The enrichment being brought to Europe by Merkel’s millions of rapemigrants is not just multi-cultural. They’re also bringing loads of exotic Third-World diseases that were long since eradicated in the civilised West.
The Infectious Disease Epidemiology Annual Report — which was published on July 12, 2017 and provides data on the status of more than 50 infectious diseases in Germany during 2016 — offers the first glimpse into the public health consequences of the massive influx of migrants in late 2015.
And a recent tuberculosis scare in a small town which sheltered a Somali enricher has cast a renewed spotlight on the increased risk of infectious diseases in Germany since Chancellor Angela Merkel allowed in around two million migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East.
The report’s statistics may be just the tip of the iceberg. The number of reported cases of tuberculosis, for example, was 5,915 in 2016, up from 4,488 cases in 2014, an increase of more than 30% during that period. Some doctors, however, believe that the actual number of cases of tuberculosis is far higher and have accused the report of downplaying the threat in an effort to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments.
In an interview with Focus, Carsten Boos, an orthopedic surgeon, warned that German authorities have lost track of hundreds of thousands of migrants who may be infected. He added that 40% of all tuberculosis pathogens are multidrug-resistant and therefore inherently dangerous to the general population.
What’s more:
Hospitals are overwhelmed by the Third-World invaders and cannot continue to provide care for taxpaying Germans.
Many male invaders refuse to be cared for by female medics and men refuse to let their wives or daughters be cared for by male medics.
Some invaders stabbed a doctor and some nurses when the child they had neglected died in a hospital. One injured physician had to undergo surgery and two nurses are laid up in the ICU. Nobody has been prosecuted. Nobody was punished. It’s part of their culture, you see.
Clinics are shipping hostile refugees to hospitals because they cannot them.
Some invaders abandon their sick children when asked to pay for their medications: When they learn they have to pay cash, it leads to unbelievable outbursts. They abandon the children with pharmacy staff with the words: ‘So, cure them here yourselves!’
And here to cheer us up are two of our friends from the world’s most peaceful religion having a discussion on TV. As our rulers keep telling us, there is much we have to learn from the world’s greatest religion:
Have you wondered why every week 20,000 pieces of illiterate, violent, intolerant, unemployable, rape-obsessed human garbage are being ferried in luxury at our expense from Libya to Europe every week? Well, I’ve just discovered one of the reasons – Amnesty International.
Amnesty International used to do good work helping defend dissidents who had been imprisoned by dictators and fascist regimes around the world. But more recently, like so many organisations, Amnesty International has been taken over by stupid, lefty, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling West-hating libtards who see it as their role in life to destroy Western civilisation.
How do I know this? Because I looked at the Amnesty International website and here’s one thing I found:
In 2009, an Italian ship forcibly returned 24 ‘refugees’ (rapemigrants?) from Somalia and Eritrea to their point of departure in Libya. Amnesty International then pursued a case at the European Court of Human Rights claiming that Italy “violated human rights principles by spurning African migrants and asylum-seekers on the high seas”. In February 2012 the European Court of Human Rights naturally concluded that Italy had been in the wrong and that we Europeans were now somehow responsible for every African who quite fancied a life living off benefits and crime in Europe.
Just to prove I am not a mad conspiracy theorist, I attach below (in red) the piece from the official Amnesty International website boasting about Amnesty International’s supposed “success”.
Though this doesn’t explain why European ships are not taking the rapemigrants to the nearest safe port – which would be in Tunisia- and instead are bringing them in their millions to Europe. You’d have to ask our rulers why they’re so keen on their policy of race replacement.
But if Amnesty International ever come calling asking for a donation, please tell them to go f**k themselves as they’ll be using your money to destroy your life.
And finally, just to cheer us up a little on this cold, damp Monday morning, I attach a link to a short video where some Danes in the city of Roskilde play the Moozerlum call to prayer outside the mayoress’s residence at 05.00 in the morning to try to make her aware of the effect Moozerlumification is having on ordinary people’s lives.
