Oh dear. It looks like the Remainers have won. They have, of course, been ably assisted by the (IMHO) low-life, lying, hypocritical, garbage like Bercow, Letwin, Grieve, Hammond and Starmer.
We can now see the Remainers’ plan for sabotaging Brexit and keeping us in their beloved, German-run Fourth Reich also known as the EU. Here it is in five simple steps:
Step 1 – Delay and Delay
Delay Brexit yet again and again and again to give the Remainers more time to sabotage it
Step 2 – Amend and amend
Pass amendments to Boris Johnson’s deal either keeping us in, or keeping us closely aligned to, the EU Single Market and Customs Union. Thus they transform Brexit into BRINO (Brexit In Name Only) as Britain will have to accept all EU rules (without any right to vote against them), won’t be able to make trade deals with any other countries and will remain under the jurisdiction of the laughably misnamed European Court of Justice
Step 3 – Fix the second Referendum
Have a second Referendum in which the choice is between BRINO or Remain. In this fixed Referendum, ‘Leave’ will not be a option. The Remainers know that leavers will be so disgusted by this lack of choice that they won’t bother voting. That will give a majority to BRINO or Remain
Step 4 – Keep us in the EU
Remainers, claiming they are only following the democratic will of the people, will use this fixed second Referendum result to keep us either in the Fourth Reich or so closely aligned to the Fourth Reich that we might as well be in it.
Step 5 – Comrade Corbyn rides into Downing Street
After their Referendum victory, the Remainers will allow a General Election. Their hope will be that the Leave vote will be split between the Tories and the Brexit Party thus allowing Comrade Corbyn and his bunch of Marxist scum to seize power and transform Britain into Europe’s Venezuela.
The greatest con-trick in British history?
As the otherwise useless Theresa May so succinctly said last week – the original 2016 Referendum was the greatest con-trick ever played on the British people.
What a mess! What a f**king disaster! Brexit delayed yet again and again and again by (IMHO) scumbag lying Remainers. Letwin, Grieve, Soubry, Gauke and all the other (IMHO) lying Remainer garbage.
But, if the Remoaner scum can use the courts to block the Government and Brexit, why can’t Brexiteers use them to outwit the lying, treacherous, UK-hating, pieces-of-sh*t Remainers?
It’s clear to me that the (IMHO) treacherous, UK-Hating surrender monkeys Letwin, Grieve, Hammond, Gauke etc plus the Libdems and Labour and the howling, intellectually-challenged Scrots are going to try to use a 3-month delay to get a second referendum. And the question in the referendum will be Boris’s Deal or Remain. Or maybe it will just be Remain or Remain? The one thing they won’t risk is a General Election as Remainers know that nobody wants Comrade Corbyn and Lenin McDonnell running the country and that Boris Johnson’s popularity goes up with every dirty trick the Remainers use to keep us in their beloved EU
So I was wondering why Brexiteers can’t start using the courts to block the Remainer scum’s tricks.
I’m not a lawyer. But I wonder if the Brexit Party could get ahead of events by doing the following:
1. Investigate whether the promise made in the Government’s 2016 booklet sent at a cost of £9m of taxpayers’ money to every home in which the Government promises to implement what the British people decide could be viewed as a legally-binding contract between the Government and voters. This legally-binding aspect is reinforced by the fact that all political parties committed many times verbally and in their 2017 written election manifestos to respect the result of the 2016 Referendum
2. If the commitment to implement the result of the Referendum can be established as a legally-binding contract between the main parties and voters, then the Brexit Party could launch a pre-emptive legal action against the Electoral Commission. The action would be based on the principle that, as all political parties have given legally-binding commitments to abide by the result of the 2016 Referendum, then Remain cannot be an option in any second Referendum as the people would have already voted to Leave in 2016 – a result all the main parties said they accepted. Therefore the only permissable options in any second Referendum would be either “Leave with Johnson’s Deal” or “Leave with No Deal”.
3. If this could be done, this would totally sink Labour’s and the LibDems’ and the SNP’s attempts to block Brexit by calling a second Referendum.
