OMG! OMG! OMG! What to say? When even the royalty-obsessed Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday turn against the royal family, you know things are really bad.
I’m afraid my stomach wasn’t strong enough to watch the supposedly ‘no holds barred’ interview done by Emily Maitlis with Prince Andrew. But I picked up a few impressions from the press reports.
I had been expecting Maitlis to ‘do a Chakrabarti’. I’ve no idea (having not watched the interview) whether she was as ‘forensic’ and brutal with Andrew as she usually is on TV with anyone daring to suggest we leave the EU (constantly interrupting them and shouting them down) or whether Maitlis was grovellingly sycophantic. From the little I could stomach, I felt she did treat Andrew rather deferentially. But Andrew is (IMHO) such an arrogant, brainless, clueless, spoilt, self-opiniated, dumbassed clod that he managed to repeatedly incriminate himself despite Maitlis’s kid-gloves treatment of him. I doubt Maitlis will be joining Dame Shami ‘Shameless’ Chakrabarti in the Lords, honoured (IMHO) for her services to the whitewash industry.
Maybe these are some of Prince Andrew’s greatest hits from his motorway pile-up interview:
Firstly, the reason our noble Prince stuck with Epstein, even after Epstein’s conviction, was because Prince Andrew was too honourable: “I admit fully my judgment was probably coloured by my tendency to be too honourable”.
Secondly, I did see a very brief excerpt from the interview on the Internet. Looking at Prince A’s body language one might notice he blinks quite a bit when claiming he doesn’t remember the girl he is alleged to have had sex with when she was 17-years-old. From a guide to reading body language here’s a possible explanation: “Blinking is a neat natural process whereby the eyelids wipe the eyes clean, much as a windscreen wiper on a car. Blink rate tends to increase when people are thinking more or are feeling stressed. This can be an indication of lying as the liar has to keep thinking about what they are saying”
Thirdly, if I have understood correctly the great Prince suggested that the photo of him with his arm around the girl’s waist might have been faked as it was ‘taken upstairs’ at Ms Maxwell’s London house and Andrew had, he claimed, never been upstairs there. But, if he had never been upstairs, how did he know the photo had been taken upstairs? Oooops!
You might be wondering why Prince Andrew became one of Epstein’s friends in the first place. If I remember correctly, Epstein started his career as a Maths teacher in a New York school. He was noticed by the father of one of his students and offered a job on Wall Street. Due to his mathematical genius he managed to amass a huge fortune and move into the top levels of society.
Given Prince Andrew’s well-known reputation as an intellectual colossus, it’s quite clear to me that Andrew and Epstein became friends due to their shared interest in discussing complex mathematical concepts rather than Epstein’s ability to provide an almost limitless number of recently pubescent females for his own and his friends’ pleasure. Here’s that well-known picture of Andrew and Epstein discussing mathematics where our great Prince is explaining some complicated mathematical theorem to an obviously impressed Epstein:
After his success on TV on Saturday evening, I rather suspect Prince Andrew will be reducing his public appearances and spending more time with his golf clubs and less time representing once great Britain.
But while the British media still tiptoe around Randy Andy’s alleged cavorting at Mr Epstein’s many young-female-stuffed residences around the world, the Australian press has not been quite so forgiving:
Here’s a ‘best clips’ compilation of some of our most intelligent and educated friends from the Religion of Peacefulness and Tolerance calmly discussing important issues on TV.
They do seem rather excitable – no wonder they keep trying to kill each other.
Makes the BBC’s (IMHO) biased, UK-hating, europhiliac, climate-change-obsessed, rapemigrant-hugging, politically-correct Question Time look even more boring than it currently is.
Three of the greatest political novels in the English language are probably George Orwell’s Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
Animal Farm (published in 1945) was a brilliant prediction of how communist/socialist societies would develop into dictatorships. The novels Nineteen Eighty-Four (published 1949) and Brave New World (published 1932), on the other hand, gave two very different visions of how democratic societies would morph into totalitarian states.
Nineteen Eighty-Four takes place in an imagined future, the year 1984, when much of the world has fallen victim to perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance, a total rewriting of history and propaganda. Great Britain, known as Airstrip One, has become a province of a superstate named Oceania that is ruled by the Party who employ the Thought Police to persecute individuality and independent thinking. Big Brother, the leader of the Party, enjoys an intense cult of personality despite the fact that he may not even exist.
Brave New World: In Huxley’s vision, people would be controlled by providing them pleasure – unlimited trivial entertainment, a constants supply of drugs and total sexual freedom. A distracted and dumbed-down population then lacks the mental resources to resist their enslavement.
