Tuesday blog
I have a short article on The Conservative Woman today:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By  David Craig, on September 1st, 2025Monday blog The London restaurant arson attack You might remember that there was an arson attack on an Indian restaurant in London about a week ago. Two people have been arrested. We don’t know who they are, nor do we know the reason for the attack. But I noticed that next door to the attacked restaurant was the “Shalom Hot Bagels” shop. That made me wonder if the arsonists hit their intended target – the Indian restaurant – or whether they were idiots and mistakenly attacked the Indian restaurant rather than their real target – the “Shalom Hot Bagels” shop. Britain’s political komissars I’m not a lawyer so I’m confused at the judgement allowing illegal migrants to remain in the Bell Hotel in Epping. In accepting the Government’s appeal, the three ‘judges’ blethered on about the consequences of forcing the illegal migrants to be moved. For example, the three appeal judges ruled that forcing the illegal migrants out of the hotel could:
But I had understood that it’s not for courts to read the mood of the public, nor is it for courts to consider the consequences of their decisions. Courts must apply the law as written and if that causes political problems then it is up to Parliament to change the law. For esample: in rejecting the initial judge’s decision to have the illegal migrants moved out of the hotel, Lord Justice Bean said: “The judge’s approach ignores the obvious consequence that the closure of one site means capacity needs to be identified elsewhere in the systemâ€. But there is no requirement stipulated in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that a court must take into consideration wider political issues in applying the law. If the Government wishes such consideration to be included in planning decisions, then it is up to the Government, not the courts, to change the law. But we should perhaps not be surprised that the three appeal court ‘judges’ ruled in favour of the Government and against the initial decision to move the migrants. Some degree of ‘personal animus’ against the original judge could seem inevitable when you have an ex-chair of the Fabian Society, leading member of ‘Lawyers for Labour’, or some such, and co-creator of Matrix Chambers, pronouncing on the judgement of another judge who stood as a Tory candidate. The Appeal court seems to be a matter of Labour members and friends helping out their mates in government. The only good thing is this debacle has kept the issues of illegal immigration, excess crime by illegals and ECHR firmly in the public eye and they are streaming to Reform as a result. Yet another own goal from the most incompetent and most hated government in British history By giving an interpretation to the Country Planning Act 1990 which isn’t included in the Act, the three appeal court ‘judges’ have proved what we all suspected – our courts are no longer interested in justce, and our ‘judges’ are just political komissars carrying out the wishes of their political masters. Just another example, not that one was needed, of Two-Tier Keir’s two-tier justice system. By David Craig, on August 29th, 2025Friday blog Here’s an article I wrote for the Daily Sceptic about strange things happening at the same time with:
‘Coincidentally’ all three have been attacked at the same time.
By David Craig, on August 27th, 2025Last blog I wrote recently about how I have been banned from YouTube. It seems that my new political parody videos have upset someone in Starmer’s ‘free speech’ Britain. What was quite chilling was that normally YouTube gives you a warning if you have broken their community guidelines and made people in the YouTube community feel ‘unsafe’. Even then, normally YouTube just takes down the offending video(s). But In my case, without giving any explanation, YouTube cancelled my whole channel thus even deleting videos I had made and uploaded 7 or 8 years ago. And now, ‘apparently ‘coincidentally’ someone (hello GCHQ) has attacked my website snouts-in-the-trough. I have learnt that someone (hello GCHQ) is causing my website to send out more than 100,000 emails a day causing havoc at the company which runs my website. Understandably that company is not too pleased and has given me 24 hours to sort out the situation or else my website will be taken down. Obviously, I haven’t a clue who (hello GCHQ) has attacked my website nor how to fix this. So I have already made my last ever YouTube video and expect this will be my last ever blog. Welcome to Starmer’s ‘free speech’ Britain! Oh, and in case you haven’t seen them, here are the four videos which have apparently led to me being silenced both by YouTube and now by my website hosting