The repulsive Remoaners are not the only people who can use the courts. Moreover, the Brexit Party must have the funds (or could raise them easily from supporters like myself) to pay for such legal action
So, come on Brexit Party. Instead of bitching and moaning about how awful Boris Johnson’s deal is, accept that most of the country support it and get behind it. And for God’s sake hire some decent lawyers and fight this shambles in court.
I’ve given you one idea of how this can be done. But if you pull your fingers out, you can probably find others.
Farage, Tice, Widdecome and the rest of you – get your act together, get some lawyers and fight for Britain!!!!!
No point mentioning Brexit today. We’ll have to see what happens in the House of Scumbags. But if our useless, self-serving, greedy, expenses-fiddling MPs delay Brexit yet again, well…………… I’m speechless in my fury at their lies and dishonesty.
Ghandi was a ‘racist bastard’
Like me you might have thought that Mahatma Gandhi was a towering historical colossus whose campaign of peaceful resistance helped ensure India’s independence from British colonial rule. How wrong you would have been.
Woke, politically-aware, progressive, libtard idiot students from Manchester University are campaigning to tear down a statue of Mahatma Gandhi. In a campaign self-styled as #GandhiMustFall, students – led by Manchester sabbatical officer Sara Khan – have highlighted supposedly problematic opinions that the Indian freedom-fighter held – claiming the Indian race was genetically superior to Africans.
The students claim in an open letter that Manchester must “stand in solidarity with Manchester’s Black and Kashmiri communities” and tear down this ‘colonist’ statue…
Italy welcomes migrants again
Now that Matteo Salvini is no longer Interior Minister, the new leftist Italian coalition government of the Five Star Movement and the Democratic Party has opened the country’s ports to migrant transport NGOs. As interior minister, Matteo Salvini had closed the ports to NGO ships.
And just this week an illegal Tunisian migrant, who had been deported from Italy, mocked populist leader Matteo Salvini after getting back into the country, saying he was glad Salvini was gone:
The Tunisian is one of around 2,000 migrants who have landed in Italy in September. Yipee, the NGO people smugglers are back in business and most of Africa will soon be heading to Europe again.
Spanish separatists more dangerous than rapists?
You might have seen on the news that there have been some riots in Spain (Catalonia) against the prison sentences given to some politicians who organised an illegal independence referendum.
Here are some wonderful multi-cultural enrichers from Huddersfield:
They were responsible for the rape, beating, sodomisation and forced prostitution of hundreds of underage white girls, some as young as eleven, over years while our useless police looked the other way and pretended nothing was happening. One girl was even raped and sodomised by over 100 ‘Asian’ men. Why do I mention these vile animals in a piece about Spain? Because, although one of these pieces of sh*t did get a prison sentence of 18 years, most got just between 5 and 10 years and will probably be out in around half that time. Members of ‘Asian’ rape gangs in many other British towns got similar trivial sentences
In comparison, let’s look at the prison sentences handed down to the Catalan politicians and independence activists who organised the supposedly ‘illegal’ referendum:
Former Catalan Vice President Oriol Junqueras – Convicted of sedition and misuse of public funds. Sentenced to 13 years in prison.
Former Catalan Foreign Minister Raül Romeva. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Former Catalan Labour Minister Dolors Bassa. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Former Catalan Regional Government Spokesman Jordi Turull. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to 12 years in prison.
Former President of the Catalan Parliament Carme Forcadell (pictured above with her British opposite number). Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to 11 and a half years in prison.
Former Catalan Interior Minister Joaquim Forn. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to 10 and a half years in prison.
Former Catalan Territorial Minister Josep Rull. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to 10 and a half years in prison.
Pro-Catalan Independence Activist Jordi Cuixart. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to nine years in prison.
Pro-Catalan Independence Activist Jordi Sànchez. Convicted of sedition. Sentenced to nine years in prison.
Evidently our rulers consider anyone wanting independence and organising a peaceful but unofficial referendum to be much more dangerous to society than our Asian rapist friends from Huddersfield and Rotherham and Newcastle and Rochdale and many other British towns and cities
If I remember correctly, every single MP in the House of Conmen (and Conwomen) was elected on the clear promise that they would deliver on the results of the 2016 EU Referendum (except perhaps the Greens?).
Since then, of course, we’ve seen this bunch of low-life, lying scum try every trick they can think of to block Brexit.