Orwell feared the totalitarian government would ban books. Huxley feared that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egotism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture. In Nineteen Eighty-Four, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. Orwell feared that our fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that our desire will ruin us.
Now, more than half a century after the publication of both books, we can see where their predictions were accurate. China, with its plan to rate every citizen by the level of their ‘social credits’, is developing more towards an Orwellian surveillance dictatorship. Though Orwell’s concept of ‘Thought Police’ and people being destroyed for ‘Wrong-Think’ has been effectively used in the West to silence any criticism of the progressive, globalists’ plans to abolish nation states and put us all under the control of large, bureaucrat-run, corrupt superstates. However, apart from wrong-thought being persecuted, the West, with its obsession with entertainment, triviality, narcissism and celebration of ignorance, looks more like Huxley’s future world than Orwell’s.
What neither author could foresee, is that the West would be threatened by an invasion of people whose world view hadn’t changed in over a thousand years – a people who hadn’t gone through an Enlightenment and who therefore wanted to conquer rather than assimilate. Though Huxley did correctly predict that we would be so emasculated by our obsession with our own instant gratification that we wouldn’t have the moral strength to defend our civilisation.
Should the voting age be raised to 30?
And while we’re on the subject of trivialisation, narcissism and the celebration of ignorance, here’s R***, an 18-year-old student, taking part in a discussion about the General Election on something called the Victoria Derbyshire Show on the BBC yesterday.
R*** apparently believes that Nigel Farage is leader of the LibDems. Enlightening us with her youthful wisdom, R*** said Nigel was like a bird because “he was part of the Lib Dems, and I like where they’re going with things, how they’re kind of focussed…”
Weep for your beloved country when we give the vote to intellectual colossi like this young lady. Thank you R*** for providing clear evidence that the voting age should be raised to at least thirty!!!!
First, can I recommend that readers click on the headline of yesterday’s blog? There are some great, well-informed readers’ comments.
Talking of readers’ comments, yesterday I wrote the following comment on the Times website following an article on universities brainwashing students with ‘progressive’, left-wing, politically-correct nonsense:
Given that you can now get into ‘Uni’ with just two E Grades at A Level and without being able to even spell the word ‘university’, I humbly suggest that for many of today’s students the words ‘university education’ are an oxymoron. Thankfully, most of today’s students won’t know what an ‘oxymoron’ is, so they won’t be able to take offense and rush into their ‘safe space’ due to my comment.
Within less than five minutes another reader reported my comment to the moderators/censors for being ‘offensive’ and it was deleted.
Free speech anyone?
Fishlake – could there be a clue in the name?
You’ll all know about the flooding in a town called ‘Fishlake’. And, of course, as usual the ecofascists and Greta-worshippers are blaming it on Climate Change or Climate Breakdown or Climate Emergency or whatever it’s called this week:
I’m no environmental expert. But I did wonder for a brief moment whether there might just be a clue in the name of the town ‘Fishlake’. The word ‘lake’ – doesn’t that have something to do with water? And the word ‘fish’? Might there be a greater risk of flooding if one buys a house in Fishlake than if one bought a house half-way up a mountain?
In fact, as far as I understand, Fishlake is situated slap bang in the middle of what was once a floodplain. Moreover, Sheffield, Rotherham and Doncaster are among the places flooded, 12 years after they were badly hit when the River Don burst its banks in 2007. Many affected areas, including Meadowhall shopping centre, where customers were stranded overnight, lie within the river’s floodplain – low-lying land next to the river that naturally floods during high flow.
A local expert, who clearly hadn’t read the politically-correct BBC script that everything was due to ‘Climate Change’, sensibly explained: “This is only a problem if you develop floodplains by building houses, businesses and factories on them, which is obviously what we have done over the years, so to some degree it’s a problem of our own making.”
This rare piece of common sense came from Roy Mosley, the head of conservation and land management at Sheffield and Rotherham Wildlife Trust. Mr Mosley added: “The risk faced by floodplain communities is exacerbated by the management of land upstream of the city. Intensive animal grazing leads to short grass and compacted soil, which is less able to absorb and hold water. There are no longer enough trees and plants to absorb rain and stop it from running straight into the river.”
Given that the sensible Mr Mosley didn’t blame climate change for the floods, one could wonder how long he’ll be employed.
A separate report on flood management noted: “In 2016, the planting of 40,000 trees above Pickering in North Yorkshire was credited with helping the frequently flooded town avert inundation during heavy rainfall by slowing the flow of water into the river and reducing its peak height. The £500,000 project was significantly cheaper than a proposed new flood wall.”
