Here’s a quote from Sir Keir ‘not queer’ Starmer: “This is disgraceful. It’s disgusting and it’s not to be tolerated“
But what was the great Sir Keir referring to? Was it the mass, industrialised oral, vaginal and anal rape and torture of tens of thousands of underage White girls by our friends from our favourite religion? Rapes by mostly Labour voters which were covered up by Labour politicians, Labour councillors, Labour-supporting social workers and police (several of whom are alleged to have joined in the ‘fun’)?
Of course, not. It seems to a cynic like myself that Labour leader and former DPP Sir Keir were rather keen on allowing the raping and abuse of mostly underage White girls to continue for decades as they were desperate to keep the Religion of Peace votes.
No, what Sir Keir said was “disgraceful, disgusting and not to be tolerated” was some AI programme owned by Elon Musk which allowed users to generate dirty pictures.
This AI programme has apparently infuriated several members of our Labour (IMHO) rape-enabling government.
Liz Kendall, the Technology Secretary, she would also make creating the images a priority offence under the Online Safety Act, meaning sites such as X would have to prove they are taking steps to prevent the images. She said: “No woman or child should live in fear of having their image sexually manipulated by technology.”
Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy said he had raised the “horrendous, horrific situation” with US vice president JD Vance.
Trade Secretary Peter Kyle, who previously served as technology secretary, told Sky News X “is not doing enough to keep its customers safe online”
Of course, we all know what is really happening. Elon Musk has criticised Starmer’s Labour for its Orwellian crushing of free speech. So Starmer and his political pygmies are using the supposedly ‘independent’ media regulator Ofcom to try to ban Musk’s X. By the way, other countries which have banned X are: China · Iran · Turkmenistan · North Korea · Myanmar · Russia · Pakistan · Venezuela.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the US administration responded by closing down the UK’s Washington Embassy banning all embassy staff and banning all Labour politicians from entering the US?
In a blog last week I tried to explain that the mainstream media pamic about Trump supposedly being about to invade Greenlad was complete twaddle. I wrote:
This is classic Trump ‘Art of the Deal‘. You decide what you want. You then make a completely unrealistic demand which is well in excess of what you really want – “I’m gonna invade Greenland”. Your opponent has a panicked reaction to that outlandish demand rather than having the intelligence to work out what you really want. Then you reach the compromise you always wanted.
Trump can see the strategic and economic importance of Greenland. He probably wants security guarantees keeping Russia and Chinese influence out of Greenland. And when all the heat and noise about the supposed “invasion” of Greenland dies down, Trump will get what he wanted all along.
My dog could have worked this out. But apparently this is well beyond the intellectual capabilities of our Trump-hating rulers and mainstream media.
Anyway, we now see the results of Trump’s supposed “threat”. NATO has agreed to look at a role in sending troops to Greenland to block Russian and Chinese influence on the island. And this is probably what Trump wanted all along.
Will Cuba become a US state?
Here’s an outlandish prediction: within the lifetime of our children, Cuba will become a US state. At the moment Trump has Cuba by the short and curlies. Following the capture of Maduro and his missus, Trump can cut off oil supplies to the country whenever he wants. That would collapse the Cuban economy and bring down the Cuban Communist government. Nobody knows how Trump will use this new power. But I can see a situation whereby the US offers a deal to ordinary Cubans: bring down your government and you can join the US and get freedom and billions in development aid.
Peace in the Middle East?
Of course, the biggest prize for possibly one of the best US presidents ever would be bringing peace to the Middle East. Not because of some prize handed out by a few dopey Norwegians, but because this would change the world for ever.
If Trump plays his cards right, he could help bring down the Mad Mullahs’ terrorist Iranian Islamic regime and replace the theocracy with a more Westernised democracy, The benefits would be incredible:
remove all sanctions from Persia and allow Persians’ money to be used for the Persian population
deprive Hamas and Hezbollah and all the other bearded crazies of funding, support and weapons
allow Persia and Israel to live in peace
flood the world oil market bringing down prices and thus bankrupting Russia
depriving Russia of almost its only ally leaving it with just North Korea and a lukewarm China
But the Israel-loathing Islamophiliacs at the Al-BBC and much of the UK mainstream media are horrified by the scenario of Trump achieving such a triumph and Israel’s worst enemy being defeated. For the Al-BBC and their progressive, lefty, West-hating dinner party friends, the destruction of Israel would bring nothing but joy and jubilation.
