I didn’t get much done yesterday. I spent far too long luxuriating in the sight of our lefty, elitist, voter-despising. West-hating, climate-crisis-propagandising, free-speech-loathing, globalist, migrant-hugging supposed ‘journalists’ all looking like they were being forced to eat a bucket-full of warm sick as they tried to explain away Trump’s triumphant election victory.
We expect lefty toilet paper like the Guardian, the Independent and the MIrror and broadcasters like the BBC and C4 and ITV to spew their demented bile at Trump. But it seems that Trump Derangement Syndrome has even spread to what used to be considered a reliable news source – The Times.
I did a quick search on YouTube to find all the torrent of videos released by Times Radio in the 3 days leading up to the US vote. In spite of the fact that the opinion polls showed a dead heat between Trump and the vacuous Kackling Kamala creature, here are the titles of the Times Radio’s videos:
Trump will lose the election by 5%
Trump loses voters
Trump in worst state ever
How Trump alienated swing voters
Trump will lose these key states, exclusive poll shows
Democrats optimistic that polls put them ahead of Trump
Why Trump will lose
Trump veers off script with clumsy comments in Pennsylvania
Trump has alienated swing state voters with Madison Square Garden rally hate speech
Trump limps to finish line in disastrous final week
Trump in trouble. Trump loses election momentum
Millions of ‘angry and motivated’ Americans will be final nail in Trump’s coffin
Trump’s huge mistake
Republicans turn on Trump paving way for a crushing defeat
Trump spiralling: ‘unprecedented’ numbers of Republicans are turning on Trump
Trump’s overconfidence will cost him the election
Trump is ‘a nasty individual’ and a threat to the world
Trump HQ terrified
And every one of these Times Radio videos featured one or more Trump haters being interviewed venting their bulging-eyed fury at Trump and anyone ‘stupid enough’ to vote for him. And in its main article about the US election today, the Times newspaper was still attacking Trump by calling him: “a twice impeached convicted felon”.
I’m investigating whether I can report Times Radio to Ofcom.
Anyway, thankfully for the world, none of this flood of rather desperate Times Radio Trump-abominating videos seem to have aged well.
Hopefully we now all know that none of the legacy media can be trusted, that they have nothing but contempt for us ordinary voters and that all their supposed ‘opinion’ polls are just propaganda aimed at pushing us to vote the way they want us to vote. In the case of the US election, the biased fake opinion polls seem all designed to suggest that it was worth voting for the Kackling One as she could beat Trump. Had the polls told the truth – that Kackler was always a busted flush – then Trump’s victory could have been even more overwhelming.
Sadly for us, while America has turned against the liberal, progressive, woke, socialist, open-borders-migration, climate-crisis nonsense, we in Britain have another almost five years of national economic and societal suicide under Komissar Keir and his UK-hating, UN-loving, IPCC-adoring Stalinist apparatchiks. I wonder if our country will ever recover?
Give Starmer’s current ‘approval’ ratings (see chart below), I suspect he will be rather interested in protecting the (IMHO) cowardly thug, Labour MP Mike Amesbury, in order to avoid a by-election which might see Reform taking the seat despite a previous 15,000+ Labour majority:
But how will Starmer protect the Runcorn Rumbler (Mike Amesbury) while trying to give the impression that Amesbury is being punished for assaulting a constituent because (as Multi-Tier Keir keeps telling us) “nobody is above the law”?
The conditions required to give voters the opportunity to recall an MP are quite clearly stated on the House of Commons website:
MPs can be recalled under three circumstances:
Conviction in the UK of any offence and sentenced or ordered to be imprisoned or detained, after all appeals have been exhausted. Note – a sentence over 12 months in jail automatically disqualifies someone from being an MP;
Suspension from the House following report and recommended sanction from the Committee on Standards for a specified period (at least 10 sitting days, or at least 14 days if sitting days are not specified);
Convicted of an offence under section 10 of the Parliamentary Standards Act 2009 (making false or misleading Parliamentary allowances claims). Note – the sentence does not have to be custodial for this condition.
If one of the conditions is met the Speaker of the House must notify the local returning officer. They are known as a petition officer when dealing with a recall petition.
