I obviously haven’t read the inquiry report released yesterday, a full seven years after the fire. But from the press reports I’ve seen, it doesn’t appear to be the usual establishment cover-up ending with the usual “important lessons have been learnt“. Apparently, the inquiry report actually exposes the guilty. Nevertheless, it seems that our wonderful plods, who can prosecute and imprison within a couple of days anyone who dares criticise Two-Tier Keir’s open-borders illegal migration free-for-all, will need another two to three years before they can even think about possibly beggining to prosecute anyone involved in the Grenfell disaster despite having a 1,700-page report to help them.
Moreover, as I explained in my blog written in 2017 and repeated on Wednesday this week, after the fire Labour tried to pin the disaster on evil Tory austerity imposed by Cameron and Osborne. After the Grenfell Tower fire disaster, Labour (as usual eagerly supported by the libtards at the BBC and Channel 4 News) were quick to build a narrative that went something like this – in London’s richest borough (Kensington and Chelsea) a Tory council, that didn’t care about housing for the poor, and Tory austerity cuts were responsible for the Grenfell deaths or “Grenfell murders” as Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell so elegantly put it during his Glastonbury speech to the politically-correct idiots at the music festival.
But, in fact, the tower was run by the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO) an organisation set up under Labour government legislation, majority controlled by elected tenants and which had (if I remember correctly) the person who would go on to become the Labour MP as one of the 3 appointed Councillor members (from 2008 to 2012). The refurbishment, including installation of the rather inflammable cladding and decision not to spend £135,000 to instal sprinklers, which took place in (I think) 2014-2016, would therefore probably have been planned and negotiated while this Labour councillor and later MP was on the KCTMO.
Gaslighting us again and again and again
We all know now that we were lied to about:
the utter nonsense of human-produced CO2 causing climate change
the need for the economically-suicidal Net Zero
the origin and actual effects of the US funded, Chinese lab-leaked pandemic
the dubious safety and effectiveness of the ‘miracle vaccines’
the very limited group of people who got any benefits from the fake vaccines
the reasons for increased death rates in the most highly-vaccinated countries
how our rulers provoked the Ukraine invasion by ignoring Putin’s threat that he would not accept Ukraine joining NATO
and much much more
The latest mainstream media gaslighting campaign to fool us seems to be the rush by the media to deify the (IMHO) useless and incomprehsible word salad machine – aka Kamala Harris.
Here’s just one blatant example from a US news platform called ‘Axios’
Axios informs us on its website that: “We launched Axios in January 2017 based on this shared belief: The world needed smarter, more efficient coverage of the topics shaping the fast-changing world. We pledged to put our audience first, always.”
“We met our promise and offered an antidote to this madness. Now, we are focusing our minds and manpower on a much bigger problem faced by all consumers: the erosion of truth, trust, safety and sanity in news. This is an existential threat to our democracy. It will require extraordinary effort by us and others to correct.”
“We will go the extra mile to earn your trust. All employees are asked to refrain from taking/advocating for public positions on political topics.”
Axios, like most of the mainstream media, previously reported on April 14 & March 24, 2021 that Kamala Harris was appointed as Border Czar:
You might remember an excruciating interview from 2021 in which the great Kamala was asked if she had visited the border for which she was now responsible. Harris’s reply was “I haven’t been to Europe” an answer comprehensible to only one person on this planet – Kamala Harris herself.
Now that Kamala Harris is the Democratic candidate for president, the mainstream media is quickly rewriting history. For example, now the very same Axios (like the rest of the mainstream Trump-hating media) claims that Kamala Harris was never appointed as Border Czar and it’s only the evil Trump and Republicans who are claiming that Harris was the Border Czar:
Will voters really fall for this cr*p yet again and again and again?
Cackling Kamala – our next world leader?
And here, to cheer us up, is Tucker Carlson talking to a Kamala Harris impersonator:
Some report by the usual lawyer freeloaders who always make millions from such reports about the Grenfell Tower disaster gets published today (Wednesday 4 September). I doubt we will ever be given the truth as I suspect that politics and political correctness will prevent any real investigation.