And finally I’ll end with a quote I made up a couple of days ago: “As the Iranian Islamo-fascist regime collapses, the most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Islamo-fascist Iranian Caliphate in Western Europe”. (David Craig)
Oh no, here I go again. I had hoped to stop blogging this week and spare you all from my inanities.
But something strange is happening. In a massive uprising which has now spread to all Iran’s 31 provinces, there is the possibility that Iranians are about to demolish the hated Islamic Republic. Rumours are that the bearded lunatic Ayatollah Khameni has already planned his escape to Moscow with 20 members of his family and many of the billions he has looted from his people. The authorities have started killing protestors. But there are signs that several parts of the military are refusing to slaughter innocent civilians to protect the crazed Ayatollahs’ terror regime.
If Iran’s Ayatollahs are defeated and the country moves towards the West under the guidance of the Shah’s exiled son, this would be a catastrophe for Iran’s terrorist chums – Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis and, of course, Russia. It would also signal a new era of peace and prosperity in the Middle East in which Israel would come out the winner. And maybe that’s the problem – Britain’s political, academic and media elites loathe Israel even more than they despise the useless Ayatollahs. The collapse of Iran’s Ayatollahs’ regime would be a huge victory for Israel and Western values. As our ruling elites despise Western values while they try to turn Britain into a new Caliphate, the collase of Iran’s Caliphate would undermine our elites’ plans to replace Western civilisation with their beloved Turd-world barbarism.
Moreover, Trump has threatened to intervene should the Ayatollahs start massacring Iranians. No doubt if Trump did intervene, our elites would all start screamaing about America ‘breaking international law’.
And so, there is a virtual silence from our elites about what is happening in Iran as our elites hate Israel and Trump so profoundly and adore the Religion of Peace so much that they don’t give a damn over how many innocent Iranians are slaughtered.
Shame on us.
One last small thought. When criticising the autoritarianism of the EU, former USSR premier Mikhail Gorbachev is quoted as saying something like:
As the Iranian religious-lunatic Caliphate collapses just like the Soviet Union did, we could possibly update Gorbachev’s statement: “The most puzzling development in politics during the last decade is the apparent determination of Western European leaders to re-create the Islamo-fascist Iranian Caliphate in Western Europe”. (David Craig)
Well that didn’t last long. I had intended to give up wasting your time and mine with my inane blogging. But sometimes something so idiotic happens that I almost feel forced to shed light on the idiocy.
Following the US raid on Venezuela and the arrest of Maduro, Trump has also reportedly doubled down on his claim that “the US wants Greenland”.
This seems to have caused absolute panic amongst other NATO countries and their rulers are rushing around squawking like headless chickens (do headless chickens squawk?). Meanwhile the mainstream media vomits out endless bilge about how a US “invasion” of Greeneland could shatter NATO. And the Danish government beats its chest declaring boldly that Denmark’s ‘massive armed forces’ – about 20 soldiers who only work Monday to Friday from 09.30 to 16.30 and probably have about two rusty rifles to share between them – will defend Greenland against the evil Yankees.
What a load of absolute bull’s manure!
This is classic Trump ‘Art of the Deal‘. You decide what you want. You then make a completely unrealistic demand which is well in excess of what you really want – “I’m gonna invade Greenland”. Your opponent has a panicked reaction to that outlandish demand rather than having the intelligence to work out what you really want. Then you reach the compromise you always wanted.
Trump can see the strategic and economic importance of Greenland. He probably wants security guarantees keeping Russia and Chinese influence out of Greenland. And when all the heat and noise about the supposed “invasion” of Greenland dies down, Trump will get what he wanted all along.
