Yesterday I made two horrific discoveries. I’m “cisgender” (also known as “cis”) and I’m also “heteronormative”. In these times of gender fluidity, transgenderism, self-defining and LGBTblah blah blah, to be both cisgender and heteronormative is apparently a total disaster.
What? Didn’t you know what “cisgender” and “heteronormative” mean? OMG! OMG! OMFG! How prehistoric you must be! A cisgender person is someone who believes that they are the gender which they were born with. So, if they’ve got a dick, they believe they are male and if they’ve got one of these:
then they believe they are female. Yup, there really are still throwbacks like myself who identify with the gender they were born with.
As for being “heteronormative” – a “heteronormative” person is a kind of homphobic, transophobic, lesbophobic sexual fascist who ludicrously assumes that it is normal for males and females to be in a relationship and that gay couples, trans couples, lesbo couples, bi-couples and all such other permutations are not totally biologically normal.
I found a great (for “great” read “utterly laughable”) article in the lefty libtard Huffington Post where one of these sexually-fluid creatures bleats about how awful it is when a heteronormative person assumes you are cisgendered. Here’s just a very short extract:
You are imposing your concept of those things onto me, enforcing a binary that is paradoxical. Moreover, you are denying the gender fluidity of those who have a penis and identify as male, but prefer women’s underwear or wear makeup or transgress norms in innumerable other ways. Adding more labels — like “cisgendered male transvestite” — in order to justify your act of aggression defeats the purpose of simplifying things with words like “cisgendered.”
What is perhaps most disturbing in being called “cisgendered,” is that it imposes an identity on me. Doing so invalidates my complicated experience of gender. Don’t tell me that I am somehow normatively gendered for my body when my life experience has led me through periods of deep confusion about my gender identity and living as gender queer. How is living gender queer normative? How does that reconcile with the sex and gender roles society associates with having a penis? Moreover, you don’t get to make a reductive statement about my gender identity or how I embody my gender while trying to argue for recognition of the diversity of other peoples’ embodied genders. If you are going to argue for a less simplistic reading of others’ embodied genders, than you have to do so with mine too. That includes recognizing that as a queer person, I’m automatically not inhabiting the normative roles society has constructed for those with a penis. My behavior, and sexual and romantic attachments aren’t normative for “men.” My intuitiveness isn’t normative. My choices of profession haven’t been normative. My mode of speech isn’t normative.
By imposing the label “cisgendered” onto me, you do me psychological and intellectual violence.
And here’s a very brief video explaining how devastating it can be when a heteronormative person treats you as …….
Sorry, I’m stopping now – there’s only so much politically-correct total bollox one can write in a day:
Was watching a football match last night. So, no time to research a blog.
But as Merkel (eagerly supported by all the quisling, West-hating, Izlumophiliac West-European leaders) squirms and writhes as she desperately tries to hang on to power in Europe’s Fourth Reich (also sometimes misleadingly called “the European Union”) here’s a real European from the Alternativ fur Deutschland saying what almost nobody else would dare say.
When I write “real European”, I mean someone who values European culture and civilisation and who doesn’t want our continent to be destroyed by an invading army of often illiterate, often intolerant, often low-IQ, often inbred, often violent, usually unemployable, often rape-obsessed Third-World garbage.
I wonder if the (IMHO) treacherous mainstream-media libtards like Emily Maitlis or Catherine Newman or Krishnan Double-Barreled or Jon “F*ck-the -Tories” Snow, who only manages to stand out from the grey studio wallpaper by wearing colourful socks and ties, will be rushing to interview this guy?
When being interviewed by the always biased BBC or the (IMHO) self-important, virtue-signalling, brainless lefty libtards on C4 News, our cowardly, West-hating, globalist politicians always grovel and squirm to show how politically-correct they are.
After all, even the slightest deviation from the media-accepted level of political correctness would result in them being called “racists”, “homophobes”, “Izlumophobes”, “transophobes”, “ageists”, “fascists” and of course, “Hitlers”. And the slightest deviation from political correctness would also lead to their reputations and careers being destroyed.
Thankfully, those who lead countries like Poland and Hungary are proud of their countries and their traditions and aren’t cowed by the likes of Cathy Newman, Kristen Guru-Something, Emily Maitlis or Jon “F*ck-the-Tories” Snow with his colourful ties and socks rather pathetically (IMHO) showing what a unique individual he is.