It has always surprised me that people who buy homes in places like Little Crapington on Sea are amazed when their homes are affected by coastal erosion and demand compensation; people who buy homes with names like ‘Riverview Cottage’ are dumbfounded when their homes are flooded after heavy rain and demand compensation; people who buy homes near rapidly-growing airports are outraged every time a plane flies over their home and demand compensation; people who buy homes with ‘convenient access to the motorway’ complain about traffic noise and demand compensation and people who buy homes on floodplains cannot understand why their homes look like swimming pools every now and then, blame the Government for their own stupidity and demand compensation.
Slightly following on from yesterday’s blog about the lying ecofascists’ lying lies, I thought some readers might find the video below interesting (apologies if you’ve already seen it).
It seems that a vlogger was contacted by a 15-year-old schoolboy. The boy was concerned about the constant brainwashing of schoolchildren with what we could call ‘New-Truth’. According to New-Truth:
diversity is our strength
immigration is good for us
human activity is responsible for a coming Human Extinction due to man-made Climate Change
LGBT++ is better than traditional families with a male father and a female mother
white colonialism is responsible for all of Africa’s problems
all crime is due to social inequality
the Religion of Peace is a religion of peace
all borders should be torn down and people allowed to live where they want
Israel is a creation of the devil and should be handed over to the Arabs
Sharia Law should be instituted across Europe
anyone can be whatever gender with which they wish to self-identify
all races have exactly the same IQ levels
etc etc etc (I’m sure you can all think of other aspects of New-Truth
In our schools – our lefty madrassas – New-Truth is not to be questioned. Anyone who doubts any aspect of New-Truth deserves to be silenced, ostracised and destroyed. If you remember, a few months ago a schoolboy was thrown out of his school for insisting there were only two sexes/genders – a clear violation of New-Truth
Anyway, here’s the video. It’s a rather frightening insight into today’s Orwellian British education system in which there is only one truth – New-Truth:
I really wanted to give up writing this stupid blog after 97% of readers couldn’t be arsed to view my latest YouTube video and couldn’t be arsed to send the link on to other people they know. When writing this thing, I was naive enough to hope occasionally for some reciprocity and just a little effort from those who read it. Sadly, I am usually disappointed.
But then I came across so much stuff, that people need to know about, that decided I might as well continue in spite of 97%+ of my readers’ total do-nothing apathy.
The latest ecofascist lies
I have previously explained how the lying ecofascists’ claim that 97% of scientists agree that man is responsible for Global Warming is a pack of lies:
And now the lying greeny, Greta-exploiting, eco-scumbags have come up with another similarly Brobdingnagian pile of putrid cr*p.
Here’s what the Guardian newspaper wrote this week:
The world’s people face “untold suffering due to the climate crisis” unless there are major transformations to global society, according to a stark warning from more than 11,000 scientists. “We declare clearly and unequivocally that planet Earth is facing a climate emergency
The story was carried by hyperventilating TV news and newspapers around the world. But here’s someone who took a moment to question the “more than 11,000 scientists” claim.
This video at around 20 minutes is longer than I would usually recommend. But you don’t have to watch it all to see what a pack of lies the “more than 11,000 scientists” claim is. But the lying eco-loon liars get away with this North-Korea-style propaganda because nobody in the mainstream media or in politics dares question the great new Climate Emergency religion.
(by the way, readers can read or leave comments by clicking on the title of the blog)
Now I know. I’ve been wasting my time. I should have realised this a long time ago.
Despite having my latest video up on my blog for the last few days, most readers couldn’t be bothered to watch it. I guess they must all be very very busy people.
Moreover, I guess fewer than 3 or 4 readers could be arsed to send to link to their contacts.
Today I wanted to introduce my latest YouTube video. But first I’d like to spend a couple of minutes on the catastrophe that is the Tories’ election campaign
Prepare for Prime Minister Corbyn?
I saw a few minutes of Corbyn’s election campaign speech yesterday. In spite of being an antediluvian Marxist maniac, he was a surprisingly effective speaker. Moreover, he seems to have some of the best lines – “The NHS is not for sale” and “We’ll nationalise the rip-off rail, energy and water companies” and “We’ll build a million affordable homes” are going to be very appealing to a population which has been brainwashed by the BBC and other media into believing that the state should look after them for life, that everyone is a victim and that nobody has responsibility for their own lives.