My dog could have worked this out. But apparently this is well beyond the intellectual capabilities of our Trump-hating rulers and mainstream media.
For about 20 years in my books and blogs, I’ve tried to warn people about what’s happening to our country. My latest book ‘THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS’ was, I believe, my best.
But its has all been a complete waste of time – pissing into a hurricane. Britain is bankrupt and broken. Once the greatest country in the world, Britain is now a second- or third-rate joke. We have a government which loathes us and our country and is intent on destroying our history and culture. Our Net Zero stupidity is giving us the world’s highest energy prices and will decimate what little is left of British industry. Our useless, underperforming, do-nothing public sector keeps expanding – it has added over 62,000 more waste-of-skins under Labour – and is so large that no amount of tax revenue will ever be enough to feed it. We have DIE (Diversity, Inclusion and Equity) hordes mainly from corrupt Third-world countries deciding who can come into our country and who get their hands on taxpayer money. And you can probably guess which groups they favour. Our borders are non-existent and hundreds of thousands of often sub-human, often uneducated, often unemployable, often criminal, often deeply misogynist pieces of Third-world garbage pour into our country at massive expense to Britain’s ever-dwindling number of taxpayers, while our best and brightest flee abroad.
Within 25 years White British will probably be a minority in their own country. The possibility of civil war seems to be becoming ever more likely.
Sometimes I look at how anti-British all his policies are and I wonder whether Davos-man Starmer is deliberately trying to provoke the White British population into anti-government violence so he can introduce a ‘state of emergency’ and use this to further provoke us giving him an excuse to cancel future elections?
I tried to modernise my approach by producing some AI satirical videos. Here they are for the last time ever:
But these were banned by YouTube. Although I thought you at first got a warning from YouTube if you had broken their rules, my appeal against this ban was immediately rejected.
I had also hoped that my website would fund itself by helping sell a few books. But I only get about £1 for each book sold and am now selling so few books that I’m losing money.
Anyway, there are so many people doing what I tried to do but much better than I could manage:
History Debunked by Simon Webb
The Daily Sceptic
The Blackbelt Barrister
Professor Matt Goodwin
etc etc
So, I guess it’s time for me to pack it in.
By the way, there’s one reader who has been generously donating about £30 a year in small monthly payments. Many thanks, but could you please cancel your payments.
Keir has prormised to “smash the evil, people-smuggling gangs”. The result – illegal Channel crossings are approaching record levels:
But, no problem. Keir Starmer has promised to “clear the illegal migrant backlog”. How will he do this? By handing out British citizenships to every piece of often undocumented, often uneducated, often unemployable, often West-hating, often culturally backward third-world garbage who arrives in Britain:
But don’t surprised. We’ve been here before. In my 2008 book “Squandered: How Gordon Brown Is Wasting Over One Trillion Pounds of Our Money” I showed what Blair’s government did when criticised for allowing the number of migrant asylum applications to rocket:
Blair’s government started handing out British citizenships like confetti. This allowed the (IMHO) lying PoS Blair to claim that asylum applications had fallen.
And, of course, although I exposed this scam, nobody in the Blair-adoring mainstream media thought it worth reporting how the British were being lied to.
I don’t normally watch any YouTube video longer than about 15 minutes. It seems to me that most longer videos could have said in five minutes or less what they spend ten times that waffling. Many presenters become so inebriated with their own pompous verbosity that they never seem to stop Could I be thinking about people like you, David Starkey?
However, when I started watching the video linked below, I found the presenter so articulate and so presuasive that I thought it worth watching to the end.
There is just one area where I disagree with Professor Betz. He envisages a civil war where (presumably white British) militias cut off supplies like electricity, gas, food and water to make life intolerable in the main cities where our multi-cultural enriching friends tend to congregate in order to force them to choose to leave Britain. I think it’s more likely that the invaders will decide that our country now belongs to them and so will fight back massacring families and stealing supplies in villages where white British tend to live.
But whichever scenario plays out, the future doesn’t look overly pleasant.