company in Starmer’s ‘free speech Britain: Keir Starmer: Back in the EU-SSR Keir Starmer: Angie Rachel Reeves: How I Crashed The Economy https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Zb1my2Sq5uxlk_wtwivxmBE0tQYN92TH/view?usp=sharing Ed Miliband: I want to bankrupt you If you want anyone else to see these videos, you’ll need to download the links before my website is taken down. Amazon is cancelling me I’ve just had an email from Amazon warning me that I have ‘violated’ the terms of their ‘Affiliate Programme’ and they will stop selling my books. So I have now been banned by YouTube, removed from my website and prevented from selling my books. Welcome to Starmer’s ‘free speech’ Britain! By David Craig, on August 26th, 2025Tuesday blog The news from Gaza seems to get worse by the day. But supposed ‘journalists’ interviewing the usual perpetually-outraged, Israel-hating, anti-semite commentators never ask the question “Why don’t Hamas release all the hostages?” After all, if all the hostages were released, then the killing could stop. Meanwhile, as Israel is being excoriated for defending itself, perhaps often rather too vigorously, against extermination, our friends from our favourite death cult (sorry, I meant ‘religion’) are quite busy slaughtering both their own adherents and any Christians they can get their hands on, but this never seems to be reported by our mainstream media. In just the last 30 days, there were 149 Islamic attacks in 17 countries, in which 612 people were killed and 316 injured. In 2025,  there were 1,436 Islamic attacks in 42 countries, in which 9,529 people were killed and 4824 injured. In 2024, there were 1,757 Islamic attacks in 52 countries, in which 9,559 people were killed and 8,464 injured In 2023, there were 1,799 Islamic attacks in 49 countries, in which 11,468 people were killed and 13,005 injured. In 2022,  there were 2,003 Islamic attacks in 51 countries, in which 9,031 people were killed and 6,820 injured. In 2021, there were 2,284 Islamic attacks in 55 countries, in which 11,834 people were killed and 9,599 injured. So, our friends from our most peaceful and tolerant religion seem to be slaughtering over 9,000 innocents a year – more than 25 a day. I could show some pictures and videos of the beheadings and shootings, but that might be against the law as, by showing what is actually happening in the world, would probably be classed as a hate crime or something like that. Anyway, here are just some of the attacks which have happened in the last week:
By David Craig, on August 23rd, 2025weekend blog Below I give a link to a recent YouTube video by Dr John Campbell. He is reporting some recent research in Japan where a study of about 18,000,000 people has revealed a much higher rate of excess deaths among those who have been vaccinated with the Covid mRNA vaccines compared to the unvaccinated. Give that Japan is a very monocultural society with a long tradition of obedience to authority, I don’t know what kind of people would have refused the Covid vaccine. Moreover, even if the research is reliable, we don’t know if it was the contents of the vaccine or the mRNA technology which has led to the higher rate of excess deaths. mRNA vaccines are very attractive to our rulers and to the Big Pharma companies as they are much cheaper and much quicker to develop and produce than traditional vaccines. Here’s an explanation from Google: mRNA vaccines are faster to develop because their platform can be quickly adapted to new pathogens by simply swapping out the genetic instructions for a new target protein, unlike traditional vaccines which require lengthy processes to grow or inactivate the virus itself. This modular approach significantly shortens development and manufacturing timelines, making them ideal for rapidly evolving diseases and public health emergencies. We know that for our rulers, mRNA vaccines are the future. If I remember correctly, Moderna has done deals with the UK, Australian and Canadian governments to set up mRNA vaccine development and production facilities in those countries. Oh, and of course, it might be worth mentioning that the investment company jointly set up by Rishi ‘Rich’ Sunak – Theleme Partners – had around 30% of its assets in Moderna. It’s unusual for any investment fund to have such a large proportion of its money in just one company. For legal reasons, I won’t be tempted to speculate on what Theleme Partners knew and what influence they had which convinced them to bet the house on Moderna. Unfortunately, thanks to Ofcom protecting us from ‘dangerous views’, the brilliant Mark Steyn is no longer permitted to broadcast in Britain. He was one of the leading voices in questioning the safety of mRNA vaccines as well as being outspoken in his exposure of the multi-culturally-enriching