robbery, violence and sexual assault. And these are just the crimes that were reported and recorded. Who knows how many thousands more were not reported because the victims knew the police would do nothing or because they tried to report them but the police dissuaded them?
I rather suspect that this cover-up will not be reported by the British mainstream media as they’ll have been instructed to suppress any negative stories about migrants till after the EU in/out referendum
As the Empress of Europe, Merkel, swans around her continent giving orders to her cowering subjects while she is protected by tight security, I suspect that ordinary Germans are seeing their cities and towns being transformed into violent, dangerous slums:
Don’t give any more of your money to the overpaid, over-pensioned, self-serving, bare-faced liars at Oxfam, Save the Children, Christian Aid and UNICEF!
Why not? Because these charities (along with most aid agencies) are partly responsible for Africa’s poverty and the millions of uneducated, low-intelligence, unemployable, violent migrants that are now pouring out of basket-case Africa into Europe.
How do I get to this ‘crazy’ conclusion? Here’s how:
Since 1965, Africa has received foreign aid and charity money worth around $20bn a year (in today’s money) each year. After World War II, under the Marshall Plan Europe received around $20bn a year (in today’s money) for just five years and this kick-started the reconstruction of Europe and fifty years of prosperity for most Western Europeans.
But what happened in Africa which received the equivalent of ten Marshall Plans over the last fifty years? Where are the highways and factories? Where are the gleaming new cities? Where are the world-class hospitals and schools and colleges and leading universities and Nobel prizewinners? Where’s the prosperity that $20bn a year for fifty years should have brought?
Over 80% of Africans somehow manage to survive on less than $2 a day. Most of the money we’ve given for fifty years has been either stolen or wasted. Fifty years after money started pouring into Africa, we’re still being pressured to donate for clean water, mosquito nets and other basic items that should no longer be necessary had our money actually achieved something.
After the equivalent of ten Marshall Plans, most Africans live in squalor without electricity or running water. Most hardly get any healthcare at all. Moreover, most African children hardly get any education – no wonder the average IQ of the continent is around 70 (compared to around 100 in Europe and 103 in some parts of Asia).
For fifty years the main charities and aid agencies claimed they were achieving tremendous progress with our money. It was all lies. More Africans live in abject poverty now than before the great foreign aid and charity deluge started.
What the well-paid executives at the big charities and aid agencies didn’t tell us was that nothing was being achieved because of poor governance and corruption.
They didn’t tell us partly because they were afraid of being seen as racist if they criticised Africans and partly because they didn’t want to lose their well-paid jobs with big cars, big houses with servants and generous expense accounts while on international assignments.
The solution
Instead of lying to us for fifty years, what the charities and aid agencies should have done to try to force Africa’s failing poverty-trapped countries to reform would have been to impose conditions for receiving aid. For example, donor countries could have created say three levels of aid.
Level 1 would be emergency aid available to any country suffering a major famine, war, earthquake or other disaster.
Level 2 could be help to build schools, hospitals, roads, clean water supply and other basic infrastructure and would be dependent on that country meeting various targets in how it spent its revenues and agreeing to an external body controlling any transfer of money above perhaps $100,000 out of that country. Moreover, no citizen of that country would be allowed to hold a bank account in a foreign tax haven.
Level 3 might be assistance in power supply, sanitation, universities, house-building and agriculture providing that the country had an effective programme of population control, a democratically-elected government and at least one peaceful change of government.
Had the charities and aid agencies admitted that our money was being wasted and changed to way they worked to force change in Africa, the continent could now be prosperous and its impoverished hundreds of millions would have no need to flee to Europe. But the charities and aid agencies lied to us for fifty years.
Stop giving your money to the charlatans, cowards and liars at Oxfam, Save the Children, Christian Aid, Red Cross etc.
They lied to you for fifty years! They’re still lying to you!
And for anyone who hasn’t seen it, here’s my short (3 mins) YouTube video about the foreign aid farce:
(Hopefully my post today won’t be relevant to any of my regular readers)
Hello Indian sex tourists.
Here’s some friendly advice for you.
Now I realise that the most popular male participation sport in India is not cricket, but gang rape. And I realise that this is usually the gang-rape of lower caste girls in villages by groups of higher caste men. And, of course such rapes are seldom if ever punished due to the Indian police being utterly corrupt. Even when the girl is murdered after the rape to get rid of any witnesses, the police do nothing.