Anyway, here’s what I wrote about the disaster in June 2017:
After the Grenfell Tower fire disaster, Labour (as usual eagerly supported by the libtards at the BBC and Channel 4 News) were quick to build a narrative that went something like this – in London’s richest borough (Kensington and Chelsea) a Tory council, that didn’t care about housing for the poor, and Tory austerity cuts were responsible for the Grenfell deaths or “Grenfell murders” as Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, John McDonnell so elegantly put it during his Glastonbury speech to the politically-correct idiots at the music festival. And, of course, London’s Labour Mayor, Sadiq Khan, is busy scoring political points by insisting that commissioners be sent in to run Tory-controlled Kensington and Chelsea council.
So, in this blog, I’ll try to put forward a few facts which may paint a very different picture to the one Corbyn and McDonnell and Khan and Laura Kuensberg and Jon Snow and Cathy Newman and Krishnan WhateverHisName etc seem so keen to sell to us.
Here are possibly 6 of the most important facts:
1. The Tory council was not responsible
The block of flats was run not by the Council, but by Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO).
In the early 1990s, the tenants and leaseholders of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea decided to pursue their legal right to manage their own homes. Following two separate ballots in 1994 and 1995, the KCTMO was established on 1 April 1996 and the responsibility for managing 9,760 properties passed from The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea to the KCTMO.
The Council still owns the properties and retains responsibility for strategic housing policies and homeless people. The relationship between KCTMO and the Council is governed by a Management Agreement, which covers all areas of the landlord business. Whilst KCTMO still enjoys a close working relationship with the Council, it is a completely separate company.
In 2002 KCTMO took over the responsibility for major capital works from the Council to access extra resources and funding to enable KCTMO to bring the properties up to the Decent Homes Standard.
KCTMO is managed by a Board of Directors comprising of 8 elected tenant and leaseholder members, 4 appointed Councillor members and 3 independent appointed other members.
Shall I repeat that?
KCTMO is managed by a Board of Directors comprising of 8 elected tenant and leaseholder members, 4 appointed Councillor members and 3 independent appointed other members. This means that the majority of people running the KCTMO accused of “not listening to tenants” were tenants and/or leaseholders!!!!!
So, if Labour or Corbyn or John McDonnell or Khan and the BBC and Channel 4 News are looking for their “Grenfell Tower murderers”, they can find them among the people responsible for running the KCTMO and not the Council.
When the much-maligned head of the Council stated something like “the tenants didn’t want the disruption of installing sprinklers” he was probably correct in that it would have been the KCTMO, majority run by tenants (and not the Council), that took the decision not to spend an additional £138k on fitting sprinklers when the building had a £8m+ refurbishment in (I think) 2014-2016.
Of course, the Council’s response to the fire was dismal. Probably most of the councillors are pompous, self-important, self-serving, verbally-flatulent, incompetent buffoons (as are most people serving on councils – Labour, Tory and LibDems). But legally and morally, responsibility for management of social housing lay with the KCTMO and had the Council tried to interfere with the KCTMO’s work, there would have been the usual lefty libtard howls of outrage against the supposed privileged ruling classes denying council tenants the right to manage their own homes (as defined by the law – see point 2 below).
2. Labour introduced the legislation empowering tenant management organisations
The laws laying down the rights of tenants to create Arms Length Management Organisations (ALMO) such as the KCTMO were made under the Right To Manage legislation passed in 2002 as part of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act.
This was put in place to give leaseholders and tenants stronger and well-defined legal rights to a greater say and the ability to self manage (which in some circumstances has clearly proven to be flawed).
Who was in a charge when this law was passed? It was Blair’s New Labour.
Moreover, as far as I understand, many of the buildings now being found dangerous – due to flammable cladding, defective fire doors, inadequate sprinklers etc – (such as the Chalcott Estate high rises re-clad in 2006) were refurbished during Blair and Brown’s period in power from 1997 to 2010, not during supposed “Tory austerity”.
3. A Labour MP’s position
The Labour MP has been one of the most vocal critics of the Council and made her maiden speech in the Commons about the Grenfell Tower fire. The MP has accused Tory-led Kensington and Chelsea Council of failures that led to the blaze, claiming “poor-quality materials and construction standards have played a part in this hideous and unforgivable event”.