As we stumble miserably towards the end of one of the worst years in Britain’s recent history, I thought it might be worth taking a couple of moments to muse upon the difference between ‘Science’ and ‘The Science’.
According to one dictionary definition, ‘Science is the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation, experimentation, and the testing of theories against the evidence obtained.’ So ‘Science’ seems to be a constant process of experimentaion, challenging, testing and learning.
‘The Science’ seems to be something quite different. ‘The Science’ is something which our ruling political, academic and media elites declare to be the one and only truth. It is supposedly ‘settled’, cannot be questioned and anyone who dares question ‘The Science’ is either a crazed conspracy theorist or just like a Holocaust denier and so should be ignored, cancelled, hounded out of their job and banned from ever publishing the results of any of their work.
So, ‘The Science’ is almost the opposite of ‘Science’. This conflict between ‘Science’ and ‘The Science’ and the Establishment’s brutal suppression of anyone questioning ‘The Science’ are, of course, nothing new. We’ll all be familiar with the story of astronomer and mathematical genius Galileo Galilei. When finally brought before the Inquisition for the heresy of claiming that the Sun (not the Earth) was the centre of the universe Galileo was found:
“vehemently suspect of heresy” (though he was never formally charged with heresy, relieving him of facing corporal punishment), namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, and that one may hold and defend an opinion as probable after it has been declared contrary to Holy Scripture. He was required to “abjure, curse and detest” those opinions.
He was sentenced to formal imprisonment at the pleasure of the Inquisition. On the following day, this was commuted to house arrest, under which he remained for the rest of his life.
His offending Dialogue was banned; and in an action not announced at the trial, publication of any of his works was forbidden, including any he might write in the future
And there are probably many more such historical examples of people being crushed for questioning ‘The Science’. The public excoriation of Charles Darwin after his publication of ‘The Origin of the Species’ springs to mind.
So, is today any different? We seem to be bombarded with many examples of what we are told to accept is ‘The Science’:
“Diversity is our strength” we are told, when time after time we see that when societies become too diverse they become fragmented, trust falls, different groups fight over resources and Lebanonisation and even civil war is often the result. But if you dare question mass uncontrolled immigration you’re branded a bigot, a racist, a fascist and you’re likely to lose your job and even be imprisoned
“Increasing CO2 is leading to Global Boiling’ and the only way we can avoid our own extinction is by committing economic suicide through slashing use of fossil fuels, moving to expensive and unreliable supposed ‘renewables’ and becoming dependent on China for manufactured goods. You won’t get far in life, if you try to expose this modern-day end-of-times death cult for the complete nonsense it is
“Populism is a threat to Democracy” – In Germany the main political parties have tried to have the ever more popular Alternativ fur Deutschland (AfD) banned for supposedly being a ‘threat to democracy’. As Reform increase their share of the polls, we can expect similar attacks on them. To the LibLabCon Uniparty, any challenge to them is “a threat to Democracy”
There is no difference in IQ between different races” – as I don’t want to be hauled away by Starmer’s Thought Police, I won’t comment on this particular piece of ‘The Science’
“All cultures are equal” – as in the above point, as I don’t want to be hauled away by Starmer’s Thought Police, I won’t comment on this particular piece of ‘The Science’
“The Religion of Peace is a peaceful Religion” – as in the above two points, as I don’t want to be hauled away by Starmer’s Thought Police, I won’t comment on this particular piece of ‘The Science’ and so will not list examples of mass slaughter being carried out every single day by people who clearly ‘misunderstand’ the peacefuness of that particular religion
“The vaccines are safe and effective” we were assured and will prevent you killing granny. Firstly, this is a lie as the vaccines were never tested to see if they reduced transmission of the Chinese lab-leaked plague. And secondly, the vaccines were only slightly effective in reducing the risk of hospital admissions for limited vulnerable groups of people. To force widespread vaccination may well have caused more damage than it prevented.
You can probably think of many more examples where there seems to be a not inconsiderable difference between what ‘The Science’ and ‘Science’ are telling us.
So, to get back to the original question: ‘Is today any different?’