Since Boris Johnson became PM the lies from the lying Remoaner scum have reached fever pitch. They screamed that Boris Johnson was trying to force a ‘no deal’. They howled that he was a ‘dictator’ and a ‘tyrant’. They rushed to court to reverse Johnson’s decision to prorogue Parliament (and then did nothing with the extra few days sitting). They self-righteously claimed that they were only trying to block a ‘no-deal Brexit’ as this would supposedly be “catastrophic” for the British economy. They slandered the PM’s adviser, Dominic Cummings, and kept pushing negative stories about him to the press. They tried to ruin Boris Johnson by mudslinging about his character and personal life. They enacted the Benn Act forcing Johnson to write a grovelling letter to the EU requesting yet more delay if Johnson (as they expected) didn’t get a deal.
But now the lying Remoaner scum have a small problem. Boris Johnson has come back with an acceptable deal. So, will our MPs, who have all been elected on the clear promise that they would respect the result of the 2016 Referendum, vote through Johnson’s deal? Will they put our national interest above their narrow careers and party interest?
Probably not. The ludicrously misnamed LibDems have already announced they will vote against the deal, revoke Article 50 and keep Britain in the German-run EU basically saying f**k off to the 17.4 million voters who chose Lave. The Scrots will always vote against everything proposed by a Tory Government as will the Sheep-sh****rs and the one Green MP. As for Labour – they face electoral oblivion if Boris Johnson succeeds in fulfilling his promise to get us out of the EU by 31 October. So they’ll vote against.
Probably, we’ll see our lying scum MPs demanding a second referendum on Boris Johnson’s deal in the hope that by manipulating the question and possibly giving the vote to 16- and 17-year-olds they can get a majority for remaining in the EU.
So much for all those promises to respect the result of the 2016 Referendum. Now we’ll see that our lying, lowlife, scum MPs were intent on Blocking Brexit all the time. The liars will now be exposed.
And to cheer us up at this dreadful time of dishonesty and betrayal, here’s just one of the Remoaners explaining why there was never any chance of Boris Johnson returning from Brussels with a deal. Rory Stewart – I believe you’re a wonderful, honest, insightful, public-service-minded, political colossus as are your Remoaner chums Dominic Grieve, Anna Soubry and David Gauke etc etc . But some cynics might think that you and your Remoaner chums Dominic Grieve, Anna Soubry and David Gauke etc etc are fools, liars or charlatans or maybe all three?
Anyway, here’s that great international statesman – Rory Stewart – putting us ignorant, small-minded, plebs in our place:
Hopefully you’ve all seen this photo. Apparently it was taken yesterday morning at the Eurostar train terminal:
It features a bunch of Remainers – Grieve, Cable, Lammy and a Scrot, an ecoloon and a Sheep-Sh****r all off to Brussels at our expense. And why were they going to Brussels? Could it have been to persuade the EU to not offer a deal to Boris Johnson? Could it have been to delay Brexit to both humiliate Boris Johnson and to give the Remainers the time to organise a new EU referendum where the choice would be Remain or Remain?
As this bunch of (IMHO) lying, UK-hating, europhiliac scumbags are probably working against the British Government, surely they must be guilty of treason? Surely they should be arrested and dragged before the courts?
Grovelling to the Religion of Peacefulness or protecting Christians?
You might sometimes have wondered who is the greatest protector of the world’s second most persecuted religion – Christians. You might have thought it was the old guy in the Vatican who likes to dress up in women’s clothing.