But as a councillor (since May 2006) I believe that this Labour MP was on Kensington and Chelsea’s Housing and Property Scrutiny Committee, which oversees “community safety issues”, until May 2014. A 2014/15 report, in which (if I remember correctly) she is named, says the committee scrutinised work on Grenfell Tower. Moreover, this Labour MP has been active in deciding building matters for many years as she was also, I believe, on the Council’s Major Planning Development Committee
Furthermore, guess who was one of the 3 appointed Councillor members (from 2008 to 2012) of the KCTMO, that was responsible for the building works and accused of “not listening to tenants”. If my memory serves me correctly it was none other than the Labour MP and former Labour councillor for many years.
Ooops!
Of course, I am absolutely not suggesting that this Labour MP has any responsibility for the Grenfell Tower disaster.
4. Was the building a Third-World slum?
Apparently there was only one stairwell down which people could escape. But were residents prevented from getting down the stairwell and through corridors due to burning piles of rubbish left by residents themselves?
If so, we can be sure that political correctness will prevent this fact ever coming out.
Residents had apparently been complaining about the rubbish for some time, but it was the KCTMO (where, you will hopefully remember, a majority of directors were residents) that was responsible for rubbish clearance.
Furthermore, I wonder how many people were living illegally in Grenfell Tower were some supposed tenants actually making a few quid renting out their council flats while living somewhere else.
5. Labour are responsible for the ‘under-funded’ London Fire Service
London’s Mayor, Sadiq Khan has made lots of political capital by claiming that London’s Fire Service was underfunded and that the Fire Service’s advice for people to stay put was responsible for so many deaths.
But who is in overall charge of London’s fire service? Labour London Mayor Sadiq Khan!
Moreover, Sadiq Khan as mayor of London produced a report to say that the fire service did not need further funding. And I suspect Mr Khan has been extraordinarily generous with taxpayers’ money when it comes to funding Religion of Peace community groups giving them millions that could have been spent on better equipment for the London Fire Service. Moreover, I seem to remember that just after being elected Khan spent several hundred thousand pounds of London taxpayers’ money setting up a special police unit to investigate ‘hate crimes’ and ‘hate speech’. Perhaps Mr Khan’s priorities were slightly misplaced?
Anyway, guess who is a member of Mayor Khan’s London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority – surprise surprise, as far as I remember ……………….. (censored for legal reasons)
Ooops and double ooops!
6. The role of EU environmental regulations
When the Grenfell Tower was built, the cladding materials were glass-based and inert. Fire could not pass through or behind the cladding. Since then, authority for specification of construction materials has passed from individual governments to the EU. The EU has decreed, as part of climate change initiatives, that the main purpose of cladding is to provide insulation, thus reducing the need to burn fuel. When, three years ago, the tenant-run KCTMO spent £8m+ on up-grading the Grenfell Tower, it had no option but to use cladding permitted by the EU.
What we don’t yet know is whether flammable or non-flammable cladding was specified in the KCTMO’s refurbishment contract and who specified the flammable cladding. But it is possible that a flammable cladding was used as it was seen to have better insulation properties and thus be more environmentally friendly than the non-flammable version. Hopefully the inquiry will shed light on why the KCTMO chose flammable cladding. But I’m doubtful.
Conclusion
Looking at the above facts, I humbly suggest that political correctness will prevent the truth about Grenfell Tower coming out.
And what is that truth?
The tenants’ organisation (KCTMO), accused of “not listening to tenants”, was operating under laws passed by Labour to give greater control to tenants
The tenants had majority control over the KCTMO which was accused of “not listening to tenants”
The KCTMO (not the Council) was responsible for the refurbishment during which it was decided not to install sprinklers
(Censored for legal reasons)
Many similarly dangerous refurbishments were done in Labour councils under the New Labour government
Labour London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, was responsible for the fire service that he criticises so much
It may have been piles of rubbish left by residents which helped spread the fire and blocked residents’ escape routes
It may have been EU environmental rules which led to the replacement of the previous non-flammable cladding to more flammable, supposedly environmentally-better more flammable cladding
But I doubt the lefties and libtards in politics and the media will allow anything like the truth to intrude on their “we hate the Tories” and “the tenants are victims of the cruel Tory council” and “everything the EU does is wonderful” version of events
A few days ago, I came across this rather jolly article. It apparently appeared in Country Squire magazine. This is not a publication I normally read. But I thought this piece worth mentioning. Left-click on the image or the headline below to see the full article:
I almost missed this story because of the headline. The headline read: “Man assulted 3 Asian women he berated for their appearance”. The headline should have been: “Asian man assaulted 3 Asian women he berated for their appearance”.