I think it is. I believe that today we are in a world where the beliefs and priorities of the ruling political, academic and media elites are in direct conflict with the beliefs and priorities of the majority of people. The elites believe that countries should no longer exist as they lead to xenophobia and conflict, that borders should be open to mass migration, that all cultures are equal, that the West is somehow inherently evil and exploitative for being so successful when so many other parts of the world have failed, that we would all be better off ruled by transnational globalist bodies like the EU, UN, WEF, WHO etc etc. And so Western ruling elites have constructed a series of lies – ‘The Science’ – to bludgeon us into submission with their world view. Anyone daring to question those lies – ‘The Science’ – by using real ‘Science’ is hounded by the Thought Police, threatened with losing their jobs and forced into silence and even imprisonment.
I doubt whether the gulf between ‘Science’ and ‘The Science’ has ever been larger than it is in our blighted times.
The BBC-adoring elites are bleating and howling about how The Donald’s court action against the BBC will have to be paid by ordinary license payers. But I don’t see it that way at all. I think the lefty Uk-hating, Israel-loathing, Islamophiliac, climate-catastrophist BBC propaganda machine has just over 21,000 employees. If the salaries of the top 5,000 were to be cut by say £20,000 a year each and the salaries of the next 5,000 were cut be say £10,000 each, that would generate about £150,000,000 a year. For ten years that would save £1.5bn. That would surely be enough to satisfy The Donald. I wonder why nobody else has thought of this elegant solution to the BBC’s latest self-inflicted crisis?
Though I rather suspect most Brits hope that The Donald will bankrupt the useless, perpetually-biased anti-British BBC.
My rough calculation suggests that we are now on about 1,382 days since Russia’s February 24 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Just to put that into context, WWI lasted 1,562 days and WWII 2,194 days. So Putin’s war with Ukraine is likely to last as long as the whole of WWI.
Let’s look at what Putin has gained from close to 4 years of war.
The land area of Russia is 17.1 km2. The land area of Ukraine is 604,628 km2. So Russia is about 28 times larger than Ukraine. Russia has captured about 20% of Ukraine – say about 120,000 km2. So, after almost four years of slaughter, Russia has increased its land area by a pathetic 0.7%.
The popuation density of Russia is 8.5 people per km2. For Ukraine it’s about 70 people per km2, for the EU it’s about 109 people per km2 and for the UK it’s about 287 people per km2. Moreover, the population of Russia is declining from about 145 million in 2000 to less than 130 million now due to low birth rates and low life expectancy:
Russia’s birth rate is around 1.5 children per woman (the replacement rate is usually considered to be 2.1 children per woman). Moreover, before the Ukraine invasion Russian life expectancy was about 73 years compared to 81.7 years in the EU and around 81 years in the UK.
Meanwhile, China is slowly but surely taking over huge swathes of Russia’s Far East by buying up Russia’s resources and moving Chinese workers into Russia. China is also changing the names of Russian cities in Russia’s Far East on maps to the original Chinese names before they were ceded to Russia.
Conclusion: Russia is a massive underpopulated country with huge resources and a declining population which has spent almost four years fighting a war with probably 250,000+ dead Russians and another 700,000+ seriously injured to expand its territory by well under 1% while actually losing territory to China.
This is truly madness. Our rulers keep on blethering about peace talks. But Putin cannot risk peace. He is so deep into his ‘two-week’ (four-year) invasion of Ukraine, he can never back down. There can only be peace when the leading Russian multi-billionaire klepto-oligarchs, decide that continuing this war is no longer in their financial interests, throw Putin out and move to reintegrate Russia with the West.
The readers’ comments are the best bit
The video below claims to show a Ukrainian underwater drone blowing up a Russian submarine in a Russian port. In the readers’ comments, one reader wrote “I wonder who is going to explain what has happened to Putin”. Another reader suggested: “Comrade Putin, I have some great news, one of our submarines has destroyed a Ukrainian underwater drone”. Thank heavens for the British sense of humour!
David Craig, on January 13th, 2026