But, unfortunately for persecuted Christians, the decrepit cross-dresser seems to spend much of his time protecting Catholic pedophiles and grovelling to those who hate Christians and would have them all killed (once they’ve finished killing all the Jews):
Now let me show you a simple chart. It features the number of refugees allowed into the America during the last 17 years:
Hopefully you’ll see four things:
high/record levels of immigration under Imam al-Obama
rapidly-increasing numbers of Muslims entering the USA under Imam Hussein al-Obama
a massive drop in immigration under Trump
the massive drop in immigration under Trump being mainly amongst Muslim refugees
And here’s a link to a short (2 minutes) video showing why Trump is a protector of the world’s second most persecuted religion – Christians. It’s wonderful. No politician would dare say and do the things that Trump is willing to say and do to protect Judeo-Christian Western civilisation from the destructive, West-hating, invading Third-world hordes:
Our rulers like to fob us off about the extent of immigration by quoting what they call “Net Migration”. That’s the number of people coming to the UK minus the number leaving:
There are three main weaknesses with the Government’s “Net Migration” figures
Most people probably don’t look too deeply at the numbers and so are lulled into believing that the number of people coming to Britain is about 200,000 a year – the Net Migration figure
From what I understand the Government’s figures come from what they call the International Passenger Survey (IPS). So, these are not accurate figures. They’re just based on extrapolation from a supposedly statistically-significant sampling
The official numbers don’t take any account of the quality of those leaving and arriving. For example, if say 50,000 well-off pensioners leave the UK every year to live abroad in the sun and 50,000 illiterate brides and bridegrooms – mostly first cousins and mostly speaking no English from filthy little villages in somewhere like Crapistan come to Britain, then overall the quality of the UK population will have declined as will the size of the taxpaying population
But there is another source of figures about the number of people arriving in the UK which the Government tends to gloss over. This is the number of National Insurance numbers issued each year to people born abroad.
This shows that in the year ending March 2019, 612,000 people moved to the UK
(I apologise that the chart is so difficult to read. The blue line is the total of NI numbers issued to people born abroad, the orange line is the number of NI numbers issued to people born outside the EU and the red line is the number of NI numbers issued to EU citizens)
You’ll see a few things:
the number of people coming from the EU (that’s mostly younger people coming to work – the red line) is declining
the number of people coming from outside the EU (many possibly for marriage and family reunions and possibly less likely to be coming for work) is shooting up
the total number of people coming to the UK is over 600,000 a year
Let’s just pause for a moment. Taking the figures for the year up to March 2019, if 612,000 people moved to the UK, that’s 51,000 arrivals a month – around 12,000 a week.
If 612,000 people arrived in the UK in 12 months, that’s the equivalent to adding a town like Bristol or Glasgow ever year.
One can’t be serious every day. So today I thought I’d introduce you all to one of Britain’s most important organisations – The Association of Professional Declutterers and Organisers (APDO). No, I’m not joking this bunch of (IMHO) jokers really exists:
How do I know about APDO? Because a few days ago, I got a flyer through my mailbox offering the services of my local ‘declutter and organiser’. My local declutter and organiser offered her services “helping you find inner calm and life balance through guidance, support and organisation”.
And how did this wonderful person plan to help me “find inner calm and life balance”? She would assist with:
Decluttering and space organisation
Paperwork administration
Home staging/styling (whatever that is?)
Help with downsizing and letting go.
And what would this cost? There was a special £20 per hour introductory rate compared to a normal price of £35 a hour.
I have a couple of problems with my local declutterer. Firstly, a person who farms is called a ‘farmer’; a person who plumbs is called a ‘plumber’; a person who roofs is called a ‘roofer. But my local member of APDO proudly announces she is a member of the Association of Professional Declutters and Organisers. If she is so ‘professional’, she should know that she is a ‘declutterer’ and NOT a ‘declutter’.
But, on the other hand, perhaps my local declutter(er) is not an illiterate. Maybe she has managed to declutter the word ‘declutterer’ by removing the final ‘er’ to make the word into the tidier ‘declutter’? Perhaps my local declutter(er) is actually a genius?
Secondly, what a totally fatuous occupation a declutter(er) and organiser is in my humble opinion. If I want to throw out some old crap, I wouldn’t need to pay a professional organiser and declutter(er) £35 an hour to tell me what to bin.
However, if you sometimes feel like this:
And you want to find “find inner calm and life balance”, then perhaps you too should contact the Association of Professional Declutterers and Organisers:
I’m sure their highly-trained and professional members will bring you and your home inner peace and harmony:
More ‘snackbars’ in Syria
On a slightly more serious note, I’ve just come across a brief bit of video from Northern Syria. It shows some Turkish troops rounding up some Kurdish civilians. Then one of the Turkish soldiers shouts to one of his mates “film me, film me” as he proceeds to slaughter the Kurdish civilians with his machine gun while screaming something about his ‘snackbar’. But were I to provide the link, I’d probably be prosecuted for you-know-what-ophobia
First let us celebrate that the whingeing, whining Scrottish rugby team have been thrashed out of the world cup. The other teams, whose games were cancelled due to the typhoon, accepted this with sportmanship realising that their Japanese hosts were more concerned with protecting property and lives than with some pointless game of rugby. But the whingeing, whining Scrots immediately started threatening legal action to ensure their game was kept. That seems to me to be rather insulting to their Japanese hosts – the Scrots’ assumption that their game of rugby was more important than Japanese lives.