The European Court of Human Rights on Thursday ruled that Italy violated human rights principles by spurning African migrants and asylum-seekers on the high seas, a judgment hailed as historic by Amnesty International. In the case, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, the Court considered the plight of 24 people from Somalia and Eritrea who were among more than 200 people intercepted at sea by Italian authorities in 2009 and forced to return to Libya, their point of departure. The practice violated international obligations to not return individuals to countries where they could be at risk of human rights abuses. “This historic judgment is a damning verdict on Italy’s willingness to cooperate with Colonel Mu’ammar al-Gaddafi’s government in Libya, which was known to systematically abuse human rights,” said Sherif Elsayed-Ali, Amnesty International’s Head of Refugee and Migrants’ Rights.“The ruling strengthens respect for human rights across Europe and upholds international legal safeguards for migrants and asylum-seekers.” The Court found that Italy violated the European Convention of Human Rights by exposing the migrants to the risk of being subjected to ill-treatment in Libya and being repatriated to Somalia and Eritrea. Amnesty International intervened as third party in the case, jointly with the AIRE Centre and the Fédération internationale des ligues des droits de l’Homme (FIDH), pointing out that the Italian authorities’ actions began a policy of push-backs that were condemned for breaching fundamental principles of international human rights law.
The Court’s judgment establishes that even when individuals are intercepted in international waters, government authorities are obliged to abide by international human rights law. Anybody they intercept must have access to an individualized procedure as well as remedies to challenge the decision to return them to their country of departure. The Court found such removals operated outside national territory constituted collective expulsion. “States intercepting individuals outside their territorial waters cannot operate in a legal vacuum,” said Sherif Elsayed-Ali. “Even on the high seas, international human rights norms still apply, including the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits returning people to a country where they run the risk of human rights abuses.”
The European Court judgment comes at a time when new governments are in place in both Italy and Libya. However, Amnesty International has documented that Sub-Saharan African migrants in Libya are still at risk of torture or other ill-treatment, and many have been arbitrarily detained on the basis of their legal status in the country. Both governments are currently re-establishing cooperation ties on a number of issues, including migration control.“It is regrettable that one of the first decisions of the National Transitional Council and the new Italian government, rather than rejecting such cooperation, has actually been to recommit to cooperation in the field of migration control,” said Sherif Elsayed-Ali.“The principles upheld by this judgment must inform any cooperation on migration control between the Italian government and the new Libyan authorities.”
It should have been simple. My mother, who died recently, left a very clear will. Moreover, given her dementia, one member of our family had Power of Attorney. But months after my mother’s death, the little money she had remains trapped in legal complexities meanwhile a whole host of parasites – solicitors, bankers, stockbrokers and suchlike – have been trying to siphon off my mother’s money into their own pockets by trying to charge massive fees for little to no work.
But our family is lucky. My mother made one of her children executor of her will. So she managed to avoid the deadly mistake many elderly, especially middle-class, people make – appointing a ‘trusted’ solicitor as executor. However, being involved in sorting out my mother’s will has opened my eyes to a possibly huge amount of deceit and crime, involving many millions of pounds each year, of which most people are probably blissfully unaware – even when they are the victims.
Just Google something like “solicitor stole from inheritance” or “solicitor stole from will” and you’ll get page after page of stories of crooked solicitors who have stolen hundreds of thousands of pounds when people have trusted them by appointing them as executors of their will.
Here’s one of many:
A crooked probate lawyer stole £210,000 by writing himself into his clients’ wills, charging inflating fees and convincing them to give him large cash ‘gifts’, a court heard.
Keith Webber, 67, gained the trust of four ‘elderly and vulnerable people’ – including his own sister-in-law – who made him sole executor of their wills and trusted him implicitly.
But he then used a variety of methods to steal their money, including exaggerating his fees and persuading them to sign over assets into his name, Bristol Crown Court heard.
Prosecutors claim that in one case he made himself the main beneficiary of a will, and in another continued taking his client’s money even after she had died.
For one ploy he turned against his own family to empty his sister-in-law’s account, while on another he claimed to be in a relationship with his victim to avert suspicion, a jury was told.
In Britain we tend to avoid talking about three things with our families – money, sex and death. Let’s forget ‘sex’ for the moment. You can find out about that by buying my latest book FORGET THE FOREPLAY. Let’s just focus on ‘money’ and ‘death‘. As we tend not to discuss ‘money’ and ‘death’, most people won’t know exactly how much money (property, shares, premium bonds, savings etc) a deceased parent, relative or friend had. Nor will most people understand the complicated legal ins and outs of dealing with a will. This creates wonderful opportunities for solicitors to enrich themselves at their clients’ expense.