Here’s what was reported: “A man berated three women “prostitutes” for not wearing traditional Asian dress and putting on make-up, then violently attacked them, a court heard. Muhammad Hassan, 26, assaulted the victims after spotting them at a petrol station in Bradford.
In a 51-second attack captured on CCTV, Hassan grabbed the driver and slammed her head on to the dashboard of her vehicle. He then grabbed another woman’s hair and punched her in the head before hitting the third woman.”
You’ll remember that our Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, a (IMHO) sanctimonious, finger-wagging, killjoy who always looks like she has just swallowed a bucket full of wasps, has declared that she wanted to make misogyny a crime on the same level as terrorism. So, what punishment do you think misogynist multi-culturally-enriching Muhammad Hassan got? A few years in prison? Or even a lot of years in prison? After all, he slammed one woman’s head on the dashboard of her vehicle, punched another woman and hit the third. Yup, you guessed it. Three months after the unprovoked attack on the 3 women Muhammad Hassan from Bradford, was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for two years. He also got 35 rehabilitation activities, 180 hours of unpaid work, electronic tagging for four months and £500 costs.
Imagine if a white man – particularly a white working-class man, the kind of person that our useless PM calls “a racist” and “a right-wing thug” – had attacked 3 Asian women in this way. He’d have been locked up within hours and they’d have thrown away the key. But when it’s a multi-cultural enricher, it takes months for the case to come to trial and there is almost no effort to punish the offender.
Come on Two-Tier Keir and misogynist-hating Cooper, please explain to us how this isn’t two-tier policing and a two-tier justice system – excessive and immediate punishments for white British and long delays and excuses instead of punishment for multi-cultural enrichers.
By the way, Keir and Cooper, when will the two multi-cultural enrichers who attacked police at Manchester Airport be arrested and punished? I won’t be holding my breath.
I’m embarrassed to admit that I watched all of KIm Jong Keir’s speech in the Downing Street Rose Garden and the following journalists’ questions. This wasn’t intentional. I was in my gym with GB News on in the background when Starmer did his ‘blame-the-evil-Tories’ rant.
I won’t bother going into all the lies Keir Starmer, who promised us honesty and integrity in government, spouted. They have probably been covered in detail by some of the media though no doubt the Guardian hailed Starmer’s garbage as the greatest piece of statesmanship ever witnessed. What I found more interesting than Starmer’s flatulent, humourless blethering were the questions asked, and more importantly not asked, by the attendant supposed ‘journalists’. This was a chance for our courageous, truth-seeking journalists to really grill Starmer on all the pre-election promises he had already broken and about the logical inconsistency of Labour’s economically-suicidal policies. But our ‘journalists’ wasted the opportunity and gave Starmer such a sycophantically easy ride than one journalist even asked how Starmer felt about the group Oasis announcing their comeback while he was prime minister. Pathetic. Worse than pathetic.
Here are just a few of the subjects to which I believe the British public wanted answers and which weren’t even mentioned by our fake, lickspittle ‘journalists’
Mass, open-borders immigration:
What hasn’t Starmer found anyone willing to take the top job at his wonderful new Border Command?
When would the number of illegal Channel crossings start to fall?
Why were Starmer and Cooper giving an amnesty to almost 100,000 illegal migrants, 95% of whom were young men of military age?
Wouldn’t this amnesty just encourage hundreds of thousands more illegal migrants to invade Britain?
How could Starmer justify scrapping the winter fuel allowance for British pensioners and planning to massively increase taxes on British citizens while wasting £8bn+ a year on hotels and free stuff for illegal migrants?