Anyway, thankfully the Scrots were beaten by Japan and have now hopefully headed home. Though with the screeching, vertically-challenged wee Krankie running Scrotland, perhaps the Scrots will consult their lawyers and start demanding the game be replayed and replayed and replayed until the Scrots win?
Australians deal with immigrant house invaders
Here’s a lovely little video of how a couple of Australian men dealt with some immigrant house invaders. The video is presented by a guy called Avi Yemini. He’s an Australian from an orthodox Jewish family. He spent a few years serving in the IDF (Israeli Defence Forces) and has a fairly realistic view of the benefits Australian society will get from mass immigration of vibrant, diverse, multi-cultural enrichers.
If this happened in Britain, the householders would be prosecuted by our useless hug-a-rapefugee police.
Apologies – this weekend’s blog might be a bit long.
Asking the wrong question gives the wrong answer
Imagine you were given a well-paid position on a government quango whose aim was, for example, to come up with proposals to reduce obesity by taxing high-sugar foods. And imagine your quango position came with almost unlimited expenses and the freedom to go on ‘study trips’ flying first class and staying in luxury hotels and eating in luxury restaurants around the world.
The first problem would be that your committee was assuming high-sugar foods were the cause of obesity and would thus ignore things like sedentary lifestyles, the selling-off of school playing fields, schools avoiding sports due to lack of facilities, Elf and Safety rules and increasingly litigious parents, etc etc
Moreover, what would your committee recommend? Would it propose reducing obesity through education and building more sports facilities if the committee saw that approach had been successful in other countries? Probably not as that would mean your committee members were out of a job and would lose all those wonderful airmiles-collecting luxury trips. What your committee would do are two things:
find examples where increasing taxes on sugar-rich foods had been used and big those up to support its recommendation for increased taxes
recommend that the committee keeps working for many years into the future to supposedly study the effects of the higher taxes on obesity rates
In this way, your committee would both justify its existence and keep its members’ lucrative sinecures going for many more years.
Now let’s look at the IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
The IPCC was established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and was later endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly. Membership is open to all members of the WMO and UN. The IPCC produces reports that contribute to the work of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the main international treaty on climate change. The objective of the UNFCCC is to “stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human-induced) interference with the climate system”.
IPCC reports cover the “scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.” The IPCC does not carry out original research, nor does it monitor climate or related phenomena itself. Rather, it assesses published literature including peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources.
So, here are a few things you should have noticed:
the IPCC charter assumes climate change is caused by greenhouse gas emissions
the IPCC charter assumes humans are responsible for the changing climate
the IPCC charter assumes that this supposed ‘anthropogenic interference with the climate system’ is ‘dangerous’
the IPCC doesn’t actually do any research itself – it just reviews research done by other people
Now let’s deal with these four points:
The IPCC charter assumes climate change is caused by greenhouse gas emissions. It therefore ignores the possibility that cyclical climate change is a natural phenomenon that has nothing to do with greenhouse gas emissions:
The IPCC charter assumes humans are responsible for the changing climate and therefore ignores the influence on our climate of variations in solar activity and Milankovitch Cycles. Moreover the IPCC also ignores the fact that CO2 is a trace gas that makes up only 0.002% of our atmosphere and that CO2 levels have been much higher in the past without any detrimental effect on life on Earth
The IPCC charter assumes that this supposed ‘anthropogenic interference with the climate system’ is ‘dangerous’. This thus ignores the beneficial effect of CO2 in improving plant growth which has helped boost crop yields around the world and it ignores the fact that deaths from extreme climate events have fallen by over 95% during the last 100 or so years
The IPCC doesn’t actually do any research itself – it just reviews research done by other people. Hopefully you know that any scientist daring to question the lunatic cult of Man-made Climate Change loses access to government research grants and is probably hounded out of their job by the virtue-signalling, brainwashed social-media mob. Botanist David Bellamy was just the first of many experts sent into exile for thinking ‘wrong-thought’ about climate change. More recently Australian physicist Peter Ridd was recently fired from his teaching post for daring to suggest that damage to the Great Barrier Reef was not as serious as the ecofascists were claiming:
So, most climate research automatically assumes the Earth is warming and that human activity is responsible. Thus the papers the IPCC is reviewing are all preaching the same religion rather than trying to pursue real science.