As you’ll see this gives Multi-Tier former law officer Keir Starmer plenty of ways to keep hold of the (IMHO) repulsive, violent hypocrite Amesbury. For example:
Amesbury could just be given an 11-month prison sentence or he could be given a suspended sentence. Then he could continue as an MP
The totally non-partisan Speaker could decide to not suspend Amebury by claiming that a suspended prison sentence was “sufficient punishment” or some such similar nonsense
Amesbury could, as I suggested in my weekend blog, ‘do a Huw Edwards’ and check himself into some sort of rehab for a few days claiming “mental health issues”
The police could do their usual trick, when faced with a politically-sensitive issue, of spending months suposedly ‘investigating’ Amesbury’s attack on his constituent and then the Crown Prosecution Service could spend several months more sitting on the case deciding whether it would be in the public interest to prosecute
There are probably a few more variations that a (IMHO) sleazy, slimey solicitor like Starmer could think of. So anyone expecting Amesbury to be investigated and prosecuted with the impressive alacrity Starmer demonstrated against the alleged “right-wing thugs” (who dared question Starmer’s race-replacement, open-borders immigration free-for-all or post hurty things on the Internet) are likely to be profoundly disappointed.
The ‘Runcorn Rumbler’ is the name I’ve given to Mike Amesbury – the Labour MP for Runcorn – who seems to believe that the best way to communicate with his constituents is to beat the sh*t out of them. The ‘greatest hits’ video features the Runcorn Rumbler speaking in the House of Commons about the need to prosecute and jail violent offenders interspersed with the Rumbler pounding a constituent, presumably to demonstrate what he means by ‘violent offender’. The Rumbler claims that he beat h*ll out of the constituent – sucker-punching him and then continuing to rain blows down on him as he lay defenceless on the ground – because he felt ‘threatened’. But the video shows that the constituent had his hands in his pockets. So I find it confusing how a man with his hands in his pockets could be construed as being ‘threatening’.
Multi-tier Keir’s ‘justice’ system
The Runcorn Rumbler’s antics pose a bit of a problem for our honest, hard-working, serially-grifting, totally-not-corrupt PM, multi-tier, gimme-free-gear Keir Starmer. The last thing Multi-Tier wants is a by-election in Runcorn which Labour could well lose to Reform, who came second to Labour in the constituency in this year’s general election. A loss of Labour’s circa 15,000 majority in the constituency to Reform would be rather disastrous for commie Keir. So we can expect to see some creative use of our politicised, totally-discredited supposed ‘justice system’ to avoid the Runcorn Rumbler losing his parliamentary seat.
Perhaps the Rumbler will ‘do a Huw Edwards’ and check himself into some kind of rehab for a couple of days or weeks or whatever claiming his violence was a result of ‘mental health issues’? Then the Rumbler can play the victim and anyone criticising the Rumbler’s (IMHO) unprovoked violence will be accused of being cruel and intolerant to people with mental health issues. That’s always a good trick for avoiding prosecution.
Or perhaps the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) will ‘do a Manchester Airport’? Just as happened with the two multi-culturally enriching gentlemen, who were filmed attacking police at Manchester Airport breaking the nose of one policewoman, the police and CPS will decide that, despite clear video evidence showing exactly what happened, the whole matter is incredibly complicated and the police and CPS will sit on the case for months or even years taking no action in the hope that everybody will forget about it?
Or perhaps Keir and his politicised, discredited CPS will find some other imaginative way of getting the Runcorn Rumbler off the hook in a way which avoids a by-election? After all, if my fading memory serves me correctly, multi-tier Keir’s time as Director of Public Prosecutions was a time of ‘good hunting’ with little to no risk of arrest and prosecution for multi-culturally enriching rape gangs in most of our cities and major towns. So a cynic might be tempted to suspect that honest Sir Keir is quite adept at using the ‘justice’ system to prosecute those he doesn’t like – for example, those who disagree with his open-borders, bring-in-the-Third-World immigration disaster – and protect those to whom he wants to grovel.
It’s going to be fun watching what slippery snake Sir Keir and his lapdog corrupt CPS come up with to get out of the mess that the Runcorn Rumbler’s brutishness has caused Starmer’s incompetent, blundering, increasingly unpopular Labour Party.
I don’t know if many readers have ever experienced working with our public sector. If so, then you will realise how mindbogglingly lazy, useless and wasteful most public-sector employees are. Today the (IMHO) incompetent and economically-challenged Rachel Reeves will present her budget and will, I expect, announce billions of supposed “investment” to supposedly “improve our public services”.
Let’s start with the word our financially-illiterate politicians and journalists are using – “invest”. The definition of “invest” is: “put (money) into financial schemes, shares, property, or a commercial venture with the expectation of achieving a profit.”
This does clearly not apply to spending on public services. What Labour are doing is “spending more” on public services and there is no prospect of a financial return or profit. After all, hiring another army of DIE (Diversity, Inclusion and Equality) managers is hardly a financial “investment”. So, please don’t be fooled by the use of the word “invest” by our lying politicians and pig-ignorant journalists.