How many “evil people-smuggling gangs” had Starmer and Cooper managed to “smash”?
Why can’t Labour move all illegal migrants out of hotels and into internment camps with minimum non-halal rations until they agree to go back to the countries they came from?
But unfortunately for us not one of the ‘journalists’ felt that mass, open-borders, illegal, Third-world immigration was a subject worth mentioning
Economically-suicidal Net Zero:
Why are Starmer and eco-crazy MIliband claiming that stopping all oil and gas exploration in the North Sea will improve Britain’s energy security when it’s obvious Miliband’s ban on new exploration licences will make us more dependent on other countries for our energy?
Why are Starmer and eco-buffoon Miliband claiming that moving from cheap, reliable oil and gas to expensive, unreliable and intermittent wind and solar will reduce our energy costs when it’s blindingly obvious that the move to renewables will massively increase (more than double?) energy costs?
Don’t Starmer and eco-clown MIliband realise that by forcing up Britain’s energy costs, which are already among the most expensive in the world, they are damaging British industry’s competitiveness, destroying British jobs and making any chance of economic growth a fantasy?
But unfortunately for us not one of the ‘journalists’ felt that economically-suicidal Net Zero was a subject worth mentioning
Two-Tier policing:
Why have so many of those involved in the anti-immigration riots been arrested, charged and imprisoned when there seems to have been no action against those involved in the Leeds Harehills Roma riots nor those involved in the East London Bangladeshi riots?
When are the two multi-cultural enrichers filmed attacking police at Manchester Airport going to be arrested, charged and imprisoned?
Doens’t Two-Tier Keir feel that the failure to treat multi-cultural enrichers with the ‘full force of the law’ while brutally cracking down on any white British protestors could give the impression of two-tier policing?
But unfortunately for us not one of the ‘journalists’ felt that two-tier policing was a subject worth mentioning
Freebies for multi-millionaire Keir at a time when he was increasing taxes on the rest of us:
Were the suit Starmer was wearing and his glasses part of a reported £20,000 gift of new clothes and glasses from a Labour crony?
Does Starmer feel that it is appropriate for someone as priviliged and well-paid as him to pocket a reported £20,000 present while crushing the rest of us with reduced benefits for pensioners and increased taxes?
Wouldn’t it have been better if Starmer had donated the £20,000 to a food bank or charity for those who would be impoverished by Starmer’s benefits cuts and increased taxes?
Was Starmer being somewhat hypocritical accusing the Tories of abusing their power by holding a party in the Rose Garden during the fake-demic lockdown when only a couple of weeks earlier Starmer had allowed a major donor to Labour to hold a party in the same Rose Garden?
But unfortunately for us not one of the ‘journalists’ felt that Starmer’s greed, selfishness and hypocrisy were subjects worth mentioning
When I wrote my Saturday blog, I knew that the Solingen (Germany) murderer was an Arab-looking man who, some witnesses claimed, shouted something about his “snackbar” as he stabbed people attending a Diversity Festival. But I was afraid to mention this as there was a risk that Yvette ‘Jackboot’ Cooper’s uniformed thugs might come calling and haul me off for supposedly ‘inciting racial hatred’ or something like that.
About 80 years ago, the German state annihilated several million of their own citizens, who were talented, hard working and peaceful people and assimilated quite happily into German society. Then, in order to compensate for this, in recent years they imported several million largely hostile and often violent and dangerous people who have a strong sense of entitlement, a grudge against their hosts and no intention of assimilating into German society. Oh and the invaders also hate the few surviving victims of the events 80 years ago. And now the Germans are shocked, absolutely shocked and surprised that they are being slaughtered by the invading Islamic hordes:
Chancellor Olaf Scholz bleated: “An attacker brutally killed several people… We mourn the victims and stand by their families.” Mario Voigt, head of the Thüringen CDU, spouted similar empty crocodile tears: “The terrible news of the terrorist attack in Solingen has left people… standing together in grief and sympathy… I mourn with the families and loved ones of the victims who were senselessly torn from their lives.” Ricarda Lang, co-head of the Green Party, joined in the fake sympathy: “Horrific news from Solingen, where people just wanted to celebrate and were brutally murdered. My thoughts and sympathy are with the victims and their families…” And German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser joined the chorus of hypocrisy: “We are deeply shocked by the brutal attack… We mourn for the people who were taken from life in a terrible way. My thoughts are with the families of those killed and those seriously injured.”