rape gangs. Dr Campbell, proposes that a sample size of around 18,000,000 suggests that there may be questions which need to be asked about the safety of the mRNA technology which is being pushed on us by our rulers. I don’t imagine that ‘our’ BBC Verify will be reporting this story. You only need to watch the first 5 minutes of the video up to where Dr Campbell features the chart of excess deaths to get the picture: By David Craig, on August 21st, 2025Thursday-Friday blog Looking at the (IMHO) useless, UK-hating, Davos-adoring, WEF puppet Starmer’s policies, one might be tempted to wonder if he is deliberately trying to provoke ordinary white British into an insurrection. After all, that would give Starmer the excuse to declare a state of emergency, call in the army to crush any opposition to his government and cancel elections. It might even give him the excuse to try to disbar Reform UK from standing in elections by tarring them as being ‘far right’ and a ‘danger to democracy’, just as the Germans have tried to close down the increasingly popular AfD. You all know how Starmer seems to have done everything possible to enrage the white British population:
The British are becoming rather angry Below is a link to a video put out by a group called (I think) ‘We Are True Patriots’. This video suggests that many British are getting increasingly angry at Starmer’s deliberate destruction of our country. There is so much anger that several respected people – Professor David Betz, Colonel Richard Kemp and others – are openly talking about a coming British civil war. In fact, I believe the original video has been banned by YouTube just as all my videos are now banned. But it seems that supporters of ‘We Are True Patriots’ have got round the ban by copying the original video and posting it on their YouTube channels. If this link doesn’t work, you can go on YouTube and search ‘Just a prick in Whitehall’: By David Craig, on August 19th, 2025Tuesday-Wednesday blog Last week, I tried to upload the fourth in a short series of political parody videos I had made. But I was prevented as I have been banned by YouTube and all my videos, even those which had been up for 7 or 8 years, were removed from YouTube. Here’s a link to an article I wrote for The Conservative Woman about my YouTube ban: Not only have my videos been removed, but I’m also no longer allowed to subscribe to other YouTube channels nor am I allowed to comment on other people’s YouTube videos. Helpfully, YouTube allows you one opportunity to appeal against their ban. But as they don’t tell you why you have been banned and your channel removed, it’s a rather Kafkaesque situation – you’ve been punished and are allowed to appeal against that punishment, but you’re never told the reason for that punishment. I thought of three reasons why my YouTube channel has been nuked. For example:
One aspect of my YouTube banning made me feel that my punishment beating from YouTube was due to someone in high places being miffed by my videos. I Googled whether YouTube usually gives people a warning before banning them and got this answer from Google: Yes, YouTube typically does provide a warning before issuing a strike or banning a channel for violating Community Guidelines. The first time a creator violates a guideline, they usually receive a warning, which doesn’t result in a strike against their channel. However, if the creator violates the same guideline again within 90 days, the warning may not expire, and the channel could receive a strike. Severe violations can lead to immediate channel termination without warning. The fact that I was exterminated by YouTube without any warning and without any explanation suggests to me that I have upset someone important. After all, YouTube could hardly admit that they had banned me because someone in government had demanded YouTube censor my channel. By the way, I did appeal my YouTube ban and my appeal was rejected in order “to keep the YouTube community safe”. Welcome to Starmer’s ‘free speech’ Britain. By David Craig, on August 18th, 2025Monday blog As this year’s monsoon hits Pakistan we have the totally predictable rain, floods, deaths and bleating from BBC journalists about ‘climate change’ making floods worse. So I thought it worth doing something the ludicrously-misnamed ‘BBC Verify’ never seems to do – look at the actual facts. Three years ago, we were told that 2022’s floods were the ‘worst in history:  So, it seems that this year’s floods aren’t too bad in comparison to 2022 in spite of the fact that the BBC assures us that floods are becoming worse due to climate change. A few hundred people have died in this year’s Pakistan floods. I have only managed to find data on the numbers of people killed in Pakistan in floods for the last 75 years:
