It’s easy for journalists to write ‘we’re doomed’ bad news stories. Bad, alarmist news sells better than good news. In fact, there’s an old journalism adage “if it bleeds, it leads” – if a journalist can write a story with tons of victims, then they’re likely to have their story leading in whatever news programme or publication they work.
But here is a chart which actually does show that we are doomed. It’s a chart that you’re unlikely see in the mainstream media as to show it would be “waaaccciiissssttttt”. This simple chart shows the projected population growth in Africa compared to Europe’s population decline:
Pretty impressive, huh?
The population of Africa increases by over 60 million every year. Taking the average current life expectancy of an African at around 65, this means that around 18 million Africans die each year while another 78 million are born each year. That’s 213,698 per day: 8,904 per hour:148 per minute. And over 90% of all these additions to Africa’s population will be born into abject, inescapable grinding poverty.
Today there are over 1.2 billion Africans. Within most of our lifetimes in 20 years there will be over 2.4 billion Africans. By the end of this century there will be 3.57 billion Africans.
Where are the extra 600 million Africans being added to Africa’s population every 10 years going to get food and shelter? In Africa? Not a chance. Stupidity, backwardness, ignorance, religion and violence prevent most African countries from developing the resources needed to support their rapidly growing populations. In fact, many African countries – Rhodesia, South Africa, Nigeria etc – are actually going backwards. They’re being destroyed, rather than being developed, by their utterly corrupt, incompetent, useless, multi-billionaire rulers.
So they’re producing less food and less wealth while their populations are rapidly increasing.
That is not a recipe for success.
Each year millions, in fact tens of millions, of Africans will have to move to survive. And where will they move to? Yup, you guessed it, you’re all more intelligent than our ruling elites. Millions, or even tens of millions, of Africans will swarm to Europe.
The one to two million migrants a year we’re seeing at the moment is just the start of the ‘great migration’. Soon it will be three or five or even ten million a year heading for the good life in Europe.
I don’t blame them. You or I would do the same.
Then, of course, you have to add in millions more migrants fleeing their wrecked countries in the Middle East. I could include a chart of population growth in the Arab Middle East countries. But I think we all know what this would show.
But how can our society, economies, culture and social systems absorb this invasion of African and Middle-East migrants most of whom will be illiterate, inbred, religiously backward, full of a sense of grievance towards the wealthy West, unemployable and violent?
It really is difficult to see a future for Europe unless we close the borders.
But our rulers would never do that because of the howling fury of the progressive, holier-than-thou, brain-dead libtards who control all the mainstream media and attention-seeking, virtue-signalling, look-at-me, multi-millionaire celebs.
Here we go again. Yawn! Yet another supposed famine in Africa. And the useless, corrupt, Islamophiliac UN is claiming that the world is possibly facing “the greatest humanitarian disaster in 60 years”.
So, prepare yourself for endless BBC and Channel 4 reports showing starving children and endless charity TV ads featuring multimillionaire, tax-avoiding, virtue-signalling celebs telling you to give your money to greedy, self-serving, corrupt, wasteful charities.
The UN has identified four countries which are supposedly at risk from serious famine – Yemen, South Sudan, Somalia and Nigeria.
So, let’s have a look at these four countries and try to guess why their people don’t have enough to eat:
Yemen
Here’s Yemen’s population growth:
In 1960 there were about 5 million Yemenis. Now there are over 25 million.
Yet Yemeni agriculture (like agriculture in so many Mooserlum countries) probably hasn’t evolved for the last thousand years. So, of course there isn’t enough food to sustain this irresponsible population growth.
Oh, and in addition to population growth that is totally out of control, the Yemenis (like so many good Mooserlum countries) have decided to have a civil war.
Moreover, Yemen is number 170 out of 176 on Transparency International’s list of the world’s most corrupt countries. Most of the little money the country does receive gets looted by the ruling elites and put into offshore bank accounts rather than being invested in things like food production, healthcare, education, roads etc.
So, what’s the reason for Yemen’s famine? Lack of food? Or overpopulation, corruption, backwardness and civil war?
South Sudan
As South Sudan is a fairly new country, here’s the population growth rate for Sudan:
In 1960 there were less than 12 million Sudanese. Now there are over 50 million.
(Incidentally, looking at the chart above, we can expect to soon be told there’s also famine in Ethiopia)
Yet Sudanese agriculture (like agriculture in so many Mooserlum countries) probably hasn’t evolved for the last thousand years. So, of course there isn’t enough food to sustain this irresponsible population growth. And when there are too few resources and too many people, civil war inevitably breaks out. And South Sudan has been engaged in civil war almost from the moment the country was founded in 2011.