So many crocodile tears from the German elites, who encouraged millions of West-hating Third-Worlders to invade their country, that it’s surprising a few people didn’t drown in the flood.
Oh, and I almost forgot. There were a few stabbings at the diverse, vibrant Notting Hill carnival. If anybody dies, no doubt our rulers will express their surprise and shock and no doubt their ‘thoughts and prayers’ will be with the families of those murdered and we will all ‘stand together as a community‘ and much more garbage of that ilk
No quick fixes?
Our great leader Keir Jong Starmer will be giving a speech this week in which he’ll warn us that things will get worse before they get better because there are no quick fixes. Well, Kim Jong Keir, here are a few ideas:
Cut the number of politicians in the House of Commons from 650 to 300 at most and hold new elections
Cut the House of Lords from over 800 to just 100 senators elected by proportional representation
Cut the BBC’s budget by half and use the £1.5bn+ to reinstate the winter fuel payments for pensioners
Scrap Net Zero, the absurd, economically-suicidal Climate Change Act and all subsidies for useless and unreliable supposed ‘renewable’ energy cutting energy costs for households and businesses by more than 20% and thus making what little is left of UK manufacturing much more internationally competitive. I know this will come as a surprise to KIm Jong Keir and eco-fool Ed Miliband, but there is a rumour that competitive companies create jobs and growth while crushing companies with the world’s highest energy prices bankrupts companies and destroys jobs leading to economic contraction
And while we’re on the subject of the waste-of-skin Commie eco-idiot, Ed Miliband, fire the eco-buffoon and encourage oil companies to apply for exploration licences in the North Sea
Fire all DIE (Diversity, Inclusion and Equality) staff throughout the public sector saving over £300 million a year
As of March 2024, there were 510,665 full-time equivalent (FTE) civil servants. There are now 22,175 (4.5%) more civil servants than a year ago. Fire at least 50,000 civil servants saving around £5bn
Move all illegal migrants into detention centres with minimum facilities as an encouragement to leave the UK saving a couple of billion of hotel costs
Send out the navy and coastguards to turn back all small boats heading to Britain thus preventing more than 50,000 illegals coming to the UK every year
Impose a maximum salary for university vice chancellors, council bosses, BBC ‘stars’ and senior civil servants at £30,000 below the salary for the Prime Minister
That took me a couple of minutes. Surely Kim Jong Starmer, with all his highly-paid advisers, could come up with a few more?
By the way, hopefully you’ll have noticed that the above list are all things the worse than useless fake Tories could and should have done during their 14 years in power. Moreover, had the LibDems pretending to be Tories done these things they’d probably still be in power.
One has to very careful about what one writes nowadays otherwise Yvette ‘Jackboot’ Cooper’s uniformed thugs will come calling. But I was somewhat surprised that a knifeman in Solingen (Germany) could stab 3 people to death and injure 8 others (5 seriously) in the middle of a crowd and we’re expected to believe the BBC and the rest of the mainstream media that nobody saw anything and nobody was able to give a description of the attacker. I suspect that, had the attacker been a blond Aryan of German origin, we’d have quickly had a rather detailed description of the man. I wonder how the German police are going to catch the attacker if nobody knows what he looks like?
How very strange. What could it all mean?
Moreover, self-censored self-censored self-censored self-censored self-censored self-censored self-censored self-censored self-censored. Yet the German police and the media have absolutely no idea about the possible motive for the attacks. If this had happened in Britain, we’d probably be told the attacker was “a right-wing thug”. But being Germany, I guess we’ll be told the attacker is a member of the ‘right-wing’ Alternativ fur Deutschland or maybe we’ll just be fobbed off with the usual “mental health issues”.