The death toll from the current floods is estimated at just over 400 people. The couple of minutes research I did (see above) found five Pakistan floods – 1950, 1992, 1993, 2010 and 2022 – which killed more than that. What about the population and the trees?One issue BBC Verify and none of the climate catastrophists seem keen to mention is the massive scale of deforestation in Pakistan largely due to the country’s rapidly-expanding population. Trees are obviously important in countries which have seasons with heavy rainfall as they help absorb the rain and stabilise the land so the rain doesn’t result in landslides and floods. The population of Pakistan is increasing at an astonishing rate:  At the time of the 2010 floods, which killed around 2,000 people, the population of Pakistan was about 180 million. By 2022, this had reached 230 million – a rise of 50 million in just 12 years. Probably linked to the rise in population is the rate of deforestation. Just between 2013 and 2020 Pakistan’s tree coverage fell from 5.2% to 4.8%:  To put this into context, the world average in 2020 based on 193 countries is 32.2%. Pakistan comes in at 164 out of 193 countries in levels of tree cover. Pakistan’s neighbour, India, has 24.3% tree cover – almost six times as much as Pakistan. According to the World Wildlife Fund, Pakistan had the second fastest rate of deforestation in Asia (Afghanistan was worse). And the WWF recommends a country has around 35% forest cover. So, it’s hardly surprising that, with so little tree cover, when the monsoons hit Pakistan, the result is inevitably rushing torrents of water, floods and destruction of property and agricultural land. Pakistan’s corrupt elites slavering over the money they can steal?Pakistan has a large-scale tree planting initiative called the “10 Billion Tree Tsunami”. This project, launched in 2018, aims to plant ten billion trees across the country within five years. It’s an expansion of a previous project, the “Billion Tree Tsunami” in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. The initiative is part of Pakistan’s efforts to combat climate change and deforestation. Strangely, in spite of these wonderful projects, no doubt paid for using foreign aid from countries including Britain, deforestation has continued. I wonder what happened to all the money donated to the tree-planting projects? Pakistan has for years been one of the largest recipients of UK foreign aid and is projected to pocket about £133m in 2024/25. On Transparency International’s Corruption Index, Pakistan comes in at number 140 of 180 countries rated according to their levels of corruption – just above such earthly paradises as Zimbabwe, Eritrea and Uzbekistan. So, a cynic might be tempted to wonder whether it’s not climate change but a massive increase in population and an alarming level of deforestation and corruption which have contributed to the amount of damage caused by Pakistan’s totally predictable monsoon rains. However, there is at least one certainty – these floods will provide yet another wonderful opportunity for Pakistan’s utterly corrupt elites to enrich themselves by looting the foreign aid that will pour into the country. By David Craig, on August 13th, 2025Wednesday-Thursday blog Our great leader – the (IMHO) recidivist liar and liar and liar Keir Starmer – claims his brilliant policies will stop the boats. Yet strangely, the number of often uneducated, often unemployable, often criminal often West-hating illegal migrants keeps increasing. I wonder why this might be the case. The BBC certainly doesn’t seem to know as on Tuesday this week, reporting on the fact that more than 50,000 Third-Worlders had come to Britain since Starmer became PM, the BBC reporter stated that it was unclear why so many were coming to Britain. So, being a charitable and helpful sort of person, I thought I could assist the BBC in understanding the disastrous Third-World invasion of our country turning our country into an excrement-covered, crime-ridden, violent backwards hell-hole. Here are just a few possible reasons the Third-Worlders are coming to our shores:
As for the ‘evil people-smuggling gangs’ (that Mr Liar PM says he’s going to ‘smash’) with around 1,000 migrants arriving every week after paying an average of £3,273 per person to the gangs that earns the about-to-be-smashed gangs around £3,273,000 a week – over £170 million a year – so I rather doubt that our lying PM’s smashing will be particularly successful in deterring this incredibly lucrative business. Dear confused BBC, I hope this helps you understand why Britain is being invaded and ruined by the Third-World hordes. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2026 Snouts in the Trough - All Rights Reserved | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