Moreover, South Sudan is number 175 out of 176 on Transparency International’s list of the world’s most corrupt countries. Yup, it’s the world’s second most corrupt country. Congratulations to South Sudan’s rulers. That’s quite an achievement. This means that most of the little money the country does receive gets looted by the ruling elites rather than being invested in things like food production, healthcare, education etc.
So, what’s the reason for South Sudan’s famine? Lack of food? Or overpopulation, corruption, backwardness and civil war?
Somalia
Here’s the population growth for Somalia:
In 1960, the population of Somalia was less than 3 million. Now it’s probably over 10 million.
Ooohh, surely even a progressive, holier-than-thou, West-loathing, mentally-retarded Guardian reader could start to see some similarities between these countries supposedly facing ‘famine’.
Yet Somali agriculture (like agriculture in so many Mooserlum countries) probably hasn’t evolved for the last thousand years. So, of course there isn’t enough food to sustain this irresponsible population growth. And when there are too few resources and too many people, civil war inevitably breaks out. I’m not sure whether these is full-on civil war in Somalia at the moment (there usually is) or just local tribal and religious conflicts and quite honestly, I don’t really care. But I suspect there is widespread violence preventing any form of economic development.
Somalia, at number 176, is the world’s most corrupt country on Transparency International’s list of the world’s most corrupt countries. So, more congratulations are due. That’s quite incredible managing to be the world’s most corrupt country. After all, there’s a fair bit of stiff competition. Most of the little money the country does receive gets looted by the ruling elites rather than being invested in things like food production, healthcare, education etc.
So, what’s the reason for Somalia’s famine? Lack of food? Or overpopulation, corruption, backwardness and civil war?
Nigeria
This is the real ‘big beast’. Nigeria’s population was ‘only’ about 50 million in 1960. Now it’s about 170 million and by 2050 is set to hit 300 million.
Where is Nigeria going to find enough food to feed these hundreds of millions? Especially as Nigeria is descending into civil war between the Christians and the adherents of the Religion of Peace.
As for corruption, Nigeria is famous for making every one of its rulers and their thousands of cronies and hangers-on billionaires from stealing the country’s oil revenues. Though Nigeria is only at number 136 on Transparency International’s list of the world’s most corrupt countries. So the utterly venal, kleptocratic Nigerians are angels compared to the execrable Somalis, Yemenis and South Sudanese.
So, what’s the reason for Nigeria’s famine? Lack of food? Or overpopulation, corruption, backwardness and civil war?
Conclusion
For fifty years, the West has sent more money each year to Africa than Europe received each year for just five years under the Marshall Plan after WWII. Europe managed to rebuild itself in just a few years. After over fifty years of an avalanche of money every year, Africa now has more people in extreme poverty than it had in 1960.
So, where have our billions in aid gone? Where are all the roads and clean water plants, where are the booming farms? Where are the hospitals and universities? Why is the whole continent just a stinking, impoverished, disease-ridden, starving, worthless cesspit?
If you want to give money to charity, sponsor a guide dog in Britain. That will do a lot more good than wasting your money on Africa.
For those who haven’t seen it, here’s a short (3 minutes) video I made showing the utter futility of sending any money to any African country:
I wanted to write about the supposed famine in several African countries today and explain why we shouldn’t be conned into giving any money however many multimillionaire, tax-avoiding celebs appear on charity TV ads to order us to hand over our cash. But there’s another story which deserves to be mentioned. It’s not very exciting or sexy. But it is still important in a way as it shows yet again how the globalist, West-hating elites and the mainstream media continually lie to us in order to fool us into supporting them and the status quo rather than voting for patriotic parties who want to protect European civilisation from the Third-World invasion .
You probably know that first Germany and then the Netherlands have banned political rallies in Germany and the Netherlands planned by Turkey’s President Erdogan to gain support from expat Turks for his proposed changes to the Turkish constitution to give himself more power to turn Turkey into an oppressive, one-party Islamic State.
The German and Dutch governments claim they’ve banned the rallies because of fear of public disorder. Erdogan however has blasted the German and Dutch governments calling the ban undemocratic and accusing the Germans of being Nazis and the Dutch of being fascists.
There are two possible reasons why the Turkish rallies were banned:
Security: You could believe the mainstream media reports that the German and Dutch governments acted in the best interests of their citizens in banning the rallies to maintain public order
Censorship: Or, if you were cynical, you might think that with elections coming up in both Germany and the Netherlands and with anti-immigration parties (AfD in Germany and Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party in the Netherlands) gaining ever more support, the last thing the establishment wanted their citizens to see would be hundreds of thousands of German and Dutch Turks all gathered together in one place. Such gatherings would bring home to the Germans and Dutch just how many foreigners were living in their countries and probably increase support for the anti-immigration parties. So the German and Dutch governments hit upon the feeble excuse of public order to have these rallies banned.