Next point: We’ve been told that our chancellor has rewritten the country’s fiscal rules. I (like most politicians and journalists) don’t understand how she has done this. But I think it has something to do with reclassifying any money spent/squandered by the government on supposed ‘investments’ as a credit, rather than a debit, on the country’s balance sheet. If this is the case, it would magically make the country’s finances look much healthier than they actually are. This would allow the useless Reeves to borrow even more when our national debt is already above 100% of GDP and moving up towards the level of permanently bankrupt countries like Italy and Portugal:
Now let’s look at a few examples of how British governments spend/squander (sorry, of course I meant “invest”) our money.
Scottish Parliament
Some years ago I attended a meeting with a high-level Scottish bureaucrat. I was representing a company which helped clients get value for money from their suppliers. The Scrots has just spent over £45m on a new parliament building which was budgetted to cost less than £10m. When I explained how we could help our clients, the (IMHO) utterly useless individual said: “There’s not much suppliers can get past us canny Scots”.
HS2 trainline
I have written before about why the whole HS2 stupidity was unnecessary in a small country like England. France is a big country – about 640,000 km². Germany is quite a big country too – 357,592 km². The UK is a small country – about 242,000 km². England is an even smaller country – 130,000 km². So, France is 5 times the size of England and Germany is almost 3 times as large as England. Both France and Germany have extensive high-speed rail networks. It makes sense to have high-speed trains in a large country. It doesn’t make sense to have high-speed trains in a small country.
Now let’s go a bit deeper. The French train route from Paris to Lyon to Marseilles can probably be seen as comparable to the UK train route from London to Birmingham to Manchester in terms of how it connects major cities. But the differences in distances are huge. Paris to Lyon is 292 miles, whereas London to Birmingham is only 128 miles. And Lyon to Marseilles is 488 miles, whereas Birmingham to Manchester is a mere 86 miles.
Or if we take Germany, the route from Berlin to Frankfurt to Munich could also be compared to HS2’s London to Birmingham to Manchester. The distance from Berlin to Frankfurt is 341 miles – much more than London to Birmingham’s 128 miles. And the distance from Frankfurt to Munich is 244 miles – considerably more than Birmingham to Manchester’s measly 86 miles:
The much greater distances in France and Germany justify high-speed rail networks. But squandering over £100bn on cutting just a few minutes off the train time from London to Birmingham and then even fewer minutes off the 86-mile train journey from Birmingham to Manchester is utterly ludicrous.
There never was and never will be any need for a high-speed train network in England. The distances are simply too short. On the now-cancelled Birmingham to Manchester leg, the train would hardly have enough time to get up to speed before it had to slow down. Why the political, bureaucratic and engineering geniuses who planned the whole thing couldn’t see this more than minor problem defeats me.
Another trillion squandered
I don’t have room here to explain why the NHS computer system was a waste of £4bn+ and could never have worked anyway. I go into this in excruciating detail in my 2006 book PLUNDERING THE PUBLIC SECTOR. Then in my 2008 book SQUANDERED: How Gordon Brown is Wasting over One Trillion Pounds of Our Money I go through pretty much every government department showing how they have “invested” (squandered) over a trillion pounds of our money and got pretty much zilch in return for this “investment”.
The great squandering is about to begin
I could go on and on and on and on about how our governments have “invested” our money. But I’ve written several books about this, so I don’t have room here.
In conclusion, I guess the point of today’s blog is to warn readers that every time they hear the word “invest” they should automatically replace it with the phrase “spend and most likely squander”. Please believe me that until you have worked with government bureaucrats and politicians you can never really grasp the stupendous uselessness, profligacy and incompetence of our ruling elites and the financial ignorance of their paid prostitutes in the mainstream media.
I attach below a recent Neil Oliver monologue which I think may be one of his best.
While you may not agree with everything Neil Oliver says, I admire him for his courage in speaking out against our power-crazed elites. After all, he must know that by voicing anti-establishment opinions, he will never get the chance to make any documentaries again. Just as they did with David Bellamy, when he dared question the Global Warming cult, the mainstream media will excommunicate Neil Oliver for his ‘unacceptable’ views:
I was particularly interested in the clip Neil Oliver showed of a member of the ruling elite explaining at a WEF conference that we plebs are going to need a little less carrot and a little more stick to make us comply with the Net Zero restrictions our rulers are determined to impose on us.
Here’s the Neil Oliver video: “Who are these evil jokers?”