Thankfully, politicians from countries like Poland and Hungary are prepared to tell our holier-than-thou, rapefugee-loving interviewers to “go get stuffed!”
Here’s a “go get stuffed!” to C4’s Kathy Newman from Poland:
And here’s a “go get stuffed” to the BBC’s Emily Maitlis from Hungary:
This weekend loads of lefty deadbrains were taking part in protests against democratically-elected US President Donald Trump’s supposedly ‘brutal’ and ‘inhumane’ clampdown on illegal immigration. In particular they lambasted Trump for separating illegal migrants’ children from their parents even though:
this policy was intended to avoid the children being incarcerated with their parents
this policy had been in place under Saint Obama
the hated Trump actually stopped this policy when he heard about it
But the lefties and the progressive, liberal mainstream media never let the facts get in the way of a good story about the West’s supposedly inhumane treatment of poor innocent migrants
Monster lefty lies – Aylan Kurdi
You might remember Aylan Kurdi.
Aylan Kurdi was a three-year-old Syrian boy whose image made global headlines after he drowned on 2 September 2015 in the Mediterranean Sea. He and his family were supposedly Syrian refugees trying to reach Europe. Photographs of his body quickly spread around the world forcing European leaders to admit over a million supposed ‘refugees’.
Later we learned that the family had repeatedly applied for asylum in liberal, Izlumophiliac, metrosexual Justin Trudeau’s ultra-liberal Canada and been refused. If ultra-liberal Canada didn’t want this family, then there must have been something badly wrong with them.
Then we found out the family had actually been living for a couple of years in safe Turkey. But the father, understandably, rather fancied a better life in Europe. I’m sure the fact that the family could receive more in benefits in Europe than the father could earn by working in Turkey had absolutely nothing to do with this decision.
Then even more worrying issues emerged. Alan Kurdi’s father, Abdullah Kurdi, stated in some of his interviews that the inflatable boat became uncontrollable as its engine had failed, with the ‘captain’ abandoning it and everyone else.
However, an Iraqi survivor from the same boat, Zainab Abbas, who also lost two children from the disaster, told reporters that Abdullah had been presented to her as the ‘captain’, that he was driving the overcrowded boat too fast, causing it to flip over, and that he pleaded with her while they were still both in the water not to report him to anyone in authority. The Reuters agency reported that interviews with two other passengers in the boat, Iraqis Ahmed Hadi Jawwad (Zainab Abbas’s husband), and 22-year-old Amir Haider, corroborated Abbas’s account.
While the initial story about Aylan Kurdi’s death received massive coverage in the mainstream media, the more unsettling facts about the father’s role in his son’s death were not quite so widely reported.
Monster lefty lies – US child separations
And now it appears the mainstream media have fed us the same diet of biased lefty lies about the US child separations.
Maybe this short video tells us something closer to the truth?
Hopefully you’ll have seen the wonderful news. Allah be praised – by the next census (2021) white Brits will be a minority in Birminghamistan.
British white people are soon to become the minority in Birmingham while nearly 50,000 residents in the city cannot speak English, according to a new report.
There are thought to be residents from nearly 200 countries living in Birmingham which has been described as ‘super diverse’ in the city council’s new cohesion strategy.
Sadiq Khan’s Third-World criminal hell-hole, London, is already “superdiverse” (or even “ultra-superdiverse”) as only about one in three ‘Londoners’ is white ethnic British. Though there is clearly no connection at all between London’s “superdiversity” and London’s soaring violent crime rate!!!!!!!!!
A local Birminghamistan newspaper admits that this fantastic news about the city’s “superdiversity” can be seen from two different angles: “But while there are recognised benefits to a multi-cultural society such as trade links, the city’s varied ethnicity has also been identified as major factor in social segregation and community ‘tension’.”
42.1% of people in Birmingham classified themselves as non-white British in the 2011 census. That was an increase of 12% from the 2001 survey and if the rate continues by the time of the next census in 2021 more than half of the city’s 1.2 million-plus population will be from an ethnic minority.
This is already the case for under 18s with 60% coming from a non-white British background in the last poll. Birmingham is soon to become what’s called “a majority minority city” or “superdiverse”
The newspaper admits this “superdiversity” can cause some problems such as in employment where Birmingham’s rates are languishing way below the national average – “65% of working age residents in jobs compared to the national average of 74% in 2016. This is not helped by the fact that high numbers of Pakistani and Bangladeshi residents have no qualifications, while at least 47,005 citizens are unable to speak English”.