There are an estimated 4 million Turks in Germany. One in every 20 Germans is Turkish. In the much smaller Netherlands there are ‘only’ around 500,000 Turks – ‘only’ one in every 30 Dutch is Turkish.
In this little spat between Erdogan on one side and Merkel and Rutte on the other, I’m inclined to agree with Erdogan. I believe the rallies were banned because the treacherous, lying, West-hating scum Merkel and Rutte were terrified that the rallies would increase support for the patriotic, anti-immigration parties in the coming German and Dutch elections.
It’s surely odd that none of the mainstream media seem to have considered this possibility!
It’s spring (well almost). And love is in the air.
This is especially true in Germany. Until Merkel set up a ferry service to bring a couple of million Africans to Europe, lonely, old, ugly, embittered German women (like Merkel) had to travel to African countries like the Gambia for romance and what the porn industry refers to as ‘bbc’.
But now that Africa has come to Germany, German women can get ‘love’ and ‘bbc’ in their own home towns. They just need to hang out near their local migrant centre.
Below is a very short video of a lovely, loving couple. They are very much in love even though the young man seems unable to speak a word of German and the old woman doesn’t seem to speak a word of English. But clearly the language barrier hasn’t stood in the way of their blossoming love. True love will always find a way.
Aaaahhh, how touching. Aaahhh how charming love is.
Though for some reason, which I am unable to understand, the person posting the video has titled it “The easy way to a German passport“.
We all know that the progressive, lefty, libtard BBC is constantly in breach of its charter by being ludicrously biased.
The BBC is embarrassingly biased in its support for EU membership, for Germans to run Britain, for uncontrolled immigration, for Muslim invasion and takeover and against Britain’s independence, against British values and against any form of patriotism and national pride.
Usually the BBC’s bias obvious. But sometimes it can be quite subtle.
This story was spotted by someone much more intelligent than myself. It concerns an Indian Muslim athlete from Indian Kashmir who traveled to America to compete in some competition.
When the athlete initially applied for a visa there was some problem with his papers and he was at first denied a visa. His agent claimed that the visa had been denied due to President Trump’s supposed travel ban on Muslims. The BBC was quick to pick up the story with the headline Kashmir Muslim athlete denied US visa due to ‘current policy’. This stressed the fact that the athlete was a Muslim.
In fact, the reason the athlete was at first denied a visa had nothing to do with Trump’s ‘current policy’ as India wasn’t one of the 7 countries covered by the temporary travel restrictions. But, of course, the BBC never lets the truth get in the way of a good pro-Muslim, anti-Trump story.
Anyway, following the intervention of some idiotic, US-hating Democrat politicians, the man finally got his visa. While the gentleman was in America, there was an unfortunate ‘misunderstanding’ between the athlete and a 12-year-old American girl. Surprisingly, the BBC also reported the story. However, there was a small difference in the BBC’s description of the man. The headline read Indian athlete in sex abuse in US.
For the BBC, the athlete was no longer a ‘Muslim’. Now he was an ‘Indian’ and no mention was made of his religion. Why not? Because for the biased BBC, Muslims are always victims. When something unpleasant happens to (or more usually is falsely claimed to happen to) a Muslim, the BBC is quick to stress the religion of the victim. But when a Muslim is a perpetrator, the BBC carefully avoids mentioning the person’s religion. Then the person is an Indian or an Asian or even a British man. But for the BBC, he is never a Muslim.
It’s time to scrap the TV licence and make the BBC a subscription-only service. Then it would be interesting to see how many viewers actually want to pay for a constant barrage of Britain-loathing, German-loving, Islamophiliac, lefty, progressive, libtard propaganda.
Meanwhile, it seems to have been a lively few hours in Europe with an axe-wielding man attacking travellers in Düsseldorf station and two men shooting a few people in a cafe in Switzerland. The BBC is already telling us that the axeman was from the former Yugoslavia (that means he was most probably a Muslim though, as explained above, when a criminal is a Muslim, the BBC only mentions their country of origin not their religion) and that he was “known to have psychological problems”. Surprise, surprise. It’s amazing how quickly after each Religion of Peace attack the BBC discovers that the attacker had ‘psychological problems’. No doubt the two Swiss gunmen will also be found to have ‘psychological problems’ and the two attacks will HNTDWI.
