Below is an email I just received from Tommy Robinson. Are you prepared to support our soldiers by signing his petition?
A few days ago, I stopped at a service station where four coaches full of British soldiers were taking a break. I said hello to the lads and some of them posed for “selfies” with me.
It was my great honour to stand with our troops and shake their hands, even just for a few moments.
But when the Muslim Council of the UK heard about this, they immediately demanded that the Army punish these soldiers — and to their shame, the Army did.
These lads had their cell phones seized and inspected for “illegal” photos of me. And the Armed Forces’ official Islamic advisor, Asim Hafiz, condemned these men — before the investigation was even complete — telling reporters that “any form of racism, discrimination or extremism is taken extremely seriously and will be dealt with accordingly”.
What racism? What discrimination?
It was just a photo. These are proud British soldiers.
And now I have heard that at least one of these lads has been summarily discharged from the Army — just for standing next to me and smiling.
That’s outrageous. That cannot stand.
These lads are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for our freedoms. The least we can do is stand up for their freedom, too.
I’m going to go down to the Ministry of Defence and hand-deliver a petition to the Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir Nick Carter, demanding that this political witch-hunt be called off.
I started the petition last night, and it already has more than 70,000 names on it. Please take a moment to add your name to it, too — I’d like to have over 100,000 signatures on it by tomorrow.
For obvious legal reasons, I can’t write today’s blog. So, after a brief introduction, I’ll have to refer you to what a real journalist wrote yesterday.
This is Sir Craig Mackey – Acting Commissioner of the Met Police or something like that.
Look how many medals he has:
Impressive huh?
Also in the photo is Cressida Dickless, current head of the Met police. In fact, look at how many medals she has too. Phew, they must be very brave people.
Or maybe not?
Below is an article by a journalist from the Daily Telegraph yesterday giving her opinion on whether Sir Craig is a national hero, as his many medals would suggest, or just a fat, over-paid, over-pensioned, gutless, over-promoted, spineless, testicle-free coward.
I know what I think.
As for all the medals that Sir Craig and Cressida got, I wonder what they’re for? Political correctness above and beyond the call of duty? Encouraging diversity? Sitting in meetings? Sticking to Health and Safety rules? Libtardism? Trawling the Internet for supposed ‘hate speech’ and ‘hate thoughts’? Running away from danger? Who knows?
Here’s the article:
Cowards have always been with us. The difference today is that cowards feel no shame; no remorse for putting their own safety first when others are in peril. On the contrary. Take the despicable case of Sir Craig Mackey.
Henceforth, this column will refer to him as Mackey, not Sir Craig, because, as we shall see, this senior police officer has dishonoured his knighthood.
Mackey was the Metropolitan Police’s Acting Commissioner on the day, in March 2017, when the Islamist terrorist Khalid Masoodlaunched an attack on Westminster Bridge and the Palace of Westminster. Mackey had just left a ministerial meeting and was sitting in his official vehicle with his driver and chief-of-staff, when they witnessed the stabbing of PC Keith Palmer. He said his first instinct was to jump out and help, but an assistant locked the car doors because they had nothing with which to stop the terrorist.
Mackey told the official inquiry that his instinct to leave the vehicle was “not the right response. I was in shirtsleeves, with no radio, I didn’t know if the attack was ongoing . . . we had no protective equipment at all, no communications. . . two colleagues with me who were quite traumatised by what they had seen, so we moved out and I began co-ordinating the response”.
Right, let’s unpack that sorry excuse for an apology, shall we?
Keith Palmer had nothing with which to stop the terrorist. That didn’t stop PC Palmer putting his body, and mighty heart, between the knife-wielding nutter and innocent members of the public. He bought time so that others could be safe.
As for driving away to “co-ordinate the response” (formerly known as fleeing), here’s an idea: how about the most senior police officer in the land fetches a jack or fire extinguisher from the boot of his official car and leads the charge against Masood with his two colleagues? Oh, sorry, I forgot, they were “quite traumatised”. Poor things.
In case you’re not up to Maximum Incredulity yet, here is the exact exchange between Hugo Keith, barrister for the Met, and Mackey.
Keith: “It may seem obvious that had you not locked the car and had you got out, you would have presented yourself as a further target?”
Mackey: “Yes, anyone who got in his way would have been a target. Anyone who came up against that individual would have faced serious, serious injury if not death.”