The luxury yacht sinking
Obviously there has been much speculation about why entrepreneur Mike Lynch’s yacht sank in a storm off Italy while other boats weren’t harmed. One possibility, which the chattering ‘experts’ don’t seem to have considered is that the yacht might have put down two anchors – one at the front and one at the stern. Normally, when you anchor around other boats in a bay, you put down one anchor so that, if the wind shifts during the night, all the boats move the same way. You frequently find that, while almost all boats put down one anchor, there’s some idiot who puts down two. So, when the boats move during the night, they find all their anchor chains tangled up with each other and a couple of hours is spent the next morning untangling the mess. The other advantage of just one anchor is that each boat will always move so it is bow on to the wind. But if some dolt puts down two anchors, then the boat might find the wind coming from the port or starboard side risking a capsize should the wind reach storm force.
I’ve obviously no idea whether this may be what happened. But it’s something the ‘experts’ might consider.
In my previous blog, I featured this image from a tweet sent out by Yvette ‘Trotsky’ Cooper’s Home Office:
Unfortunately, I didn’t know how to copy the whole tweet. I still haven’t worked it out. But someone else has. So here’s a more complete version:
The key problems with the tweet are the words: “These criminals will face the full force of the law”
Until Two-Tier Keir’s bunch of UK-hating communists took power, a basic principle of UK law was that one is innocent until proven guilty. From what I understand, about 100 of those considered to be “right-wing thugs” and those considered to have incited anti-immigrant violence with online comments have been convicted and imprisoned in order to browbeat the rest of us into servile compliance with our government’s increasingly hostile censorship of free speech. Thus only about 10% of the “more than 1,000 arrests related to recent public disorder” have actually been found guilty of a criminal offence. Yet Yvette ‘Trotsky’ Cooper’s Home Office have already branded the more than 1,000 arrested as “criminals”.
Apparently millions of people have seen the Home Office tweet. I wonder if the 900+ who haven’t yet been convicted of anything could use Yvette ‘Trotsky” Coopers’s Home Office tweet already condemning them as “criminals” as grounds for claiming that they can now no longer expect a fair trial and therefore their cases should be dismissed? That would be more than amusing.
Please note that in Two-Tier Keir’s justice system, the Home Office’s phrase “recent public disorder” only refers to anti-immigration protests by white British. Those involved in the BLM riots, the Sarah Everard vigil, the Leeds Harehills riots, the London Bangladeshi riots and the multi-cultural enrichers from Crapistan attacking police at Manchester Airport are, apparently, considered by our useless, worthless police as not being engaged in “public disorder”.
However, maybe this is just the beginning. Soon, under Yvette ‘Trotsky’ Cooper’s Stasi, everyone charged with misogyny will be convicted as terrorists. After that, how about ‘climate deniers’? People like myself who wrote the book There is no climate crisis? Will we also be convicted of terrorism or mass murder or genocide? Probably.
Welcome to the future. Welcome to ‘Back to the future’:
Thus is apparently an image sent out in a recent tweet by the fragrant Yvette Cooper’s utterly incompetent and congenitally useless Home Office:
I imagine the aim is to terrify us all into silence so we don’t dare mention any qualms about our government’s enthusiasm for importing the Third World and making White British a minority in our own country.
Meanwhile, thousands of real criminals – muggers, burglars, thieves, drug dealers and who knows what else are being released from prison early in order to make space in our overcrowded prisons for anyone foolish enough to be guilty of ‘wrongthink’ or ‘wrongspeak’ about open-borders, unlimited immigration.
120,000 criminals – no arrests
And here’s the message we’re sending to the hundreds of millions of young men in the Third World who quite fancy a relaxing and comfortable life living off benefits and crime in the UK while (it seems to me from the experience of the last 20+years) being allowed to have fun sexually abusing and raping as many underage white girls as they wish:
Labour should perhaps be congratulated for doing more damage to Britain in just a few weeks as the worthless, lying, bungling, expenses-thieving, UK-hating Tories managed in 14 years.
Oh, and here’s our greart leader, Two-Tier Keir, at Davos. I wonder what he was discussing there and whether he was there representing our interests, or his own?