There seem to be 3 main tricks solicitors use to loot their naive and trusting clients’ estates;
Massively overcharging on fees for work that may not even be done
Writing themselves into a will
Simply stealing money by transferring it into their own bank accounts confident that few if any of the designated heirs will have any idea how much was originally in a deceased person’s estate and therefore they won’t know if £50,000 or even £100,000 have gone AWOL
There are few British towns as middle class as Chichester. It’s the kind of place where many middle-class people retire. -It’s an attractive town with a lively arts and theatre scene and where property prices are quite reasonable. It’s also the kind of town where local solicitors are members of the main golf clubs, tennis clubs, Conservative club and other such middle-class institutions. And it’s by networking at these middle-class institutions that many local solicitors get work by tricking nice, middle-class people into trusting them with things like being executors for their wills.
So, to end today’s blog, here’s a nice story from Chichester. In this case, the crooked solicitors were exposed. But something like this is probably being repeated across the country many times each year and most ‘ever so respectable’ solicitors are probably getting away with their crimes:
A solicitor, a legal executive and an associate of a Selsey-based law firm have been convicted and sentenced to more than 14 years combined. The trio were found guilty of the embezzlement of almost £700,000 of client funds over a seven year period following a nine week trial at Southwark Crown Court, police said.
Emma Coates, 47, of no fixed abode, but formally of Selsey, was sentenced to six years after being found guilty of two counts of fraud by abuse of position, according to police.
A spokesperson for Sussex Police said: “Between December 2008 and November 2011, when employed as a legal executive at CK Solicitors, Coates was responsible for making a series of transfers from the firm’s client accounts to her own”. Following an intervention by the Solicitor Regulatory Authority (SRA), CK Solicitors was closed in 2011. Coates went on to establish Coates & Co and was able to defraud clients and steal funds coming into her possession when acting as an executor for local Selsey residents – this came to light during 2014 when the investigation was passed to officers of the Sussex Police Economic Crime Unit. “During the six year period it emerged that Coates used client money to fund a lavish lifestyle – spending £10,000 on a hot tub, purchasing a Range Rover and financing a holiday to Barbados for herself and a group of friends. She regularly attended horse races at both Cheltenham and Goodwood, and at least some of the client money was used to finance monthly mortgage payments on a series of properties bought by her.”
Simon Kenny, 60, of Tudor Avenue, St Leonards was sentenced to six years after being found guilty of two counts of fraud by abuse of his position, police said. The offences occurred between January 2007 and May 2011 while he was the principal solicitor at CK Solicitors as well as a district judge. Kenny was convicted in respect of transferring client money to cover the money they had drawn from the firm. A spokesperson from Sussex Police said: “The extent of Kenny’s deceit was exposed by the tragic death of the firm’s accountant, Robert Foskett, who realised that he had become unwittingly involved in the fraud – a realisation which troubled him so much that he ended up taking his own life, and naming Kenny in his suicide note”.
The question for today’s blog is whether Britains Moozerlums are mostly for us or mostly against us.
A few weeks ago, I pointed out that if official claims are true, then with 23,000 radicalised Mooozerlums in Britain, who apparently support terrorist attacks against us, then Britain’s anti-British Moozerlum potential army is larger than the military forces of some European countries.
The chart below lists the country, the size of the military, the population and the number of military personnel per 100,000 of population:
You’ll see two things from these figures
As stated above, Britain’s anti-British Moozerlums are more numerous than the military forces of several European countries
Britain has 7.7 radicalised Moozerlums per 100,000 of the Moozerlum population, whereas in most countries only about 2 to 3 people per 100,000 join the military
Before I get accused of waacciiisssmm and hate crimes and other such rubbish, please note that all I have done is to take official, widely-reported figures and tried to understand what they are telling us
‘Stupid Trump’!
Now let’s look at the question of whether they’re for us or against us from another angle.
One of the many ‘ludicrous’ claims made by democratically-elected US President Donald Trump during his election campaign was that there were more British Moozerlums fighting for ISIS than there were in the British armed forces.
Oh how the lefty libtards laughed at this preposterous assertion. Oh how they blasted Trump with their contemptuous, holier-than-thou scorn and their accusations of waaaccciiiissssmm.
But was Trump actually wrong? Let’s find out.
Even the BBC admits that around the time of Trump’s statement there were about 850 ‘British’ Moozerlums that had joined ISIL in order to try to kill those they considered enemies of Izlum and destroy Western civilisation. So, if the Burkha Broadcasting Corporation admits there were about 850, the real figure was probably a lot higher with some estimates suggesting it could be over 1,500. But let’s stick with the BBC’s very modest figure of 850.