I’m sure that Craig Mackey’s behaviour was completely in line with modern policing Health and Safety guidelines. Sadly, it just doesn’t happen to coincide with the courageous common sense the public still expects of its police officers.
Compare and contrast with PC Wayne Marques, who singlehandedly took on three jihadists at London Bridge, armed only with his baton. Despite being blinded in one eye, stabbed in the hand and with a knife in his leg, PC Marques continued to use what he believed might be his dying breath in the performance of his duty. Strangely, he didn’t worry about “presenting himself as another target”.
Compare also with Superintendent Gerry Richardson of Lancashire Police, who laid down his life tackling an armed robber in 1971. His murderer, Fred Sewell, said of Supt Richardson at his trial: “I shall see him every day of my life. He just kept coming. He was too brave.”
How the hell did we get from conspicuous valour to moral squalor in 40 years? Police selection processesses, it seems, have become increasingly politicised and biased against men and women with character and guts. “The top brass don’t have the balls to actually fight crime, they would rather have meetings and arrest online name-callers,” despaired one recently retired policeman in an online post.
Sounds about right, doesn’t it? What example does the spineless Mackey set to junior colleagues, who must daily patrol our streets and tackle knife crime? Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer my police officers running towards danger, not cowering behind a rulebook which says that tackling a terrorist when you lack a radio or a weapon is “not the right response”.
It bloody well is the right response. And we must fear for public safety, and the reputation of the force, if the police are being taught that their bravest and truest instinct is false.
Most troubling of all, perhaps, is the fact that Mackey experienced no discomfort when his cowardice was made public. Clearly, he sees no shame in failing to rush to Pc Palmer’s aid. But shame it was; shame it is. Shame is an important emotion, because it tells someone they have fallen well short of what was expected of them.
I have a message for Craig Mackey: you are no Sir, mister. You should stand down immediately and let your knighthood, for services to the police, be handed to someone who deserves it. We recognise that person, for their courage is unforgettable: “I shall see him every day of my life. He just kept coming. He was too brave.”
Massive yawn. Here we go again. The bunch of supposed ‘scientists’ on the totally discredited IPCC have yet again warned us that we only have 10 years to save the Earth from catastrophic Climate Change. Not only have they been having multiple, knicker-drenching orgasms at the BBC and C4 News, but even supposedly respectable newspapers like the Times have been taking the latest IPCC ‘warning, panic’ report seriously.
There are so many reasons why the latest IPCC report is only useful as toilet paper that I couldn’t possibly list them all here. But let’s just deal with a few:
The climate changes – the Earth’s climate changes, has always changed and will always change. Of course, Climate Change is real. But to claim that humans can adjust the Earth’s temperature like adjusting a radiator is totally spurious
Hot, cold, hot, cold – In the 1950s we were warned of climate catastrophe due to rapidly melting ice caps. Didn’t happen. In the 1970s we were warned about climate catastrophe due to a supposed new Ice Age which would lead to massive crop failures and millions dying from starvation. Didn’t happen. In 1989/90 we were warned about climate catastrophe due to supposed Man-Made Global Warming (AGW). The Himalayan glaciers and much of the polar ice caps were to have melted by the year 2000. Didn’t happen.
Ten years left so save the planet – If I remember correctly, it was around the year 2000 that we were told we had “only 100 months left to save the planet from AGW”. I guess that means most of us should have died from AGW around 2010. Didn’t happen. In fact, every ten or so years we’re told we only have 10 or 7 or whatever years left to save the planet and the predicted climate catastrophe never happens
Is CO2 a ‘Greenhouse Gas”? – we’re constantly told that the process leading to our destruction is due to CO2 being a Greenhouse Gas. In fact, CO2 is a Greenhouse Gas in the sense that it improves plant growth and many large industrialised farming companies install CO2 generators in their greenhouses to improve crop yields. Here’s a Johnson CO2 generator designed for greenhouses
But what about increasing CO2? – the Warmies claim that increasing CO2 is leading to increasing temperatures. But are they confusing cause and effect? Could it be that increasing temperatures (due to natural variations in climate) are causing more CO2 to be released by the oceans and that massive deforestation means this CO2 is not being absorbed by trees?