(It might be interesting to compare employment rates between different communities – Sikhs, Chinese and Followers of the Religion of Peace and Prosperity. However, I doubt our rulers will ever allow us to see those figures)
But the newspaper highlights the many benefits of “superdiversity” – “Ethnic diversity can bring many benefits such as transnational trading links and high levels of cultural resource. Birmingham has benefited from its diverse migrant communities who have settled in the city and successfully contributed to its economic vitality, becoming leaders in education, medicine, sports, arts and business and providing employment opportunities to local people”.
So, let us welcome Birminghamistan’s “superdiversity”!
Let us welcome our once great country’s future!
2. Discussing with a progressive libtard
And here, to cheer us all up as many more of our cities and towns spiral downwards towards the Third-World hell that is “superdiversity”, is a polite young man trying to have a discussion with the most intelligent progressive liberal he could find:
I’m taking it easy again today and using another of the short videos recommended by a reader. (I’ll probably go back to more serious stuff at the weekend)
Today’s video is about beauty contests. The progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling libtards are demanding that beauty contests should be more diverse and inclusive and less patriarchal and less sexist and blah blah blah blah.
After all, why should pulchritudinally- and gravitationally-challenged women not be allowed to win beauty contests?
That’s discrimination against these lovely creatures who have just chosen to be themselves rather than to cravenly conform to some patriarchal, male-imposed, unachievable image of what a beauty contest winner should look like:
In fact, why shouldn’t six-foot-five hirsute, heavily tattooed, bearded men with lumberjack muscles and legs like tree trunks not be allowed to win beauty contests if they decide to self-identify as women/girls on the day of the competition? It’s discrimination, right?
And what about gravitationally-challenged men?
Shouldn’t they also be allowed to win the Miss World contest? After all, it might lower their self-esteem if they’re not allowed to win the Miss World contest. (By the way, that’s not me in the photo – well, at least not quite yet)
In fact, I’m thinking of buying a burkha, entering the Miss Great Britain contest and then suing for “Izlumophobia” if I don’t win.
I agree with the looney libtards – beauty contests should be open to all, regardless of looks, age, sex or attractiveness.
I stand up for oppressed majorities – anyone should be able to win a beauty contest.
Anyway, here’s the organiser of the Miss America contest explaining that participants will now be judged on their “social impact initiatives” rather than their physical beauty. Good grief!
I’m sorry. I hate myself for my antediluvian views. But I found this video, sent by a reader, funny. What a horrible person I am – so politically-incorrect, so unlibtardian.
If I hate myself for my politically-incorrect views, would that be a ‘hate crime’? Should I go and report myself to my local plod for hate thoughts?
Anyway here’s the video – Does feminism make you ugly?
Yesterday I listed some famous (IMHO) progressive libtards – Gary Lineker and Bono and Saint Bob Geldorf and JK Rowling and Lily Allen and George and Amal Clooney and others of their ilk. One reader made a comment about them being “do-gooders”. But the problem is that they are (as far as I know) NOT “do-gooders”. They are (IMHO) holier-than-thou virtue-signallers. They tell us how we should behave, how we should welcome rapemigrants into our country and homes, how we should give ever more of our hard-earned and heavily-taxed money to corrupt Third-World sh*tholes. But they generally absolutely do not practice what they preach.
Mr Bono, for example, is possibly as well known for his smart tax avoidance tricks as he is for his music. And Mr Lineker was recently handed a rather large tax bill following his involvement in a scheme which HMRC considered deliberate tax avoidance. But perhaps multi-millionaires Mr Bono and Mr Lineker weren’t aware that the money to support rapemigrants and to give to Third-World kleptocrats comes from the taxes we pay and money our government borrows. Were those like Mr Bono and Mr Lineker to pay their taxes, there would be more money for the causes they so frequently preach to us about.
As for the others in my list, I rather suspect that they also have rather smart tax advisers to help them avoid the taxes the rest of us have to pay. After all, taxes are just for “little people”.