Now what about the number of Moozerlums in the British armed forces? Here are the latest figures I could find:
Apologies that these are a bit difficult to read. But they show that there were about 650 Moozerlums signed up to defend our freedoms – 40 in the Navy, 560 in the Army and 50 in the RAF.
Hopefully readers will have noticed that the 650 ‘British’ Moozerlums in the British armed forces is less than the 850 ‘British’ Moozerlums fighting with ISIL.
So, let’s draw two quick conclusions:
Trump was right – there were more ‘British’ Moozerlums fighting for ISIL trying to destroy our civilisation than there were in the British military prepared to fight to defend our civilisation
While Moozerlums make up about 5% of the British population, they only make up about 0.4% of the British military. Our Moozerlum friends seem less than enthusiastic about defending the freedoms they enjoy in our country
The figures used in today’s blog are the best available figures. These are official figures. These are not figures made up by a sad, hate-filled waaccciiiisssttt.
I’ll leave it to my readers to decide what these figures are telling us about today’s multi-cultural Britain and the wisdom of our rulers enthusiastically encouraging hundreds of thousands more good folk from the world’s greatest religion to flood into our country every year.
Here’s a review a reader recently posted on amazon about my ‘latest’ book FORGET THE FOREPLAY:
If you like right-wing blogs written by bitter and paranoid old men, who think it’s funny to refer to refugees as “rapeugees” or “rapemigrants” and generally spend their retirement spitting bile at women, minorities, immigrants, and anybody who doesn’t look, think, and act exactly like them, AND you like outdated sexist jokes, then this book is for you. David Craig promised to close his blog if readers didn’t buy at least 50 copies of his disgusting book: they bought 12. Did he carry on spouting his usual invective against those less fortunate than himself? Of course he did. At this point, I think it’s the only thing keeping him alive.
The reviewer (who doesn’t appear to have even bought a copy of my “disgusting book“) gave me one star. I imagine that if they could have given me no stars, he or she would have done that.
But to quickly answer some of the reviewer’s points:
I’m not “right-wing” and have written GREED UNLIMITED which was just as critical of the Tories as my book SQUANDERED was of Blair’s New Labour
It’s my understanding that over 85% of the invading Third-World armies are not refugees but are parasitical, unemployable, low-IQ, violent, mostly male, economic gimmegrants and are from countries that are not at war and that the countries which have taken in these people have seen a massive increase in crime, particularly rape
As for my “outdated sexist jokes” – FORGET THE FOREPLAY was written about 30 years ago in just a few weeks. I only came across the file recently and, as I thought it was mildly amusing and as a friend from long ago had drawn a great cartoon for the front cover, I thought I might as well publish the book
And as for “closing my blog” – yes I have been regularly insulting the 98.8% of readers who are too tight-fisted to show support for my website by buying a copy of FORGET THE FOREPLAY (you don’t have to read the book! just buy it!) but in spite of my insults some readers just won’t go away
And finally I believe some of my books like THE GREAT CHARITY SCANDAL, DON’T BUY IT!, THE GREAT EUROPEAN RIP-OFF, SQUANDERED etc are actually quite well-researched, well-written and have made a genuine contribution. But what I don’t understand is why would someone, who obviously loathes me and my work, keeps on reading my blog and even pretends to review FORGET THE FOREPLAY? Hasn’t the person better things to do with their life?
Just a few isolated incidents?
What have the following 22 countries got in common?
Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, USA, Nigeria, Egypt, Afghanistan, France, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Philippines, Cameroon, Somalia, Mali, India, Belgium, Thailand, Niger, Austria, Kenya.
What these 22 countries have in common is that during just the last 30 days in every one of them innocent people were injured and killed in the name of religion and all these victims were victims of just one religion. And that religion wasn’t Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Catholicism, Zoroastrianism, Catholicism, Judaism or Trekkieism.
During the last 30 days in these 22 countries there were at least 130 religiously-inspired attacks, killing at least 982 innocents and injuring a further 1,014. But if you just followed the mainstream Western media, you’d have no idea of how widespread and deadly religiously-inspired violence was.
Moreover, on the few occasions when we do hear of an attack, our leaders assure as that we have nothing to fear from the religion responsible for these 130 attacks and deny that we are drifting towards a Third World War between civilisation and you know who.