The “97% of scientists” fraud – we’re repeatedly being told that 97% of scientists agree that Global Warming is due to human activity. But this is a totally fraudulent number. As I have explained previously, this figure was arrived at by reading the abstracts of articles (not the actual articles), removing from the sample all the articles where the writers didn’t take a position on the cause of Global Warming and then claiming that 97% supported the AGW theory. If you were intellectually honest and included all the articles in the sample, the real number who supported the AGW theory would be around a mere 8% – somewhat fewer than the “97%” claim
What about population? – the Warmies keep claiming that Global Warming is due to human activity. Therefore it follows that to control warming we should control the size of the human population. But this would be a crime against political correctness, so the Warmies never mention this. Yet more proof that the whole Warmie thing is a politically-motivated, biased, unscientific scam.
Then there were the leaked emails showing how ‘scientists’ had been fiddling the figures, the discredited ‘hockey stick’ diagram, the ships sent to show the polar ice caps were melting getting stuck in thick ice, the………… Oh God, I’m so bored of these Climate Change ‘warning, panic’ reports that I’ll let someone else explain why the whole thing is a massive fraud used by the ruling elites to increase their control over us:
First, I think we should congratulate the Americans. If our politicians had been confronted by the mouth-frothing, eyes-bulging, screaming, deranged mobs of progressive, brain-dead libtards opposing the Kavanaugh nomination, they would have caved in immediately. But American politicians are made of sterner stuff. They seem to have spines, unlike UK politicians.
As the (IMHO) over-ambitious, self-serving, (probably Soros-supported) piece of sh*t, Trump-loathing US lawyer Michael Avenatti started producing women with ever more absurd stories of Kavanaugh’s supposed ‘sex crimes’ and as the howling, screaming mobs spewed out their rage and bile urged on by Democrats and CNN, ABC News etc, US politicians held their nerve. Instead of abandoning Kavanaugh, they demanded due process be followed that Kavanaugh was innocent until proven guilty. The result – when ‘Dr’ Ford put on her well-practiced ‘baby’ voice when claiming her life had been totally destroyed by Kanavaugh even though her memory kept failing her as she ‘couldn’t remember’ anything except that Kavanaugh had allegedly fumbled around a bit trying to remove some of her clothes about 36 years ago, Republican senators realised her whole story was a crock and defied the mob by confirming Kavanaugh’s appointment to the US Supreme Court.
If only we had politicians like that in Britain!
Truth = crime
Now to the main subject of today’s blog. Something very odd has happened – the truth has become a criminal offence. We’re seeing this all over Europe:
UK – Tommy Robinson livestreams activity outside a criminal trial (just as the BBC and C4 News often do) and is rushed off to prison for supposedly committing a criminal offence. I have even had three useless plods visit me to warn me from writing anything that the ruling elites might disagree with
France – Marine Le Pen’s party is accused by a lefty journalist of being like ISIS. So Marine Le Pen tweets three photos of ISIS activity – someone being burnt alive in a cage and (if I remember correctly) a couple of beheadings – to point out that her party isn’t quite like ISIS. Former ISIS murderers are allowed back into France with no action taken against them while Marine Le Pen is sent to trial
Sweden – A 70-year-old Swedish woman was prosecuted for hate speech after claiming on Facebook she saw migrants defecating in the streets and setting fire to cars. According to the prosecution, the woman “expressed a disparaging view of refugees” on Facebook. Of course, no action is taken by the police against those who set fire to the cars.
And there are many more similar examples from all around Europe.
The process seems to be as follows:
some person or group does something that other people might find distasteful – first-cousin marriage, FGM, defecating in the street, setting fire to cars, mass uncontrolled immigration, rape, murder, beheading etc etc
some innocent person comments about what they saw, possibly even expressing concern
the person commenting is immediately found to be guilty of “inciting hostility” through racism, ageism, sexism, Izlumophobia, homophobia, transphobia and numerous other made-up -isms and supposed phobias that most of us have never heard of. No action is ever taken against those who have actually committed real criminal offences
It seems that the truth has become a crime. George Orwell would have been impressed at how accurate his predictions of our future have turned out to be.
Is democracy dead?
This seems to have happened because democracy has been replaced by a new elitist ruling class who cannot tolerate any criticism of their institutions and their policies. Twenty or even ten years ago, we still had the illusion of democracy as slightly left-of-centre parties competed in elections with slightly right-of-centre parties. But now our rulers have even given up the pretense of democracy.
For example, there used to be referendums in a few EU countries. But any country in the EU that voted the wrong way was told to vote again and again till they gave the ‘right’ answer, the answer German-controlled Brussels bureaucrats wanted. Or else, in 2005 when both France and Holland rejected the new EU constitution, the EU ruling elites just ignored the results and went ahead anyway.