Meanwhile the Tory campaign is already in complete meltdown. First we had Jacob Rees-Mogg’s extraordinarily insensitive comment about how some of the people who died in the Grenfell Tower fire could have saved themselves if they had used their “common sense” and defied the London Fire Brigade’s “Stay Put” advice. While what he said may be true, it showed a massive lack of common sense on his part to say this in a country where (as I write above) the population has been brainwashed by the BBC and other media into believing that the state should look after them for life, that everyone is a victim and that nobody has responsibility for their own lives.
Rees-Mogg’s comments reinforced the worst possible stereotypes of Tories as being a bunch of smug, uncaring, toff millionaires totally out of touch with ordinary people. I believe Johnson should have showed some backbone and sacked Rees-Mogg on the spot. Rees-Mogg will now be a constant cancer on the Tories’ campaign and may even help lose them the election.
And then we have battering-ram Nigel Farage. Farage has done our country a massive service by almost getting us out of the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic EU. But now’s the time to control his ever-expanding ego and step aside to give the Tories the best chance of winning a majority. Farage’s foam-flecked loathing of the EU, while justifiable, is only going to help Labour and the LibDems and harm the Tories.
As I have been warning for years, if Corbyn gets into Downing Street, even as a minority government, either alone or with support from the LibDems and the ghastly Scrots he’ll lower the voting age to 16 thus ensuring the annihilation of the Tories at the next election and that Labour never loses power again.
Our National Anthem for a politically-correct Britain
Below is a link to my latest YouTube video – our National Anthem for a politically-correct, woke Britain.
I’d be grateful if readers could send the link to as many people as possible including journalists, newspapers and other bloggers to maximise the number of people who view the video.
I’ll leave this up for a few days so that more people can see it:
I’m busy working on my next video. But I guess no week would be complete without a few heartwarming stories of multi-cultural, vibrant enrichment of our once great continent – the kind of stories the BBC and C4 News often ‘forget’ to mention.
France
Vandals went through a graveyard in southwest France before dawn last Wednesday smashing anything relating to Christian symbolism, including dozens of stone crosses, crucifixes, and images of angels and the Virgin Mary.
According to local reports, the marauders profaned nearly 100 Christian graves in the Breuil cemetery in Cognac, destroying mostly crosses but also smashing a number of statues, plaques, and representations of angels and of the Blessed Virgin Mary:
Of course, we don’t know who was responsible. It could have been Hindus or Buddhists or Trekkies.
The Central Criminal Intelligence Service (SCRC) of the gendarmerie reported in the spring that an average of nearly three churches per day have been targeted for vandalism over the past three years. In 2018, the Ministry of the Interior recorded 541 anti-Semitic acts, 100 anti-Muslim acts, and 1,063 anti-Christian acts. Just in 2018, 875 French churches were vandalised with crosses and statues being smashed, faeces smeared on the walls and some being set on fire.
But, of course, we all know that the Notre Dame fire was an accident even though on the night of September 3-4 2016, five women who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State parked a car filled with gas cylinders beside Notre Dame and tried to ignite the gas to damage the cathedral.
Swedistan
An analyst at Sweden’s National Bomb Guard has claimed that the growing explosion and bombing phenomenon in the country is not matched by any other industrialised nation.
Analyst Ylva Ehrlin said that between January and October, the southern region of Sweden had seen 71 separate explosions – around one explosion a day – more than double the number from the previous year’s 34 incidents. “We have ten million people in Sweden, but I have not found any equivalent of this level of explosions in any industrialised country,” Ehrlin said.
What? Did the BBC and C4 News ‘forget’ to mention that there was a bomb explosion in Southern Sweden almost every single day?
Meanwhile in Sweden, a Somali asylum-seeker, who has attacked at least 17 women, is being allowed to stay in Sweden as the prosecutor is not even requesting he be sent back to Africa. No doubt he will go on to further enrich Swedish society once he gets permission to remain in Sweden for the rest of his worthless life.
Sadiq-Khanistan
In London a woman accused of planning an ISIS suicide attack at St Paul’s Cathedral appeared in court last week. Safiyya Shaikh, 36, is accused of scoping out the popular tourist site for the best places to blow herself up. She appeared at the Old Bailey wearing a black hijab and Islamic robes via video link from HMP Bronzefield charged with the preparation of terrorist acts and dissemination of terrorist publications
Austria
After the murders of Tugba A. (29 years old) and their children Tuana (23 months old) and Selman (11 months old), relatives came to Bad Vöslau to attend a funeral service. Samet A. (31 y/o) is said to have literally executed first his wife and then his almost two-year-old daughter with a kitchen knife on the 27th of October in his house in Kottingbrunn. Then he is said to have suffocated his son. The Turk is in remand. Tugba A. and her children were laid out on Wednesday in the ATIB mosque in the street Castelligasse for the funeral in Turkey.