Of course, the majority of adherents from the Religion of Love are peaceful. But here’s probably one of the most powerful short videos explaining why it doesn’t matter if the majority are peaceful because a minority can still cause the slaughter of tens of millions – history has shown that “the peaceful majority are irrelevant”:
In a 1993 article in Foreign Affairs magazine titled “The Clash of Civilisations?” the author, Samuel Huntington, apparently wrote “Isl*m has bloody borders”. What he was referring to was the apparent inability of the followers of our favourite religion to live in peaceful co-existence with the followers of other religions and those who didn’t follow any religion.
But is there any evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders? No, there is none at all!!!!! It’s just waaaccciiiisssstttt nonsense!!!
Catholics: Well yes, of course, Moozerlums in the Philippines are constantly fighting Catholics there and there is a full-scale Moozerlum uprising on one island. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” Catholics. Apart from that there is absolutely no evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders.
Buddhists: Yes, I know there is on-going violence between Moozerlums and Buddhists in Thailand and Myanmar and that thousands of innocents have been slaughtered. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” Buddhists? Apart from that there is absolutely no evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders.
Hindus: And of course, millions have been massacred and hundreds are still being killed in violence between Moozerlums and Hindus in India and Pakistan. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” Hindus? Apart from that there is absolutely no evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders.
Armenian Christians: Ok, ok. Yes, about one and a half million Armenian Christians were slaughtered by Turkish Moozerlums in the Armenian genocide. But surely that was the fault of the “nasty” Armenians?
Jews: And, of course, any right-thinking Moozerlum wants to wipe out the Jews who are referred to in the Great Book as like “apes and pigs”. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” Jews? Apart from that there is absolutely no evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders.
Coptic Christians: meanwhile in Egypt the persecution and murder of the country’s 7 million Coptic Christians seems to be some kind of national sport. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” Coptic Christians? Apart from that there is absolutely no evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders.
African Christians: Yup, there are a few small problems in Africa where Christians are being murdered in their thousands every year by followers of the Religion of Tolerance and Peace. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” African Christians?
West Europeans: And we all know about the never-ending series of Jihadi attacks throughout Europe targeting civilised West Europeans. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” West Europeans and their horrible, unfounded Izerlumophobia? Apart from that there is absolutely no evidence that Izerlum has bloody borders
Other Moozerlums: But most of the people being murdered by Moozerlums are, in fact, other Moozerlums. But surely that’s the fault of the “nasty” other Moozerlums who are not sufficiently Moozerlumic?
So, there you have it folks. There is absolutely no proof that Izerlum has bloody borders. Any violence and bloodshed is clearly the fault of Catholics, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Coptic Christians, African Christians, West Europeans and Moozerlums who are insufficiently Moozerlumic.
(This weekend I got a message from YouTube deleting one of my videos for “waacciissssmm” because I dared criticised the world’s favourite and most peaceful religion. I also got a warning that my account would be suspended if I continued to make “waaacccciiiisssstttt” videos. Free speech, anyone?)
Slightly along the same lines – I bet you never thought you’d have to watch Polish TV to find out what is happening in your own country.
Some people believe that British TV news has become the biased, propaganda tool of the ruling elites who want to eradicate national identities and destroy Western civilisation by flooding Europe with violent, intolerant, often inbred, low-IQ, unemployable Third-World detritus.
So, where can you find anything approaching the truth about what is happening to our society?
Perhaps surprisingly, Polish TV news might be a good place.
This short clip has subtitles. I’ll let it speak for itself. It tells a very different story to the Burkha Broadcasting Corporation and Jon Snow’s Channel 4 “F-ck the Tories” News.
Some people might think we should weep for the death of our once great country and civilisation and pray that Donald Trump and the East Europeans can save us from our civilisational suicide.
I’ll let you decide whether British or Polish TV news gives the most truthful view about the most important story of our times:
(Weekend blog) Here’s a story you’ll never see in the mainstream media. Why not? Because the mainstream media is only interested in trying to ridicule democratically-elected US President Donald Trump. All the media want is bad news stories suggesting Trump is either an idiot or a traitor. None of the mainstream media will ever give Trump credit for anything.
As for our rulers, they must really loathe democratically-elected US President Donald Trump. Why? Because Trump is doing something no other political leader ever does – he is trying, as best he can, to fulfill the promises he made during his election campaign.
Trump’s promise
One of Trump’s promises was to do more to protect Christians being persecuted and murdered in Moozerlum countries
Although Christians are one of the most persecuted minorities in the Middle East, the (IMHO) treacherous, West-loathing, self-serving, Moozerlum scumbag Obama made sure that the vast majority of ‘refugees into the USA were Moozerlums.