With Brexit, the EU elites are determined to punish Britain and ensure that Brexit is a failure in case other countries might be tempted to break free of the asphyxiating stranglehold of the Brussels bureaucracy. And now that we have the election of eurosceptic and/or anti-immigration parties in Hungary, Italy, Austria and others, the EU is looking for ways to punish voters’ impertinence by threatening sanctions and withdrawal of funds and by taking away more power from countries – powers like border and budgetary control – so that nothing can stand in the way of the elites’ globalist policies.
I don’t normally recommended any videos longer than a few minutes. But here’s Mark Steyn giving his take on how the new ruling elites have destroyed the rule of law and democracy in order to cement their power over us.
I find he goes on too long and would be much more effective if he were brief and to the point like Pat Condell. But still, it’s probably worth listening to a few minutes of Steyn’s analysis:
It’s almost OK to murder Swedes if you’re a multi-cultural enricher
Sudanese/Egyptian Suleman Suleman seems to have been doing quite a bit of multi-cultural enriching since he arrived in Sweden.
In 2007 he was convicted for the first time – for car theft. Then a long series of crimes followed – 23 in total. Several crimes involved violence, for example, when he robbed and threatened to kill two young Swedes in Gothenburg in 2011.
On another occasion the same year, he and his friends assaulted a Swedish youth on the commuter train from Alingsås to Gothenburg. The brawl started when Suleman urinated on the floor in the train. The youth confronted him about it, and was severely beaten – with among other things a bottle to his head. These 23 crimes are just the crimes we know about. There are probably plenty of other violent incidents and possibly rapes that the dopey Swedish police haven’t detected.
But despite his continued crimes, Suleman has never ended up in prison. In several cases, the courts have judged that what was required instead was “an ambitious treatment” – which basically means probation with a special psychiatric and social-orientated treatment plan.
But Suleman Suleman’s “ambitious treatment” doesn’t seem to have worked all that well. He has finally been sent to prison for murdering a Swedish student who wouldn’t give him drugs free as our friend Suleman didn’t have any money to pay for the drugs. Suleman stabbed the student 13 times and then cut his throat:
But no problem, Swedish prisons are like holiday camps and anyway Suleman Suleman will be out in 11 years or less. Then, of course, he’ll be allowed to remain in Sweden as to throw him out would breach his human rights. So he can carry on enriching Sweden with his presence for the rest of his life.
In Germany, never bash a rapefugee
Here’s one lovely story of successful integration from Germany. At the Munich Hackerbrücke train station, a 28-year-old migrant from Eritrea grabbed a German woman under her skirt on Tuesday. When her father saw the sexual assault, he punched the African man in the face to make him stop.
An employee of the German railway company Deutsche Bahn, witnessed the incident and alerted federal police. The German police decided to file two charges: One against the migrant for sexual assault and one against the father for causing bodily harm. Yup, in Germany it’s now against the law to try to protect your own daughter from being sexually assaulted by one of Adolf Merkel’s migrant masses.
Where to get the truth? The BBC? Or Russian TV?
This hasn’t been a great week for Vladimir “Vlad the Impaler” Putin. Several members of the Moscow Church Tower Appreciation Society were exposed as being GRU agents trying to bug the HQ of the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons. I suspect that when Vlad the Impaler has finished debriefing his hapless agents, they’ll be joining their Salisbury-cathedral-admiring colleagues appreciating church towers in Siberia for the rest of their lives.
But here’s a story from Russian TV (RT) which tells us quite a bit about how Germany has been taken over by West-loathing, leftist, Izlumophiliac stooges.
During a Poetry Slam in Speyer, Ida-Marie Müller a 14-year-old girl and daughter of an Alternative for Germany (AfD) politician, dared to ridicule the German welcome culture of the left and denounce Muslim refugee rapists all in one. Her poem included the lines “From far away, the man, with a mobile phone but no passport, got to Europe with the help of human traffickers. He arrived in our hallowed German land, and because he couldn’t get a woman, he helped himself to one with a knife.”
Not only did she receive the most applause for her poem but would have won the competition because the winner was determined this way.
The left-wing organisers couldn’t have that, of course, and simply disqualified her, the obvious winner. She was barred from the award ceremony and another competitor was awarded first prize instead because a 14-year-old girl denouncing rape by people claiming to be asylum seekers is considered “Nazi propaganda.”
