David Craig, on February 4th, 2022weekend blog
I’m no statistician, so I might have got this all wrong. But I’ll try to explain it anyway.
The figures below all come from a recent Office for National Statistics (ONS) report which looked at death rates by age group for the vaccinated and unvaccinated:
I’ll start with a summary table:
(left-click on image, then left-click again to see more clearly)
I believe the key column is the one on your right – Age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years.
As you’ll see, for the age group 18-39, the�Age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the unvaccinated at 25.6 is much lower than the�Age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for three of the four groups which have had either one or two vaccinations – 65.6, 47 and 55.2.
On the other hand, the�Age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the 40-49 age group is almost twice as high for the unvaccinated (221) than for the vaccinated (average – 115).
And in the 50-59 age group, the�Age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the unvaccinated (717.2) is about three times higher than for the vaccinated (average – 239).
If I have understood the figures correctly, there seems to be a pattern emerging – the older the age group, the more beneficial the vaccines are. And in the 18-39 age group, the vaccines seem to be doing more harm than good.
But what about our children?
Please bear with me a little longer. Now we come to the next bit of this puzzle. A slightly non-establishment website has calculated the�Age-standardised mortality rate per 100,000 person-years for the 10-14 and 15-19 age groups:
https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/29/ons-data-covid-vaccinated-children-52x-more-likely-to-die/
I struggled a little trying to follow their calculations. Moreover, the sample sizes of those children who died were possibly too small to be statistically significant. I wouldn’t know. But here’s their conclusion:
(left-click on image, then left-click again to see more clearly)
This suggests that for the younger age groups, vaccination may actually be doing much more harm than good.
Who can we trust?
But can we trust a ‘conspiracy’ website? After all, when the whole scientific community condemned any suggestion that the Chinese Wuhan plague was accidentally released from a Chinese military bioweapons programme funded in part by Dr Anthony Fauci, we all knew the scientists were right and the conspiracy theorists were crazy. Didn’t we?
So here are some other data points:
- When formulating advice in relation to childhood immunisations,�JCVI�(Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation) has consistently held that the main focus of its considerations should be the potential benefits and harms of vaccination to children and young people themselves. The JCVI has stated that benefits and risks from COVID-19 vaccination in children and young people are finely balanced largely because the risks associated with SARS-CoV2 infection are very low. Of all age groups, children aged 5 to 11 years are those at lowest risks of serious COVID-19
- The JCVI have therefore recommended that only children in high-risk groups should be vaccinated: �Children aged 5 to 11 years in a clinical risk group (as defined in the Green Book), or who are a household contact of someone who is immunosuppressed (as defined in the Green Book), should be offered two 10 micrograms doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (Comirnaty�) with an interval of 8 weeks between the first and second doses. The minimum interval between any vaccine dose and recent COVID19 infection should be 4 weeks.�
- Vaccination with mRNA-1273 was associated with a significantly increased risk of myocarditis or myopericarditis in the Danish population, primarily driven by an increased risk among individuals aged 12-39 years
But still our great knowledgeable rulers, those who assure us that man-made climate change will wipe out the human race, press ahead with their ‘vaccinate the children’ campaigns.
Various countries are now recognising that the vaccines are next to useless more than nine months after vaccination. For example, the French have declared that people are only fully vaccinated after nine months if they have had a booster shot. And I believe the Israelis are now into their fourth round of vaccinations – the two initial vaccinations plus two booster shots.
While the evidence suggests that the vaccines have been effective for older age groups, it would possibly be useful if our scientific experts were to look again at whether it is wise vaccinating our children.�Even worse, with the emergence of the less deadly flu-like Omicron variant, I get the feeling that anyone in good health below the age of say forty, shouldn’t risk vaccination at all.
But that won’t happen as vaccinations have become an issue of political control rather than a pure health issue and our politicians don’t dare allow any doubts to be raised about their coercive vaccination campaigns.
After all, what would happen to the vaccination campaigns if people started to look at the benefits vs the risks? A complete collapse in confidence.
Meanwhile the vaccine manufacturers work to have their vaccines approved for ever younger age groups, the mainstream media continue to promote the ‘vaccinate vaccinate vaccinate’ propaganda and anyone questioning the benefits of mass vaccination gets immediately cancelled by social media for being a right-wing, anti-vaxxer nutjob.