Afterwards, the funeral service took place in the house of the victim’s mother. Canan K. was also there with two girlfriends. After the 37-year-old had entered the house, she was attacked by a woman, apparently the cousin of the dead. “Go away, you whore, how dare you show up here without a headscarf,” the attacker is said to have shouted.
The victim of the attack said: “The woman hit me savagely. Then a man spat in my face. Almost 20 Turks came along and attacked us. They also hit my car. I went to the police immediately. From there I was taken with the ambulance to the hospital. I have severe bruises and haematomas on my face.”
Vatican
And in the centre of Christianity, the Vatican, a gentleman apparently from our favourite religion seems to think that a large knife is necessary for visiting St Peters.
What’s depressing is that the guy wasn’t just shot on the spot and instead was handled with kid gloves. I guess the Vatican staff didn’t want to be accused of Izlumophobia:
Our favourite Messiah, Saint Greta the Brainwashed, has a smallish problem. To great fanfare from the BBC and other sycophantic media, Saint Greta the Ignorant voyaged across the Atlantic to preach to us all about non-existent Climate Breakdown.
First major stop was New York where the Great Green Messiah ranted about her whole life being destroyed by something was was just a fiction of her pushy parents’ imagination. But perhaps the most significant incident of Greta patron saint of ecofascists’ visit was when she was totally ignored by Donald Trump:
Seeing her utter fury at not being the centre of attention, one could be forgiven for worrying what will happen to what little is left of this deluded child’s mental health when she is cynically discarded by the ecofascists and goes back to being a total nobody.
Next stop for the Saviour of Mankind was a climate conference due to be held in Santiago, Chile. But the government of President Sebastian Pinerto decided last Wednesday to call it off because of the unrest in the capital. Scores of people have been killed and injured in weeks of rioting over the usual South American corruption, economic inequality, gross mismanagement and social problems
After Chile withdrew, there was concern amongst the 20,000+ freeloading attendees (yes, 20,000+ attendees!!!) that the annual talks might have to be scaled down, postponed or even abandoned. Or the conference could have been replaced by video conferencing. But then everyone would miss their free flights and free hotels and free dinners and chances for loads of environmentally-friendly sex with each other. We can’t let climate change get in the way of that, after all
However, on Friday afternoon, the UN’s top official on climate change, Patricia Espinosa, issued a terse statement that COP25 would go ahead on the original dates, 2-13 December, but in Madrid.
Saint Greta the Deluded’s problem
Greta Thunberg, the Swedish climate activist who sparked the global student strikes, had travelled as far as Los Angeles without flying and was planning to continue to Santiago in time for the conference. On Friday she made a plea for help getting back to Europe in time for the conference. “It turns out I’ve travelled half around the world, the wrong way,”she tweeted. “Now I need to find a way to cross the Atlantic in November … If anyone could help me find transport I would be so grateful.”
DiCrapio to the rescue?
While she was in Los Angeles, Greta the Magnificent had a meeting with that great eco-warrior, Leonardo DiCrapio:
DiCrapio, 44, is famous for once making an 8,000-mile round trip in a private jet from Paris to New York in order to accept an environmentalism award.
Leonardo DiCrapio, one of Hollywood’s leading stars and a prominent environmental campaigner, praised teenage climate change activist Greta Thunberg following their first meeting. Saint Leonardo the Green said that 16-year-old Ms Thunberg’s message should be a “wake-up call to world leaders everywhere that the time for inaction is over” and wrote on Instagram: “There are few times in human history where voices are amplified at such pivotal moments and in such transformational ways -but @GretaThunberg has become a leader of our time”.
Here’s a nice picture. It’s a luxury yacht called Topaz and is (I think) owned by an Arab oil sheikh:
It’s just one of several luxury yachts which I believe was chartered over the years by Saint Leonardo the Eco-warrior, presumably so he can enjoy his hols without coming into contact with worthless plebs like you and I. It looks pretty environmentally-friendly and carbon neutral, don’t you think?
Perhaps DiCrapio could rent this luxury yacht, or a similar one, to get his new best friend for life, Mad Greta the Absurd, to the conference on time?
Or Saint Greta could just go standby on a flight that was flying anyway? That would be the most eco-friendly way of reaching her important 20,000-attendee conference. But then she wouldn’t get all the PR her parents are desperate for. So flying is definitely out.
David Craig, on November 18th, 2019