Hopefully, the above is sufficient to show why the IPCC’s supposed ‘objective’ reports are just bias and lies dressed up as science.
And to cheer us up – here’s something completely different:
I often watch the BBC midday news after being in the gym and while having lunch. Just as I was about to turn it off yesterday, I was suddenly gripped by some of the most un-turn-offable and terrifying TV I have seen for a long time.
It was mad socialist/communist Jeremy Corbyn laying out his plans for what he would do after he had led his extremist, Jew-hating, UK-hating, terrorist-loving Marxist mob to victory at the next election. It was billed as Corbyn’s ‘Alternative Queen’s Speech’
If you’re lazy, a scrounger, an enricher with 15 to 20 children with 3 or 4 different wives or a snowflake brainwashed in one of our left-wing madrassas (formerly known as ‘universities’) which teach nothing but give Firsts to almost everyone, then middle-class Marxist Jeremy Corbyn (brother of Piers Corbyn) had something for you.
Here are just some of the more worrying freebies promised by the Marxist madman in what he called “the most transformative, radical and exciting programme ever put before the British electorate”:
removing the limit on child benefit from just two children to getting child benefit for all your children (I wonder which group will benefit most from that?)
removing the cap on benefits so a large family could easily earn £40,000 or £50,000 or more a year without doing any work and live in the most expensive areas of the UK if they wanted as working people would be facing increased taxes to pay the benefit scroungers’ unlimited housing benefit
a second EU referendum in which people would be able to choose between Remain fully in the EU or BRINO (theoretically leave the EU while remaining in the Single Market, Customs Union and under the control of the ludicrously misnamed ‘European Court of Justice’)
abolishing private education, free schools and academies and putting all schooling under the deadening, stifling, bureaucratic control of local councils
declaring a ‘Climate Emergency’ making Britain ‘carbon-neutral (whatever that means) long before the current target of 2050 ‘improving on’ Ed Miliband’s ‘ambitious’ Climate Change Act and thus closing down what little is left of British industry to save the planet from something that isn’t happening anyway and which even his own brother, astrophysicist and long-range weather-forecaster Piers Corbyn, would tell him is just a socialist hoax with no scientific evidence
abolish ‘inequality’ – just like they did in Venezuela!
But some of the Marxist madman’s other policies were less lunatic and possibly appealing even to some normally sensible people:
nationalise electricity supply, water supply and the railways paid for by ??????????????
abolishing university fees altogether and giving everyone free education for life paid for by ??????????????
raise the minimum wage to £10 per hour for all workers over 16 years old
reduce the working week to 32 hours within 10 years paid for by ??????????????
workers on company boards and all workers getting dividends from their employers every year without having to take the risk of buying any shares
free care for the elderly paid for by ??????????????
free prescriptions for everyone paid for by ??????????????
build 100,000 new low-rent council homes a year paid for by ??????????????
billions and trillions more for the grossly-mismanaged, wasteful, floundering NHS paid for by ??????????????
Corbyn didn’t mention lowering the voting age to 16 to ensure Labour remain in power. But I imagine he’s keeping that little trick under wraps till he and his controllers get into power.
And how is Corbyn going to pay for all this? I imagine he’ll have some new government department plant a whole eco-friendly forest of magic money trees. Or else, maybe he’ll massively increase taxes, impose exchange controls and start confiscating private land and private property. Who knows?
It was all worryingly appealing to the more than 55% of British people who take out more in benefits and public services than they pay in taxes.
Given these promises and the lunatic attempts of (IMHO) europhiliac, UK-hating, treacherous, surrender-monkeys like Dominic Grieve, Anna Soubry, David Gauke and others of their ilk to destroy the current Tory government, a Marxist Corbyn Marxist government is not an impossibility.
David Craig, on October 22nd, 2019