I’ll just add a recommendation to have a look at the Zerohedge article mentioned in a reader’s comment:
It seems that US life insurance companies have noticed a significant rise in deaths of younger people in the fourth quarter of 2021. This rise in deaths of younger people coincided with Covid becoming less virulent but vaccination becoming more widespread due to ‘no jab no job’ vaccine mandates. This rise in deaths could be due to delayed medical procedures from Covid filling up hospitals or it could be the miracle vaccines. You decide.
Category: 
Two sites of interest:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/researcher-calls-out-censorship-after-journal-pulls-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-events-analysis_4221081.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge
https://www.theepochtimes.com/fda-document-on-moderna-vaccine-approval-removed-from-agencys-website_4254453.html
A few key observations:
� Mortality worsened in 2021 vs. 2020 despite widespread vaccinations
� A spike in Mortality among�younger, working-age individuals coincided with vaccine mandates
� The spike in younger deaths peaked in Q3 2021 when Covid deaths were extremely low (but rising into the end of September)
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/long-funeral-homes-short-life-insurers-ex-blackrock-fund-manager-discovers-some-disturbing
There are endless reports of the harm being done by vaccines and concerns about deaths. Some looking at the VAERS system point out that there has been a significant increase in reports since the Covid vaccines arrived and the system underreports. This has resulted in adjustments to the data and conclusions of 100,000’s of deaths in America. You ask the question who can we trust and the answer, I think, is not many.
The one person I trust, and I am sure I have recommended him is Prof Norman Fenton. His website is easy to find and there are many reports. I have just checked and briefly looked at some new reports, but the message seems to be the same. He has been looking at the effectiveness of the vaccines and discusses some detailed issues, but his final conclusion is: “the ONS data provide no reliable evidence that the vaccine
reduces all-cause mortality”. The reason he is not more specific is that the data is so unreliable. I’m not sure that that his conclusion also means that the vaccines do not increase all-cause mortality.
I think Fenton would object to your analysis because one of the issues he raises is what is the definition of a vaccinated person. It is now even worse because some say that to be fully vaccinated a booster is required. He is also concerned about what constitutes a Covid death.
I have seen reports about Canada by Denis Rancourt claiming there has been no Covid pandemic but there are extra male deaths from the response to Covid. The life insurance companies’ response is also interesting but let us remember that they are more interested in money.
An issue that is never is rarely discussed is consent. We always give consent for operations, and we are told the risks and benefits. When we are prescribed drugs, we always get a leaflet with them and can decide whether we want to take them. I had the flu vaccination at a chemist last year and I was given a leaflet, after the injection, with the risks. We are never usually told about the risks of vaccinations and this cannot be acceptable. It is too late to be conducting analysis of deaths and incidents at this stage. This is what trials are for and they were not adequate, and the vaccines should never have been given emergency approval. We should be demanding a statement of risk with all vaccines to read before we have them. It says a lot about the NHS (and the government) that they don’t see any need to provide the risks.
I found this article: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-vaccines-weve-been-misled-from-the-very-start/
which discusses the flu vaccine. I have accepted the flu vaccine to be beneficially but have been looking into it and I cannot see any evidence about its benefits, especially for the elderly. The two vaccines appear to be a money-making racket. Vaccines are supposed to prevent us getting the disease, but for respiratory diseases they do not work. That should be clear to everybody by now.
One final point about the events reporting system is that it is also obvious that there are more events with certain batches. I suspect this is because so many new manufacturing companies have been set up with no experience and the quality control is not adequate. This needs to be investigated.
The threats to previous civilisations that became fatal to them were all-too real. The threats to the western nations are all false. Are all-too unreal and waged by their own people against their own people. A huge difference. Concerted principled leadership by people of integrity instead of the concerted falsifications by the falsifiers could turn things around in the diseased nations, but it is almost impossible to see how that could come about. The disease has gone past the point of no return. Mother nature will sort all of the unnatural phenomena out slowly but surely, because it is unsustainable, but it is going to be a very painful business.
Just remember what Dostoyevsky wrote: “Suffering is the sole cause of consciousness.” The European nations, which underwent non-stop wars and crises for millennia, are the most creative collective by a very long way. So, maybe this is all going to develop into a much higher state of consciousness and creativity.