Here’s a lovely picture of the ‘starving’ and ‘oppressed’ descendants of slaves trying to use emotional blackmail so that the rulers of some of the most corrupt countries in the world can steal our money having already looted pretty much everything that wasn’t nailed down in their own countries:
I suppose we must accept that the huge belly on the guy on your right is the distended belly of someone suffering from malnutrition and not the bloated belly of someone who lives the high life at the expense of the poor, exploited sods he rules?
And here’s a chart of life expectancy by continent:
As you can see, the descendants of slaves have much longer life expectancy – at least another 15 years – in Europe and the Americas than they would have if their families had remained in squalid, excrement-covered, corrupt failing continent – Africa.
So perhaps there should be reparations? Perhaps these people should compensate us for the cost of their education and their extra years of life and in exchange we should offer them all one-way tickets to whichever African hell-hole they believe their forefathers came from? I wonder how many of these supposedly-exploited folk would choose to return to the continent of their ancestors?
While two-tier, gimme-free-gear, not-a-queer, never-touched-Lord-Alibaba’s-rear Keir prepares to find some weasel-worded way to sell us out to these venal crooks, ‘Clint Eastwood’ can maybe enlighten us on what we should be saying?
I started writing this before the reporting restrictions on the adorable Chris Kaba’s productive life were lifted. So I might as well leave this up for at least one day.
Yesterday (Tuesday 22 October) the ever reliable Guardian newspaper reported : “A Metropolitan police firearms officer who shot an unarmed suspect in the head has been acquitted of murder.”
This was, of course, a story about the acquittal of the police officer who shot Chris Kaba. The multi-culturally enriching community from which Mr Kaba came are, of course, outraged. And no doubt there will be protests and suchlike demanding ‘justice’ for the ‘innocent’ Mr Kaba:
Kaba’s family and supporters have tried to pull a fast one on us by portraying Kaba as a family man with a great future ahead of him. We were told he was about to become a father and was an ‘aspiring architect’. So let’s deal with these two claims:
About to become a father: Mr Kaba was served by police with a 28-day domestic violence protection order relating to Ms Waite, the mother of his unborn girl. The notice granted at Westminster magistrates’ court barred him from contacting her on social media or entering her street in Battersea. It added the order prohibits the “alleged perpetrator from using or threatening violence against Karimah Waite or pester, encourage or instruct any other person to do so”. It seems that one of Mr Kaba’s many talents was beating up women, even ones pregnant with his child.
The aspiring architect: Here Kaba’s family and supporters are really taking the p*ss. When he was still supposedly at school, Mr Kaba was sentenced to a four-year term in a young offender institution for possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence. The conviction dated to an incident in Butchers Road, Canning Town, at 3.25am on December 30, 2017.
Two years before his killing, on August 11, 2020, Mr Kaba, then 22, was pulled over just four miles away in Cranbrook Road, Thornton Heath, on suspicion of failing to stop a Vauxhall Astra on the order of a police constable in uniform. Bromley magistrates’ court heard the officer “had cause to believe it was being used in a manner likely to cause alarm, distress and/or annoyance to members of the public”. During a search, police found a lock knife. Two days later, Mr Kaba pleaded guilty to having a bladed article in a public place and driving without insurance.
In the days before he was shot, Kaba was linked to two shooting incidents – one when he allegedly shot a man in both legs (I can’t show the picture of the wounded man as it belongs to a news agency) and another when he was filmed shoooting a man in a nightclub. Moreover, rather than studying architecture, he actually seems (from what I understand) to have spent his time as a member of a local drugs and extortion gang.
Of course, just because Kaba was (IMHO) a total piece of garbage doesn’t give the police the licence to shoot him. That brings us to what happened when Kaba was killed.
What does ‘unarmed’ mean?
The Kaba family and the bleeding-heart liberals keep bleating that Kaba was ‘unarmed’ when he was shot. But when Kaba’s car was hemmed in by police cars and armed police, he used his car as a battering ram to try to smash a way to escape thus putting the lives of the police in danger. I’m no expert in policing. But if you are surrounded by armed police telling you to put your hands up, it’s probably more advisable to actually put your hands up rather than accelerating towards the police in an attempt to escape.
The usual race-gravy-train-riders will probably still try to milk the Kaba story to create more BLM nonsense. But the world is a much better place now that Mr Kaba has gone to meet his Maker. Perhaps he’ll meet the equally criminal George Floyd in whatever place he ends up?:
I don’t attach below a shortish YouTube video from Dr John Campbell. In it he tried to explain the mechanism by which mRNA vaccines may be damaging many people’s health, in particular by accelerating cancer growth.
Campbell is calling for governments to pause mRNA vaccine use and developments until medical trials can confirm whether the mRNA technology is safe.