Here’s a picture of an article from a German newspaper. According to the caption, it features a supposedly “17-year-old” Afghan child refugee called Ahmad Shah Hussein phoning his mum back in Afghanistan. How touching. See, these child refugees really need our help.
Hold on a minute! How stupid do the journalists and politicians think we are?
He’s 17 years old? He’s a child refugee?
Come on, give us a break! Are we really meant to believe this grown man is a 17-year-old child refugee?
Please think of this picture next time you hear a progressive, brain-dead, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling libtard or vacuous celeb demanding we take in more “child refugees”:
I’d like to wish you all a very merry International Women’s Day.
How are you today? Still furious that Crooked Hilary Clinton lost? Still trying to overturn the vote of the American people?
Do you think you might have a moment free from your pathetic protests against the elected US President Donald Trump?
If so, why not watch this short video of one of your beloved imams explaining how women must allow themselves to be subjugated by men?
How about protesting outside his mosque in Montreal, Canada?
After all, on this International Women’s Day I’m sure you all want to stand up for your sisters around the world.
Oh, of course, I forgot about your ridiculous double standards. You couldn’t give a toss about 600 million women being brutally oppressed and mistreated in Religion of Peace countries. But you rant and scream and froth at the mouth against the supposed ‘Great Misogynist’, Donald Trump.
Dear brain-dead, libtard, self-righteous, virtue-signalling, self-obsessed feminazis, your double standards are truly morally repulsive:
Someone I know is a tough gentleman. He spent 17 years in the French army as a paratrooper serving in some quite unpleasant places dealing with some extremely unpleasant people. He now works for the police in a Third-World country where the ‘bad guys’ really are pretty bad and will do anything to avoid going to prison as the prisons not like the luxury hotel-like prisons we have in Britain.
His mother got dementia in her late sixties. She is now in a private care home, is doubly incontinent, cannot walk or talk, cannot feed herself and cannot recognise either her husband or her son. When she is awake, she just sits in a chair staring blankly at the wall. However, as she is now only 75, her body could go on like this for many more years. This situation is devastating her family emotionally, psychologically and financially. And what’s the point? What’s the point of her carrying on living? But as euthanasia is illegal in France the family can do nothing.
Until last weekend, I’ve never really bothered thinking too much about life and death and all that serious kind of stuff. But as doctors cure ever more physical diseases while making little progress on deterioration of the brain, we need to start questioning at what point life should be allowed to end.
As far as I can see, we should start considering permitting euthanasia in certain situations.
For example, we could have some kind of “Quality of Life” assessment. So, if someone cannot feed themselves, cannot talk, cannot walk, cannot recognise their own family and is doubly incontinent, then they would get a pretty low “Quality of Life” score. Then when anyone scores below a certain level, the family should be allowed to let them ‘do a Dignitas’.
Of course, there need to be safeguards to prevent the “Quality of Life” assessment system being abused.
But our current practice of preserving life at all costs is clearly unsuited to today’s situation where many thousands of people exist as helpless, hopeless vegetables without the slightest chance of any improvement in their condition.
Our laws are now lagging far behind medical progress and need to be changed.
I’ve spent much of the last two days in a hospital ward for severe stroke victims trying to communicate with something that was once my mother but now was unable to walk, unable to speak (apart from incomprehensible moaning) and no longer recognised either me or my sister.
It’s quite a shock to see someone, who at 90 still went out for lunch a few times a week, went to the theatre twice a month and enjoyed going out walking the dog transformed overnight into a helpless, hopeless invalid.
When I eventually left the hospital, I ate a big fillet steak accompanied by a good red wine and then did some other things that cannot be mentioned on a polite blog like snouts-in-the-trough. Strangely, as anyone who has attended a funeral will know, there is nothing so life-enhancing than being faced with a ‘memento mori’ – in my case, some stroke patients who suddenly went from healthy, happy people to hopeless basket cases that would never recover from their condition.
(Please don’t think I’m callous. But I spent over 20 years married to a cancer surgeon, then over 10 years with someone specialising in ‘palliative care’ – basically, when my current wife turns up, it’s time to start buying the flowers and planning the funeral. So, I’m possibly more immune than most people to stories of suffering and death)
A few years ago, the former editor of the British Medical Journal claimed that cancer is the best way to die because it gives people the chance to come to terms with their own mortality and prepare for their own deaths.
Dr Richard Smith, an honorary professor at the University of Warwick, said that a protracted death allowed time to say goodbye to loved ones, to organise one’s financial affairs, listen to favourite pieces or music or poetry and leave final messages.
He claimed that any pain of dying could be made bearable through ‘love, morphine, and whisky’’.