First I thought it mentioning a complaint I have just sent to the BBC. The complaint is fairly self-explanatory. I’m interested to see how the BBC fobs me off by insisting on its supposed ‘impartiality’ while actually telling me to Foxtrot Oscar.
Here’s my complaint: Your presenter (gleefully?) reported that an Israeli attack has (according to Hamas) killed 14 or 15 Gazans. Yet on the same day Jihadi terrorists in the Democratic Republic of the Congo slaughtered 16 villagers and injured 20 others; Jihadi terrorists in Peshawar Pakistan shot two police; Al Qaeda in Yemen murdered 16 innocents and injured 24 more and Islamic Janjaweed in Sudan murdered 6 civilians. Why did the BBC so enthusiastically reportthe 14 or 15 Gazans allegedly killed by the Israelis and yet say nothing about 40 innocents murdered the same day by Islamic terrorist groups?
Moreover, why did the BBC make no mention of the 102 murdered by Islamic terrorists the previous dayin Mali, Sudan, Bangladesh and Pakistan? Is it BBC policy to report every death claimed by Hamas in order to discredit Israel but to cover up all slaughters caused by Islamic terrorism?
Why are we giving illegals free ferry services to the UK?
You might have wondered why our incredibly brave and (IMHO) Uk-hating Border Farce and equally brave and (IMHO) UK-hating RNLI spend so much time and resources cruising British territorial waters in the Channel to give free ferry services to the UK to all the illegal migrants so helpfully escorted in safety out of French waters by French patrol boats.
I have seen one theory floating around the Internet which may or may not be true. According to this theory, if we were to allow the migrant boats to reach British shores, then the migrants would be committing a crime by coming to the UK illegally. This would then oblige the police to intervene and arrest the migrants for breaking the law. However, if the migrants are ‘rescued’ from the supposedly ‘dangerous’ Channel by the courageous Border Farce and RNLI (IMHO) fake charity, then they are being brought to Britain legally and thus, having been supposedly ‘rescued’ from the cruel sea, they deserve to be housed in comfortable hotels with three meals a day (often Halal, of course), new smartphones and lots of pocket money.
This may or may not be true. I’ll leave you to judge. Not that it really matters as our elites are determined to allow the small boat invasion bringing young Third-world men of military age to Britain to continue until we deplorable white British are a minority in our own country.
Hey Yvette, here’s a misogynist terrorist for you to arrest
Rather than dealing with thorny issues such as burglaries, muggings, illegal migrants, knifings and so on, our brave Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, has decided to try to deflect our attention from real crimes affecting most of our lives by rebranding unpleasant behaviour – misogyny – as some kind of terrorist offence. At least that’s what little I can be bothered to understand.
Anyway, being a strong supporter of law and order, I attach the short video below featuring a gentleman on a bus somewhere in the UK (I don’t know where) indulging in an act that looks to me to be rather misogynistic. Perhaps Yvette could get some of the plods actively scouring the Internet to identify and punish anyone daring to criticise our rulers’ policies of mass, open-borders immigration to check out the video below, identify the bus company, find the gentleman and arrest him?
There’s just one small problem. I haven’t watched the video closely. It’s not my cup of tea. But I get the impression that the gentleman might have a multi-culturally enriching background. As we’ve seen over the last 20+ years (during part of which Mr Two-Tier Keir Starmer was Director of Public Prosecutions) rape gangs from a certain multi-culturally enriching community were allowed to get away with vaginally and anally raping thousands of underage white working-class girls without being arrested or prosecuted. Yet a week or so ago, a white working-class man was immediately arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned just for shouting something like “who the f*** is A****?” And, of course, the multi-culturally enriching person who was videoed attacking several police officers at Manchester Airport about a month ago has, as far as I know, not yet been prosecuted. Apparently the police are still investigating in spite of having clear video evidence of the offence. It’s all very confusing.
Anyway, here’s the short video of a bit of what looks rather like misogyny which I propose our police investigate. I’m not a betting man. But I bet that our two-tier police will do absolutely nothing against the perpetrator. Though they might try charging me with some made-up offence for embarrassing our two-tier plods for doing my civic duty by handing the police what I believe is clear evidence of a crime:
David Craig, on September 5th, 2024