One of the city officials accused her of “Spiritual arson and fuelling fears”. Even the Mayor Monika Kabs(CDU) had to share her two cents on the event and accused Müller of using the Poetry Slam as a platform for the AfD.
Facebook banned Benajmin Haupt the District Association Chairman of the AfD for posting video of her in the competition. It didn’t stop there though. Their house was defaced by vandals spray-painting “Nazi” and “F*ck AfD” on the walls.
Our ‘truth-loving’ BBC reported the story using the more than slightly provocative headline: “Girl’s racist poem sparks row in southwestern Germany”.
Russian TV (RT) gave a much more balanced report of the story:
I could use today’s blog to write about the latest brutal slaughters around the world carried out by our favourite religion in the name of peace. Or I could write about how the German city of Cologne – once famous for the largest mass rape of European females by migrants – is now home to the largest mosque in Germany.
Or I could move closer to home and write about how Uber driver Rahman Ullah from our favourite religion treated his ex-wife.
Here’s Rahman the multi-cultural enricher:
Rahman has been jailed after livestreaming himself punching his wife and hitting her with a shoe while saying ‘I’m going to kill her today’. Uber driver Rahman Ullah, 38, hit his wife Raja, 34, with the heel of his shoe until she was left with two black eyes in the video streamed to relatives in Pakistan. He held on to a kitchen knife throughout the attack and mimicked stabbing her with it during the brutal assault at their home in, Croydon, south London, on May 9.
But as it’s Friday, I thought it might be time to lighten up and write about the weather
Weather = global catastrophe?
Apparently in the US they have at least one Weather Channel. It sounds rather boring, but I guess all the Weather Channel does is broadcast the weather. But fear not, with Global Warming or Climate Change (or whatever it’s called this week) bringing total catastrophe to mankind, the Weather Channel has plenty of shock horror stories to peddle to its viewers.
But sometimes, it seems that the Weather Channel exaggerates ever so slightly. I imagine this is both to attract viewers and to convince us about the seriousness of GlobalClimateWarmingChange.
Last week, I included a Weather Channel report where the broadcaster was caught pretending a storm was a few thousands times worse than it was in reality. Unfortunately for the broadcaster, the people wearing shorts wandering calmly by in the background exposed the presenter’s lies.
Anyway, here’s another presenter this time almost drowning in flood waters. Again, it’s the good, ordinary folk in the background, most once again wearing shorts, who unwittingly expose the fact that the presenter is talking total unadulterated bollox:
And here are some people who don’t take the Weather Channel’s apocalyptic broadcasts quite as seriously as the Weather Channel perhaps would like:
As we all know, Africa is a complete hell-hole and pretty much all African countries are corrupt, worthless, impoverished sh*tholes. Moreover, in spite of the $250bn in development aid money that has been given to Africa since the mid-1960s, there are still not many signs of all the water wells and roads and hospitals and electricity plants and schools and suchlike that we in the West have paid for many times over. Yet most of Africa’s rulers have become billionaires.
Waacissts have suggested that the main reason for Africa’s failure to grow is the low IQ of its citizens. Furthermore such horrible people have suggested there is a link between a country’s average IQ and its economic success:
But, of course, political correctness prevents any discussion of this.
However one aspect of Africa is seeing growth – the African population:
And where are all these new Africans going to live? Well, they can’t live in their own poverty-stricken excrement-covered, sewer-countries. So, naturally they’ll be headed for Europe:
And they’ll be bringing with them all their wonderful practices which I dare not mention here.
(The Religion of) Peace comes to Mozambique
Like me, you probably don’t know where Mozambique is. And like me, you probably don’t care:
Anyway, Peace has recently come to Mozambique. Unfortunately this “Peace” is not real peace, it’s the Religion of Peace.
Mozambique gained independence from Portugal in 1975 and then had the usual African civil war. In Mozambique this civil war lasted from pretty much the day after independence till 1992. Obviously, a 16-year civil war isn’t great for economic development and more than half of Mozambique’s 24 million people continue to live below the poverty line.
But do not despair. The future for Mozambique looks bright. The discovery of gas fields off Mozambique’s coast in 2011 is set to transform the economy of one of Africa’s poorest nations.