In 2015, under Hussein Obama, the US accepted 5,435 Moozerlum ‘refugees’ from Syria and only 28 Christians (o.5%) yet Christians used to make up about 10% of the Syrian population.
In the first few months of 2016, of the 2,099 Syrian refugees admitted to the USA, 6 were Christians (0.28%) and 2,043 (97.3%) were Sunni Moozerlums. The remaining 50 were 17 (0.8%) Shi’a, 30 (1.4%) other Moozerlums and 10 (0.47%) were the horrifically persecuted (by Sunni Moozerlums) Yazidis.
Now let’s look at what has happened under President Trump: In Trump’s first 6 months in office (January 21 to June 30) 9,598 Christian refugees arrived in the US compared with 7,250 Moozerlums. Under Obama, Christians were less than 1% of refugees coming to America and Moozerlums were over 98% of new arrivals. Under Trump, Christians made up about 50% of refugees, Moozerlums 38% and around 12% either belonged to other religions or had no religious affiliation:
Moreover, the percentage Christians has been increasing every month under Trump.
Below is a link to a short video in which Trump promises to increase the number of Christian refugees allowed into the USA. It look like President Trump has delivered on yet another of his promises. That will have the Trump-hating, West-loathing, Christian-despising, treacherous, rapemigrant-loving, lefty libtards choking on their ecological yoghurt.
Britanistan?
Oh, and before I go, I thought my tight-fisted readers who refuse to support this website by buying any of my books might enjoy these two photos of female newsreaders – one from British Channel 4 News and one from Syrian TV news. Can you spot the difference?
I wonder what this is telling us about the Moozerlumification of our once great country?
Anyway, here’s Trump’s promise – yet another promise he has kept:
As anti-Russia hysteria dominates everything that happens in Washington, ordinary people might wonder why Christian, semi-democratic Russia is always being cast as the villain and our enemy.
Ted Cruz, former Republican presidential hopeful, has claimed: “Russia is a significant adversary. Putin is a KGB thug”. What Trump-hating Mad John McCain believes is unprintable. And for Hillary Clinton running mate Tim Kaine, the revelation that Donald Trump Jr., entertained an offer from the Russians for dirt on Clinton could be considered “treason”.
Treason is giving aid and comfort to an enemy in a time of war. But are we really at war with Russia? Is Russia really our enemy?
If Putin is a “thug”, what about our NATO ally President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey? Or our Arab ally Gen. Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi of Egypt? Or our Philippine ally Rodrigo “Death Squad” Duterte? Or our friends who run oil-rich Saudi Arabia?
Were US Cold War allies like the Shah of Iran and Gen. Augusto Pinochet of Chile all Nobel-prize-winning democrats?
Meanwhile in China, China’s lone Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Liu Xiaobo, sentenced to 11 years in prison for championing democracy, died Thursday of liver cancer after Beijing refused to let him travel abroad for treatment. Chinese Communist dictator Xi Jinping and his best chum Korean mass murderer – FatBoy with a bad haircut – make Putin look like Justin Trudeau.
Yet hostility to Russia and hatred of Putin seem to exceed anything some of us remember from the worst days of the Cold War.
Putin’s Russia is called imperialist, though Estonia, next door, which Russia could swallow in one gulp, has been free for 25 years. Russia invaded Georgia. Well, yes, after Georgia invaded the seceded province of South Ossetia and killed Russian peacekeepers. Russia has taken back Crimea from Ukraine. True, but only after a US-backed coup in Kiev replaced the elected pro-Russian regime.
And as for Syria, Russia has intervened to back Bashar Assad in Syria. But only after US insurgent allies collaborated with al-Qaida and ISIS to bring him down. Is Russia not allowed to support an ally, recognized by the U.N., which provides its only naval base on the Med?
The Russophobes claim Russia has meddled in the US election. But you’d need quite a lot of fingers to count the number of countries where the US has forced regime change. And NATO keeps moving its missiles and armed forces ever closer to Russia’s borders in a crazed attempt to provoke Russia and thus paint Russia as our enemy,
This is madness!
Putin is not Pope Francis. But he is not Stalin or Hitler or Mao. In fact Putin has often called on the West to work together with Russia to prevent the Izlumic destruction of Western civilisation.
So, tight-fisted readers, don’t believe the ludicrously false propaganda war against Russia. We all know who our real enemy is. And it’s not Russia in spite of our rulers desperately and dishonestly trying to make out that Russia is a threat.
David Craig, on July 25th, 2017