Of course, this won’t happen for both political and economic reasons:
Political issues
It would be disastrous for the ruling elites if it was found that the mRNA technology is potentially harmful to human health. There would be widespread fury if people found out that they had been bullied, and in some cases forced, to take mRNA vaccines at the risk of losing their jobs or being unable to travel if they refused. For example, in the UK (if I remember correctly) close to 40,000 care workers lost their jobs by refusing the ‘vaccine’. But when bleating about the UK ‘social care crisis’, which our rulers use as an excuse to increase Third-World immigration, our rulers conveniently ‘forget’ that it was their vaccine mandates which are largely responsible for the lack of staff in the social care sector.
Economic issues
Our rulers believe that mRNA technology will be the future for rapid development of vaccines. And the British, Canadian and Australian governments have done deals with Moderna to set up mRNA vaccine manufacturing plants in those three countries. All three countries have seen massive de-industrialisation and outsourcing of their manufacturing to China due to their imbecilic, supposedly planet-saving Net Zero policies:
So these governments are desperate to show that they can create economic growth by ‘investing in the industries of the future’. And one of these ‘industries of the future’ is pharma. Hence the enthusiasm of these countries’ rulers to throw tens of millions of our money at companies like mRNA Moderna. It would be more than embarrassing for our elites if it was shown that mRNA technology was a busted flush. So the elites cannot allow this to happen, however much harm mRNA vaccines actually cause to those being vaccinated. Anyway, it will take years for those harms to be identified and proven and by that time those who promoted the mRNA products will have long since retired with their massive fortunes and pensions. So the mRNA gravy train will continue however many indications there are that this is leading to a medical disaster.
I wanted to attach Dr Campbell’s video, but it seems to have been taken down. Instead here’s another video in which he briefly (in the first 4 minutes) touches on the main problem with the mRNA technology. Though, unfortunately this available video doesn’t give the detailed description of how the mRNA technology may be harming us. But even this short piece may help you judge for yourself if you fancy becoming an mRNA experimental pin cushion:
An immigrant restaurant owner who fled Iraq 20 years ago has left Sweden and returned to his home country because of the violent crime he faced in his Stockholm suburb.
I moved to Sweden because it was a safe country.Now I’m moving from Sweden because it’s not safe anymore.
The man, speaking under the alias ‘Amin,’ said in an interview with Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter that he was the object of threats and violent attacks by criminal gangs and was forced to pay them to avoid harassment.
Amin came to Sweden after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, started a business, got married, and had children. But his successful restaurant was threatened by growing criminal activity in the area. A drug cartel began to extort business owners, typically demanding $1,000-5,000 per month to ‘protect’ them. Businesses that refused to pay suffered vandalism and threats.
”Imagine how it feels if you work ten hours a day.And then some disgusting person comes and threatens you and says nasty things to you,” Amin said.
Refusing to give up his hard-earned money, he was faced with increasingly violent threats. “I’ll destroy your whole d**n face. Your family won’t recognize you anymore,” one gang member says in an audio recording Amin collected as evidence. Over a decade, he was repeatedly threatened and assaulted.
The threats and violence forced him to close his restaurant, and the tense situation also led to his marriage falling apart.
Amin’s experiences highlight the growing insecurity in Swedish cities, where gang crime increasingly disrupts everyday life for many residents.
Once a homogenous country where every murder made the front page of every newspaper, had from the beginning of 2024 until May 15th experienced 109 shootings with 14 dead and 19 injured. During the same period, police recorded 50 bombings, 29 attempted bombings, and 74 preparations for bombing attacks.
Last year, the total number of shootings recorded by police in the country was 363, with 53 deaths, as well as 149 bombings.
Back in Iraq, Amin has again opened a restaurant and says about his current situation, “I live like a king! I am developing, I feel good. It is much safer in Iraq than in Sweden.
As I’m running out of material, here’s a fairly hard-hitting article from The Conservative Woman.
I particularly like the quote from Dr Richard Lindzen:
‘So here we are, confronted with policies that destroy Western economies, impoverish the working middle class, condemn billions of the world’s poorest to continued poverty and increased starvation, leave our children despairing over the alleged absence of a future, and will enrich the enemies of the West who are enjoying the spectacle of our suicide march, a march the cowardly energy sector accepts, being too lazy to exert the modest effort needed to check what is being claimed.
During the weekend I’ll think about whether it’s worth continuing when people like The Daily Sceptic, The Conservative Woman and Simon Webb’s History Debunked videos do what I do but do it so much better.
David Craig, on November 7th, 2024