Writing in a blog for the BMJ, Dr Smith admitted that his view was ‘romantic’, but said charities should stop spending billions trying to find a cure for the disease because it was clearly the best option for an ageing population. After all, we all have to die. So, better to have a death that is predictable than one that is totally unexpected like a debilitating stroke that condemns you to years living as a helpless, hopeless, incontinent invalid or a car accident that kills you when you and your family had expected you to live for many more years.
And certainly better than a truly ghastly Alzheimers/Dementia sickness and death where your body may survive long after your brain has died.
Of course, the doctor’s article was immediately denounced by the usual lefty, progressive, holier-than-thou, we-always-know-better libtards whose only purpose in life is to find something at which to be offended and crowds of them took to the media to accuse the doctor of “insensitivity”. For libtards, mentioning death seems to be “insensitive”. Perhaps libtards think they will live forever?
Having watched my father die of cancer at the age of 54, I feel inclined to agree with the doctor. Of course, at 54 my father was far too young to die. But the fact that he died of lung cancer, having smoked two packets of cigarettes a day for decades, meant he had time to prepare for his death and organise his finances for after he had gone. Though sadly, as my father never had much money, there was precious little to organise.
There is a strong likelihood you will die some day. Yes, really. You will die, even if you are a self-righteous, brainless, West-loathing, self-satisfied, preening, virtue-signalling, offended-by-everything, Trump-hating, EU-loving libtard.
Having seen the catastrophic effects of severe strokes on patients and their families, I feel inclined to agree with the good doctor. Perhaps cancer, at a ripe old age, is the best way to depart this life?
Following a close family member having a serious stroke, I have very little time today. But still I thought I’d take a few moments to invite you to play a new game that’s all the rage.
This is a new game that every stupid, West-loathing, progressive, lefty, libtard and vacuous, multi-millionare luvvie is playing. The game’s called “Mock the Messenger”.
Let me explain the rules. They’re very simple. Of course they’re simple. Otherwise idiotic, self-regarding, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling libtards and vacuous, attention-seeking, celeb luvvies wouldn’t be able to play.
Step 1: A patriotic, sensible person expresses concern that allowing an army of millions of primitive, mostly uneducated, mostly illiterate, often inbred, low-IQ, violent, West-hating, sex-obsessed Third-World invaders (mostly male of military age) into civilised Western countries may threaten social cohesion and may put an unsupportable burden on areas like healthcare, education, housing and policing. Usually the sensible, patriotic person will have sufficient statistical evidence of increasing violent crime (especially rape) to back up their concerns in spite of the attempts of the ruling elites to cover up the catastrophe that mass, uncontrolled immigration is causing
Step 2: West-loathing, progressive, liberal, hug-a-migrant libtards, vacuous luvvies and mainstream media pundits find they have no arguments to contradict the sensible patriots’ claims of Western countries and even civilisation being threatened by the Third-World invasion. So instead they resort to mockery and name calling.
That’s it. See, anyone can play – if they’re stupid enough to be unaware of what is happening around them.
For years, Nigel Farage, Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen have been ridiculed by the ruling elites and their obedient mainstream media. Yet everything that Farage, Wilders and Le Pen have warned us about has happened.
More recently, a Swedish police inspector from the small, once peaceful town of Örebro, Peter Springare, dared to speak out about most violent crime in Orebro being committed by what are called the “new Swedes”. The Swedish Prime Minister mockingly dismissed Springare’s claims by twisting his words: “I don’t know what it looks like in Örebro, but from a broader perspective I have a very hard time believing 100 per cent of police investigation resources are spend on crimes committed by immigrants. I would say that it is wrong.”
But, of course, the greatest target for this super new game, “Mock the Messenger”, is US President Donald Trump.
Trump is an easy target as he is not nearly as articulate as professional politicians like crooked Hilary Clinton or Barry ‘All talk no trousers’ Obummer. Every time Trump says something that most normal people would agree with – like daring to mention the social chaos uncontrolled immigration is causing in Sweden and Germany – the howls of scorn and mockery and contempt from the ruling elites, the progressive, bring-in-more-migrants libtards and the multimillionaire, virtue-signalling, look-at-me-me-me luvvies and the mainstream media are deafening.
We don’t get any arguments from the cackling, howling, lobotomised libtards, luvvies and their mainstream media. All we get is mockery, scorn and insults.
So, come on. Let’s all play “Mock the Messenger” till we wake up one day and find our countries are descending into civil war between the indigenous populations and the invading Third-World armies. Then all the libtards will go rushing to the messengers they mocked for so long and beg for help.
David Craig, on March 15th, 2017