At least, that was the situation until October 2017 when the first Izlumist attacks started with a raid on a police station and a military outpost. Over the last year, more than 50 people have been killed in gun, grenade and knife assaults in the growing jihadist insurgency, with the militants reportedly seeking to impose Sharia law in one of the country’s Muslim-majority provinces. In the latest major attack, 12 villagers were killed and 14 wounded two weeks ago.
The scenario is starting to look depressingly similar to every other African country when (the Religion of) Peace comes to enrich the populace.
While Mozambique’s Christians are slaughtered in increasing numbers, the West’s Izlumophiliac leaders and our Izlumophiliac Pope will say nothing.
But if (like the Buddhists in Myanmar) the majority Christians decide that enough is enough and start chucking out the Moozerlums, then we’ll hear the usual howls of “Izlumophobia” from the BBC and C4 News and queues of the West’s progressive, liberal, globalist, rapefugee-hugging political leaders.
It’s all so predictable.
That’s what always seems to happen when (the Religion of) Peace comes to town,
Some of you may have watched a BBC2 documentary last night – “The bank that almost broke Britain”. In it, a string of politicians and civil servants tried to make us believe that only their courage and decisiveness saved the British economy from a massive collapse in the banking crisis of 2008. This convenient rewriting of history slightly ignores the fact that these professional spongers handed Britain’s bankrupt banks hundreds of billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money for nothing in return. There were no salary caps for bankers, no restrictions on bankers’ bonuses and absolutely no prosecutions for lying, thieving banksters.
I found the programme’s lies and hagiography particularly difficult to stomach as I was involved very peripherally in the fun and games. In 2005, I published my book “RIP-OFF The Scandalous Inside Story of the Management Consulting Money Machine”. Shortly after publication, I was contacted by someone who claimed to have worked closely with Fred Goodwin (later CEO of the catastrophically badly-managed RBS) on the liquidation of the infamous BCCI (Bank of Credit and Commerce International).
This person said that they could provide evidence that the team run by our favourite banker, Sir Fred, had dishonestly extracted tens of millions of pounds from the BCCI’s creditors. If this person’s allegations were true, then the case could be made that Fred was not a fit and proper person to run a bank.
I contacted the SFO and spoke to a really dopey, useless plod so gave that up as a lost cause. However, I did manage to arrange a phone interview with a very senior individual at the Bank of England (BoE). After I explained the situation, the BoE executive refused to look at the evidence I offered to provide and refused to investigate. You have to remember that, at the time, our Fred was a close chum of Tony and Gordon, that Tony had visited Fred at the Scottish HQ of RBS and that the Queen had even conducted the opening ceremony for RBS’s new £700m Scottish HQ at Gogarburn near Edinburgh. Perhaps appropriately, from 1924 to 1999 Gogarburn was best known as the site for Scotland’s largest mental asylum.
When is a lie not a lie? When it’s a really big one?
But let’s move on from my trivial accusations. Let’s look at what RBS’s CEO, Fred Goodwin and Chairman, Tom McKillop, told RBS shareholders just a few months before they extracted £12bn extra funding from shareholders and just before RBS became the largest banking collapse in British history.
Freddie Boy claimed that RBS has managed to deliver “such a robust performance” because “over a number of years we have diversified the Group’s income streams” and benefited “from our focus on credit quality and risk management”. No warning there about the imminent disaster.
What about Chairman wee Tommy McKillop? What did he have to say to shareholders just prior to the collapse? “We have witnessed the benefits of the Group’s long-standing focus on credit quality and the diversification of our income streams which have allowed us to deliver record profits.” But wee Tommy, when you wrote this, your bank was teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. Weren’t you aware of this? You were the £750,000-a-year RBS Chairman after all.
I don’t know the law. But it’s my understanding that it’s a criminal offence for company executives to make false and misleading statements to shareholders. So I would have thought that CEO Freddy and Chairman Tommy claiming everything at RBS was hunky dory just before the bank’s implosion suggested they were being more than slightly economical with the truth.
But was there any attempt to prosecute them? Of course not. Nobody in power wanted to rock the boat by revealing to us pig-ignorant plebs how thoroughly we’d been shafted by the (IMHO) corrupt, self-serving, greedy, grasping ruling elites.
Accountants not accountable?
One could also wonder how RBS’s accountants signed off the Group’s accounts as smelling of roses just before the biggest banking collapse in British history.
Wait a minute. If I remember correctly, RBS’s accountants were none other than Big Four firm Deloittes – Fred’s former employers before he moved from being a beancounter to becoming the world’s worst banker.