In Britain, we think of ‘safe sex’ as being when a condom is used. In India, ‘safe sex’ often involves the use of a hangman’s noose:
But as the Indian economy grows and the size of the urban middle classes increases, many Indian men are travelling to other Asian countries to get sex rather than relying on gang-rape in their own country. Progress is a wonderful thing!
Anyway, having talked to a policeman in the Land of Smells, I have some possibly useful advice for Indian sex tourists going there:
Choose the uglier, fatter, older women – those whom I believe you call “aunties” – as they will be more desperate for clients and money. Why? Because the reputation of Indian sex tourists is so bad that many of the younger, more beautiful girls are now refusing to have sex with Indian men.
There seem to be four main reasons that the girls don’t want anything to do with Indian sex tourists:
The smell apparently (according to the policeman) the girls complain that Indian men smell awful. Probably it’s a combination of the food they eat, the infrequency of taking showers and the inability to understand how to use a toilet properly
Group sex while men from most other places – Europe, Japan, Korea, the USA – usually have one man taking one girl for sex, Indian sex tourists almost always want group sex with three, four or even five men all banging one girl at the same time. Apparently many girls dislike this, hence only the uglier, more desperate ones will agree to this
Cheating the girls in the Land of Smells, payment is normally made after the work is finished. However, word has got around that many Indian men have refused to pay what was agreed. The policeman told me that the police were forever getting complaints from prostitutes who had been cheated by Indian men, but the police’s policy was that this was a private matter between the prostitutes and their clients and nothing to do with the police. As for those prostitutes who will go with Indian men, most now demand payment upfront from Indians so they don’t get cheated. All other nationalities still pay after the act as the prostitutes can trust them not to try to cheat them and even to give a tip over and above the amount originally agreed if the service is good
Gang rape the prostitutes have also got wise to another trick Indian sex tourists play. One or two men will take a prostitute back to their hotel room for sex. But they’ll leave the door unlocked and once sex starts, four or five of their friends will come in and also have sex with the girl. But, in spite of more men than agreed having sex with the girl, the Indians won’t pay any more than was agreed at the start or they may even refuse to pay that much
So, my Indian friends. I hope you find this friendly advice useful.
The girls in the Land of Smells are wising up. They’re learning what you’re really like and many will have nothing to do with you because you’re such disgusting, foul-smelling, cheap, lying, thieving, cheating scum.
It really takes some doing to be despised even by prostitutes but, Indian sex tourists, you seem to have managed it. Congratulations!
(After a brief moment of levity yesterday, it’s back to the serious stuff today)
Here’s a truly frightening story from Scrotland,
Police have arrested a 40-year old man in Scotland over a number of allegedly “offensive” Facebook posts about refugees.
Police in Scotland said that a man had been held under the Communications Act, which bans “grossly offensive” and “menacing” posts on online platforms.
The Facebook posts in question, which were not released to the media, allegedly concerned comments about Syrian refugees from Rothersay, on the Scottish Island of Bute, where several refugee families have settled as part of the UK government’s settlement program.
A spokesman from the the Dunoon police station in Argyll said, “I hope that the arrest of this individual sends a clear message that Police Scotland will not tolerate any form of activity which could incite hatred and provoke offensive comments on social media”.
This follows news in late January that police in the Netherlands were visiting the homes of citizens who made posts that were deemed overly-critical of the Dutch government’s policies towards refugees. It also follows Facebook’s announcement that it would work with European governments, particularly Germany, to track and clamp down on hostility towards migrants on the platform.
The moronic, followers of the Religion of Peace can say or do what they like. But if we indigenous Europeans dare express any doubts about our governments’ plans to replace us with violent, low-intelligence, misogynist, intolerant, religiously-backward, illiterate, unemployable Third-World garbage, then our useless politically-correct police will leap into action.
Well, as an indigenous Brit, I find this offensive:
And this:
And this:
And this:
I find these offensive and likely to incite hatred and violence.
But if I dare say anything, I’ll probably be arrested.
How did we allow this to happen to our once great country?
David Craig, on February 29th, 2016