Moreover, when it comes to welcoming rapemigrants, I imagine all of our most vociferous virtue-signallers live in well-protected mansions without a rapemigrant in sight. They’re not the ones who will get mugged in the street by moped robbers, whose children will be gang-raped, gang-sodomised and forced into prostitution or who will forced out of their homes as their neighbourhoods are increasingly turned into crime-ridden Third-World ghettoes.
Well-protected from the reality the rest of us have to endure, the virtue-signallers can preach to us from the safety of their security-guarded existences.
How civilisations die
Each civilisation assumes its own immortality. Yet each civilisation grows, gains power, develops becomes decadent, loses its moral courage and dies. In Western Europe’s case, we have become apathetic, decadent and don’t have the moral courage to defend our civilisation from a hostile invading army of violent, intolerant, backward, largely illiterate, largely unemployable, often criminal people who hate us and want to destroy everything our forefathers (and foremothers, of course) have built up for us.
The shortish (6 minutes) video below isn’t the best I’ve seen because it doesn’t clearly present the reason why Western Europe will collapse – the migrant invasion and us white Europeans becoming minorities in our own countries. But the video still encapsulates how our obsession with superficial pleasures and our lack of moral courage means we are heading to our own destruction.
Only Donald Trump and the East European countries – Hungary, Poland, Austria etc – who still value what our civilisation has given us, can save us from our own civilisational suicide:
Hopefully today’s blog will help braindead, liberal, progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling libtards to understand some basic geography.
Dear lefties, here’s a simplified map of part of the Med – the part where the main migrant armies from Africa pour into Europe:
What can you see? You can see that Europe (Italy and Malta) are rather far from the Libyan coast and Tunisia is much nearer. In fact, the Tunisian port of Zarzis is only about 60 miles from the Libyan beaches where the supposed ‘charities’ have their ferries ready to transport the invading migrant armies almost 300 miles to Europe. So, really, shouldn’t the NGO ferries be taking the migrants to the nearest safe port – in Tunisia – instead of bringing them all the way to Europe?
Why will none of our rulers or the lying hypocrites at NGOs like Medecins Sans Frontieres answer this simple question?
Um, virtue-signallers Gary Lineker and Bono and Saint Bob Geldorf and JK Rowling and Lily Allen and all the others of your ilk, don’t you have an answer either? And, by the way, how many migrants have you all now taken into your many luxury homes?
History – Italy saves European civilisation
The Italians, when they were rough, tough Romans gave Europe much of its civilisation:
Then the Romans became Italians and, well, they became just a joke country for a thousand years or so. But now, much to the surprise of treacherous garbage like Merkel and Macron and The Drunk, the Italians are resurgent and, like Hungary, are rising up against their German-controlled EU overlords by refusing to let their country be over-run by any more backward, illiterate, violent, unemployable, Third-World hordes. It’s a wonderful sight. Italy is helping save European civilisation.
Oh, and perhaps the BBC and C4 News ‘forgot’ to mention that just over the last few days the Italians have forced NGO ‘rescuers’ to return over 1,000 invaders back to Libya. Our politically-correct mainstream media are quick to applaud when hundreds of thousands of supposed “refugees” are shipped at our expense from just a few miles off the Libyan beaches to Europe. But our media are stunningly silent when their beloved rapefugees are shipped straight back to Libya in case we politically-incorrect, ordinary people start applauding.
All of last week the mainstream media and the European ruling elites continued to spew out their loathing for Trump – this time for separating illegal migrant children from their parents.
As usual, the media and the virtue-signalling, holier-than-thou, progressive, hug-a-rapemigrant libtards forgot to mention the reason children were being separated from their parents – a US court ruling that prevented the US Government from incarcerating children with their parents while their illegal migrant parents’ cases for asylum were being dealt with.
Moreover, nobody complained when Saint O’Bummer was separating children from their parents. I just can’t imagine why not.
I wonder what excuse the mainstream media and the usual useful idiots will find to vomit their loathing for Trump this week?
Anyway back to the separated children, here’s the inimitable Paul Joseph Watson yet again exposing the lies and hypocrisy and Trump-hatred of the mainstream media and the ruling ever-so-liberal elites. The most revealing bit is where some tossers are shown photos of illegal migrant children in holding cages and they say this is just like German concentration camps – only to find out that these photos were taken when Mr all-talk-no-trousers O’Bummer was president. Oooops!
David Craig, on July 5th, 2018