A bit of you cover my back and I’ll cover yours, perhaps?
I found this story interesting. I’ll just summarise it briefly, then you can read the whole story if you like.
Tommy Robinson did an hour-long interview with Sky News. In it he was asked a question about an educational film made by the Dutch Government warning Dutch girls about the dangers of being groomed and then lured into sex, rape and prostitution by our dear friends from our most favourite religion.
The interviewer asked whether Tommy Robinson didn’t think that this film would incite fear of those from our favourite religion. He replied that he didn’t care if “it” (the film) incited fear as long as it protected young girls from being raped. Sky News then took this answer to a question about the Dutch Government film and made it look like Tommy Robinson was actually saying that he didn’t mind if “he” (his views) incited fear of our Izlumic friends. here’s the headline Sky News used for the interview: “Tommy Robinson: I don’t care if I incite fear of Muslims”
But can we trust what Tommy Robinson claims? Well, yes we can. Expecting that Sky News would twist his answers against him, he got his cousin to secretly record the whole interview.
Gotcha!
Tommy Robinson says he’s going to sue Sky – I really hope he does!
First, I’ll leave this up for another couple of days. It’s not because I’m against the royal family. In fact, I think the Queen is an amazing asset to the country. It’s just a pity that Charles is such a (IMHO) dimwitted, self-absorbed, worthless, gutless, complaining, miserable little turd.
I suspect lots of readers like to moan about lots of things. But I further suspect that 90% or more won’t lift a finger to actually do anything to help change the things that are going wrong with our country.
So, here’s a chance for the “we-can’t-be-bothered” brigade to do something. It won’t even cost you any money and I know how important their money is to so many readers.
If you go to this website (link below) you can sign a petition demanding that the (IMHO) useless, low-IQ, sponger and parasite Prince “Airmiles Andy” Andrew pays for his own holiday-loving, gravitationally-challenged daughter’s wedding rather than expecting us dirty, ignorant, unwashed plebs to foot the £2m+ security bill.
This got such a brief mention on the Trump-loathing British mainstream media today that you might have missed it. Canada’s metrosexual, rapefugee-hugging, West-hating, globalist man-child leader, Justin Trudeau, has just caved in to Trump’s demands and agreed a new NAFTA trade deal. The new deal, as one would expect from a deal negotiated by Trump, works in the US’s favour and is less generous to Mexico and Canada than the previous arrangement.
Yet another success for democratically-elected President Trump – a patriot who puts his country’s interests above those of the globalist bankers and bureaucratic elites. That will have the libtard Trumpophobics choking on their organic muesli this morning.
If only we had Trump negotiating Brexit, instead of the hopeless, hapless, treacherous, bungling May!
3. “Bacon”? They should have written “ham”!
Here’s some graffiti that was written on the side of a mosque in Newcastle:
I, of course, am furious at this racism (even though Izlum is not a race). So are local politicians. “This is an outrageous attack on our community,” thundered local councillor John-Paul Stephenson, of the Labour Party. He went on: “This attack goes against everything we stand for. Councillors will be meeting with the mosque to discuss this and offer the support we can. Attacks like this will not be tolerated in our community.”
It seems that Labour politicians are extraordinarily tolerant when “Asians” are gang-raping, gang-sodomising and gang-torturing at least 50,000 underage white girls in “diverse” communities across the country (including quite a few in Newcastle) over at least 15 years and probably much longer.
But when some bozo scrawls “Bacon” on a mosque wall, suddenly Labour politicians are outraged. Strange priorities?
No doubt, the local plods will take time off ignoring burglaries, muggings, stabbings and robberies because they’re too busy trawling the Internet looking for supposed ‘hate crimes’ and local police bosses will allocate huge resources to finding the perpetrator(s) of this totally trivial and unimportant incident.
As for whoever committed the evil act, they should be careful and remember how Kevin Crehan was sent to his death for leaving some bacon or something like that outside a mosque.
But anyway, wasn’t it a bit stupid to write the word “Bacon” on the mosque wall? They could have written “Ham” instead. Then, if they were caught, they could have claimed they were really trying to write “Hamas” but got interrupted.
If they said they were trying to write “Hamas”, no doubt local Labour politicians would be lauding them as heroes in the struggle against the supposed “Zionist oppressors” whom the (IMHO) deeply anti-semitic, Izlumophiliac Jeremy Corbyn and his Momentum chums seem to hate so much.
David Craig, on October 11th, 2018
